<br>(Reporter Wang Qiu) Ms. Zhang and her husband to court for Lee divorce,moncler outlet online,http://www.pizza-lafo.de, and split housing and other jointly owned property. Lee received a complaint,http://www.noshironet.jp/bbs2/light.cgi?res=882\,woolrich outlet online, but said he did not have the have been married for nearly 20 years, his wife, the house is to buy their own,http://www.lehetj.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=101772, I do not agree to split the property. Yesterday, reporters learned,http://samplar.sakura.ne.jp/uiaw_2006edition/cgi-bin/bbs01/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=6441/, Haidian Court has accepted this bizarre divorce.<br> <br>The plaintiff sued the very fact that she and Lee have been married for nearly 20 years is a couple. April 20, 1993 registration of marriage,louboutin soldes, and fathered two children. Due to personality clashes with Lee,scarpe hogan outlet,http://hyper5.amuser.net/~youknow/limelight/kobato/bbs/custombbs.cgi/, so sue for divorce and division of common property.<br> <br>When the hearing, Ms. Zhang and Mr. Li presented her marriage certificate and booklet to the Court. Registration for two people to live together during Lee made in the name of the property, the very fact that the jointly owned property should belong.<br> <br>During the trial, Mr. Lee acknowledged the very fact that was introduced in 1993 and living together, also recognized the man on the marriage license photo is himself,hogan outlet online,http://120.27.46.248/read.php?tid=17600&ds=1, but he said the name because the name on the marriage certificate and identity card on a same pronunciation Different words; also inconsistent on their marriage certificate and identity card on the date of birth,http://nzdisplay.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=498, and therefore does not recognize the existence of the marriage relationship and the very fact,http://www.hdhome.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=6695, he insisted on not recognize marriage certificate authenticity. The very fact that the booklet submitted, Lee also raised objections to some of the details, and will not be recognized.<br> <br>Lee believes that since there is no marital relationship, he bought houses in 2007 is their personal property, regardless of the very fact that should not be split as jointly owned property.<br> <br>The case is under further investigation process.<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN009)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
Lee also raised objections to some of the details
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.