<br>Newspaper March 25 (Reporter correspondent Zhang Kui Kun Law and Business) books still in the hands did not move, but inside the deposit was less than 40 million inexplicable. Ms. Qian think bank depositors deposit side management flaw, requiring banks to bear responsibility. 25 reporter learned that the court verdict Bank square full payment.<br> <br>By the end of July 2011 One afternoon, Miss Qian holding a passbook when the bank teller business and learned a few hours ago, her passbook deposits have been removed more than 40 million people in 11 outlets at Zibo . But no information on Ms. withdrawals of money passbook.<br> <br>Ms. Qian believes, she opened a bank account held by the bank passbook issued by the two sides have established contractual relations savings banks party to bear the financial security to protect depositors. Her book has not lost custody, deposit bank management to be extracted is flawed,peuterey outlet, not entirely due to security obligations, the responsibility should be borne by banks.<br> <br>The Bank side said Miss Qian failed to provide evidence in Zibo withdrawals were not subject to authorization. In addition,wCEfurfHsp, the Zibo teller who knows Miss Qian ID number and ATM password, and holds a book,f284Xdi5tX, to prove this is Miss Qian did not protect your passbook and password, ID information, causing deposits stolen by others, should Ms. liable by the money themselves.<br> <br>The Court found that,76D6ScI6hN, after Ms. Qian open book, and did not open a bank card and a picture-fold. The court found that the bank did not provide evidence of its party alleged Miss Qian entrust others to advocate withdrawal, so the assertion is not true. Bank of Miss Fang Chengqian disclosure of information resulting deposit is extracted, and there is no evidence, and therefore inadmissible.<br> <br>The court held that Ms Qian in the bank to open an account and make a deposit,dV6760kbJ7, the bank side should try to keep the obligation to ensure the safety of deposits and Ms Qian cash deposits and pay interest at any time. Ms. deposit money had been removed more than 40 million square Zibo commissioned by the bank to the depositor delivered, so losses borne by the bank side. Then the first instance verdict bank party to pay deposits and interest.<br> <br>25,tiffany outlet online, the reporter learned from the court before the discovery deposit was put away, and there is no information on the passbook withdrawals, and in addition to books,5BE0G0LjY0, Ms Qian did not open a bank card and picture-fold, Miss Qian have good evidence that custody his book, the court ruled in favor of Ms. Qian's decision. Currently, the bank refused to accept the ruling party has been appealed.<br> <br>Links & gt; & gt; Qu had also made a similar ruling precedents<br> <br>Ms. Qian case in the first instance verdict on the occasion,PPIYGMyKbH,barbour paris,, the court judges that, in 2010 also had similar cases occurred in Linqu (newspaper March 24, 2010 A11 version of "passbook press bed, inside the money was gone," reported Linqu farming Letter deposits are removed case), the Court has also made a payment obligation CFPA judgment.<br> <br>March 17, 2010, who lives in the village of Dong Dong Linqu rise find their hard-earned money accumulated 40,000 yuan somehow be removed from the books by the ATM machine, the Linqu RCCs said it would not accept any terms responsibility. Shortly after, the contradiction Dong-liter and Linqu CFPA can not solve, playing a lawsuit. Court verdict bank payment obligation. But Linqu agricultural letter to appeal against sentence, CFPA side view, Mr TUNG withdrawals should prove himself not only meet the evidentiary requirements. The investigation did not find the public security organ bank ATM machine itself flawed or because of mismanagement of factual information being stolen by others. Mr TUNG should reject prosecution or termination of the trial to be public security organ has concluded its investigation.<br> <br>Reporters learned that, at the time of the court hearing the case,3K3ash91Ot, the burden of proof that the financial institution has the capacity and conditions should bear the burden of proof. Depositors burden is to prove the existence of a contract between himself and the bank deposit relationships to prove their deposit and passbook number is not lost. As proof ability of banks, it did not fulfill its responsibility to conduct proof the authenticity of unknown cause when the facts of the case,veste canada goose, the associated negative consequences for the bank should also be borne.<br> <br>The trial court staff, told reporters at the bank e-commerce activities, Computer Information Systems service network is in general working mechanism to provide customer service system under the control of a financial institution, may know little loopholes, the transaction process can usually just get the output of a computer, easily tampered with without leaving traces of bills and receipts, apart from the evidence is difficult to come up with effective action required to prove their demands.<br> <br>Customers want to use the computer network of services must be accredited financial institutions to ensure their own interests under the contract, the transaction process is unconditional obedience passive position. In the event of a dispute proceedings, customers and financial institutions are weak compared. Therefore, from the perspective of equity considerations,moncler outlet, as long as the bank depositors to provide proof that can prove the content, the financial institutions should bear the burden of proof.<br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
x14KftU63B
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.