<p> J-20, although not so strong power temporarily and vectored thrust, but through technical research highly aerodynamic configuration and flight control system, but also to achieve a high mobility. Moreover, the J-20 will soon install a better engine and vectoring nozzle. In the ultra-mobility aspect, the J-20 final round is to exceed these three generations ++ Su-35 fighters. In terms of the supersonic cruise.</p>
<p> easy to lose such a small reflective area targets. Therefore, the stealth fighter stealth is not unconditional, but not absolutely impossible to have radar. Do not see the stealth a word, I think what radar can not find. Including stealth, including any of the science and technology, do not blindly be absolute, not blindly be intimidated, but to strive to master its principles to deal with it. If Snow Leopard radar authenticity can indeed reach Russia declared so good, or even if it only reached 70% of claims, the Su-35 to F-35 found on the great distance, can fight with them over the horizon. As F-35 and Su -35 will no absolute overwhelming capacity. Once the combat into close combat phase, from the current situation, the Su-35 should be able to have some obvious advantages. When the F-35 design at the beginning of thinking too well, at least the requirements of mobility than F-16. But if only more than the F-16, I am afraid is not the Su-35 opponent, because mobility really strengthen the Su-35 a lot more than three generations of machines. And now look, F-35 may engage in out future mobility is not so ideal, F-35 and the aircraft is now controversial, and some even say that the Air Force is not as maneuverable F-16. If this thing is true, then the F-35 is certainly not the Su-35 opponents in close combat there. So.</p>
<p> if there is a certain system of support, the Su-35 is indeed possible to fight the F-35. The introduction of Su-35 fighters can not explain -31 F -20 F-die Netizen: China to buy Su-35, is not that our J-20 and J -31 will not work? Liu Linchuan: absolutely not! China's J-20 is a true four generations of machines, although dynamic, temporary drag, dynamic aspects may need to "go step by step." However, in the stealth aspect, the aspect of information are real levels of four generations of machines, these are not such three generations ++ Su-35 fighter comparable. In terms of high mobility.</p>
<p> they do not tell you the same performance for the same properties PK. Specifically explain, if the Su-35 and F-35 combat fight, wishful thinking is what the F-35 - is to use their stealth, covert attacks on the Su-35, Su-35 while trying to avoid entering near from fighting. But this wishful thinking can do,hogan uomo, depends on the Su-35 radar snow leopard face up. Some people claim that "conventional radar simply can not find this F-35 stealth fighter, the Su-35 F-35 sorted out how to play?" Is actually fully understand the line, the lack of technical knowledge. Why do you say that modern radar stealth fighter is not absolutely can not find, but because of the reflection area for common band radar is very small, so it's so ordinary radar detection range significantly reduced. When stealth fighter has been reduced to the first use weapons to attack from the outside when you can be found in the radar, the radar will effect small. In particular, some not so good but also the stealth fighter's radar reflection signals buried in background noise in the signal.</p>
<p> and therefore can not be detected. However, such a stealth fighter for reduced radar reflection area, not for all the bands that are valid, but only effective against some common radar bands in the past, but for some other bands but poor results, even invalid. Specifically, the existing stealth fighter theoretically only effective against operating frequency 0.2 ~ 29GHZ centimeter wave radar, and one especially for the stealth effect 8 ~ 12GHZ the most significant, and for this range on both sides of the stealth effect is not so remarkable. The snow leopard radar as a phased array radar, an important technical advantages of phased array radar is that it can very quickly change the broadband work phase, with good frequency agility capabilities. At the same time easy to control phased array radar main lobe gain, easy to implement adaptive side lobe suppression, the detection capability itself is far superior mechanical scanning radar antenna of the same size. Phased array radar data refresh rate is much higher than mechanically scanned radar reflection area also makes small target detection capability is far better than the mechanical scanning radar.</p>
相关的主题文章：
- http://cand.qee.jp/link_p/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target/
- http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
- http://www.kh.rim.or.jp/~goburin/cgi-bin/custombbs.cgi/
- http://edu.iliema.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=22467&fromuid=5801
- http://mm.kaiye.la/plus/feedback.php?aid=54
- http://120.209.106.37:813/home.php?mod=space&uid=8171
- http://jinantch.igo365.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=8647&fromuid=599
- http://syrup.mints.ne.jp/diary/diary.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=95/