<br>(Reporter Dou Hongmei) near the "May Day" peak wedding, many consumers encounter unequal "King terms" constraints in the process of wedding photography. Yesterday, Xicheng business sector issued a notice of administrative guidance to Xidan stores Mona Lisa and Rome-style studio, make it delete or modify some unfair standard terms. At the same time, the business sector to convene more than 20 studio, studio full specification requirements contract signing behavior.<br> <br>"Photography Copyright belongs to photography company," "the final interpretation of the Company",piumini woolrich, "non-refundable reservation deposit," "add selected unless paid, otherwise the guests may not require sample photos and negatives other than the predetermined set of lines" ...... for wedding custom photography business contract some of the "King terms" and irregularities, the business sector to the studio to explain the relevant provisions of the standard clauses shall not infringe the interests of consumers, the proposed business around the rights and obligations of both parties and the like,nike tn pas cher, to amend the relevant contracts shooting Terms and Conditions.<br> <br>West Chang'an Avenue, the person in charge of Industry and Commerce, Xidan Commercial Street is the city's business district gathered wedding photography,tn reuqin pas cher, according to statistics, only four junctions Xidan intersection to the west side of the street just a few kilometers,http://0898cars.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=7638, it gathered more than 20 wedding. When the same industry operators gathered intensified competition within the industry, the operators through some improper business means harm consumers' legitimate rights and interests of incidents have occurred, especially in certain companies use to develop their own contract terms, leading to an increase in consumer complaints.<br> <br>Yesterday, Xicheng business sector convene major studio Xidan commercial street,louboutin femme, wedding photography business requirements fee shall be set extrasolar prior agreement,http://dayan.chu.jp/DA/apeboard.cgi/\"/, and delete the "final interpretation of all businesses", "photography copyright belongs to photography company," and other similar terms. Furthermore,http://www.kuronowish.com/~yukari/cgi-bin/kontakuto/apeboard_plus.cgi/, in the area of wedding photography services industry,http://lawyerzm.com//review.asp?NewsID=3240&page=36/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp, the full implementation of the "Beijing wedding photography services contract" model text.<br> <br>Commerce and Industry Reviews<br> <br>Studio most concentrated three "King terms"<br> <br>1,http://www.ito.dz/spip.php?article74, the photographs are copyrighted by studio<br> <br>The business sector believe that this agreement violated the "illegal contract oversight approach" Article 11 sixth, below exclude "other rights which shall be enjoyed by consumers." Operators expand their rights, it is unfair to consumers, unreasonable, not integrity. Wedding photography studio shooting for consumers belonging to accept commissioned work. According to the relevant provisions of the "Copyright Law",http://ahui123.cn/bbs/read.php?tid=1450749&ds=1&page=e#a], by the commissioned work, copyright ownership by the principal and the agent by the contract; the contract is not clearly stipulated or no contract, the copyright belongs to the trustee. In reality,nike tn pas cher,http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, most consumers do not realize they have the right to contract with the studio agreed to by photos copyright ownership.<br> <br>2, interpretation studio<br> <br>Mona Lisa photography Ltd. Beijing Xidan store in format prepared in terms of their own stated, "this book single final interpretation of all of the Company", Beijing Roman style wedding photography, Ltd. noted in the format prepared in terms of their own " interpretation of the Company for all. " The business sector finds a violation of the agreement "right interpretation of the standard terms," "illegal contract oversight approach" Article 11 of the Fourth,http://qufilm.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=105885, belongs to exclude consumers.<br> <br>3, designated to pay "deposit" shall reclaim<br> <br>The business sector, the "studio invariably use the 'deposit' rather than 'deposit' for a reason. Deposit and deposit completely different interpretation of the law, can pay a deposit back, and pay a deposit of default after the consumer has no right to demand the return . "Therefore, businesses targeting consumers pay" deposit ", in violation of the" illegal contract oversight approach "Article 10 third, increased consumer responsibility.<br> (Edit: SN009)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
the contract is not clearly stipulated or no contract
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.