DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

fljFTGcl95

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by ghisjJl7g1

  1. <br>Anke next passenger car, failing to pay attention to see the road open car door, causing an electric car collided with their doors, electric car driver died a death. Anke couple after filing a claim to the insurance company to compensate the families of the victims, but the insurance company is "to take the person who causes the accident is not liable for compensation" as a reason to refuse payment of all payments.<br> <br>Recently, Songjiang District Court of first instance verdict on the case, the insurance company should pay the full reasonable compensation 620,000 yuan.<br> <br>Car door accidentally call the motor car drivers killed<br> <br>Anke ride by the husband Mr. Wu driving cars go after street parking,qfEF98j5q4, Anke open the door to get off. At this time,NjNRV2Fjdl, just an electric car rapidly approaching and hit the door, the electric car drivers lorry fell, He died and killed.<br> <br>The traffic police department, Mr. Wu and Ms. Ho bear equal responsibility for the accident, the electric car driver no responsibility. Later, Mr. Wu couple reached a settlement agreement with the deceased,f1YXfL9eX5, common compensation for death,bicEn6iv1o,louboutin pas cher,wmSdzk1t74, moral damages solatium 66.5 million yuan. Wu couple then found insurance company claims, but the insurance company to "take people to accident caused no liability" as an excuse, just paid the driver Wu negative accident liability, totaling 36.4 million yuan. Wu To this end insurance company to court.<br> <br>The insurer refused to take the liability for compensation<br> <br>Insurance Companies in the trial, said Ms Ho is the car ride rather than the insured person. Compulsory insurance, third party liability insurance in terms of insurance contract,louboutin femme, the insurer of the accident the insured person or his designated driver legitimate place in the process of using a motor vehicle liability, so the insurer to lead people by the occupant The accident is not liable for damages. Insurance companies re-approved loss compensation total amount of more than 60 million,tn reuqin pas cher,gtSlC31o8e, paid in the compulsory insurance of 120,zmn1sazd4Y,000 yuan,moncler outlet milano, the remaining money to Wu equal responsibility for the negative 50% calculated as 24.4 million yuan.<br> <br>Owners jointly bear responsibility for the insurance of passengers should be compensated<br> <br>The Court held that liability insurers subject to the external responsibilities,rcq4HMhanm, and this accident Foreign joint responsibility borne by Mr. Wu and Ms. Ho, so Wu of foreign insurance companies should be jointly and severally liable to the negative limit, assume the insurance liability. Although the insurance company is entitled to exercise the right of recourse to the other person on the basis of joint and several liability of insurance subrogation. But it serves as equally responsible third party, and Mr. Wu is the relationship between husband and wife,woolrich outlet italia, so the insurance company's loss of Anke recourse. For this purpose the court made the ruling.<br> <br>Correspondent Wang reporter Song Ninghua<br><br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.