DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

can be regarded as only one gift for their children

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by pf6xS3xA2Sa

  1. <br>Because no outsiders on Beijing accounts, real estate license only husband's name. My husband asked for a divorce want to monopolize the room,louboutin soldes femme, for the prosecution, Ms. Jing to court, asking the court to confirm their total ownership of housing. Yesterday,http://www.menqiu.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, reporters learned, Fengtai District Court based on the new "Marriage judicial interpretation of the three" involved in housing should be identified personal property belonging to her husband, the judgment dismissed Ms. Jing. This is also the Supreme People's Court issued "on the application (People's Republic of China Marriage Law) Interpretation of Several Issues Three", the city's first-related cases.<br> <br>Housing wife requested a total of<br> <br>Plaintiff Ms. Jing recalled that she and Lee on August 16, 2006 registration of marriage, marriage parties in January 2007 mortgage to buy a set of affordable housing, the total price of 400,000 yuan. Buy a house,scarpe hogan online, she did not Beijing accounts, husband Lee have Beijing hukou. Because involved in housing can only be purchased by people who have a Beijing hukou,http://www.health8.com/cgi-bin/yybbs/yybbs.cgi, they are in the process of registration of property rights transfer, the only record of Lee's name, the name of Ms. Jing failed to record.<br> <br>Ms. Jing said that when she and Lee co-payment to buy a house down payment, joint loans, and later,doudoune moncler soldes, the two-income families in order to jointly repay the loan principal and interest so far. Today, Lee made various reasons want to divorce her, and refused to real estate license in the name of her department, has exclusive property of meaning. In order to safeguard their rights, she requested the court to confirm their total ownership of housing involved.<br> <br>Husband says parents financed the house<br> <br>The defendant does not agree with Ms. Li Jing view. Lee said that the first payment is involved in housing their parents financed the house registered in his own name, is his personal gift,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/gion/md718ja.html, he never filed for divorce several times. Lee believes that, under the new "Marriage judicial interpretation of the three" relevant provisions involved in housing should be recognized as a spouse's personal property, he asked Ms. Jing rejected the demands.<br> <br>To prove his claim, Mr. Lee brought his mother to testify. As a witness,http://www.yqtxt.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Mr. Li's mother said her son Lee offered to buy a house, she and her husband accompanied his son and daughter to see the room together, she gave her son a total of more than 170,000 yuan for the purchase. Ms. Li Jing mother does not recognize the witness statement,louboutin soldes pas cher, she said that marriage also financed the purchase of their parents, as well as jointly purchase money in deposits.<br> <br>■ court<br> <br>All personal property owned by husband<br> <br>Fengtai court held that involved in housing is Ms. Jing and Li during the marital relationship continues to buy, but the purchase of the first payment system to pay Lee's mother, Lee property rights registration in the name, according to interpret the relevant provisions of the three new marriage law judicial, married parents financed by one party for the children to buy real estate,http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/read.cgi, property rights registered in the name of the investor children,http://www.colepicasso.es/spip.php?article159, can be regarded as only one gift for their children, the estate should be recognized as a spouse's personal property. Involved in housing should be part of Lee's personal property, the plaintiff asked to confirm Ms. Jing is jointly owned property,doudoune moncler femme,http://www.xq0757.com/read.php?tid=1038513, the court not support it.<br> <br>However,http://101.200.1.91/read.php?tid=76832&ds=1, the court pointed out that the tax paid in the purchase process and after the mortgage, the original use of the common property of the defendant to pay the couple, so if the original defendant appear after divorce cases, divorce should be given to the other house owner compensation. Accordingly, the court dismissed the claims of Ms. Jing.<br> <br>Morning News reporter Wu Xin<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN056)<br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.