<br>(Reporter Movies intern Tang Yingying) & nbsp; When home owners in the decoration, washbasin pipeline leaks, water has spread to the elevator, causing damage to the elevator 12 boards, the property company to pay the maintenance fee in advance of 67,http://115.28.54.169/read.php?tid=161994&ds=1,000 yuan. Property company believes that damage caused by elevator owners,http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, owners need to repay their maintenance costs. Negotiated high, the property company owner paper petition to court. The court verdict, the property company did not sue because the qualification,http://www.ampadulcechacon.org/spip.php?article1, dismissed the action. Yesterday, after the property company received a notice to the court ruling, again appealed.<br> <br>Leaky home owners suffer along elevator<br> <br>"We sued the owner is quite upset." Yesterday, Washington Sands Property Services Center Project Manager ZHANG Yong-sheng said that last May 12 at 7 pm, the staff during routine inspections of residential buildings 2 corridor, found the elevator four weeks seepage. Staff will report the situation after, and quickly lift the main power is turned off. After checking found that because of water seepage on the 4th floor of 28 home owners in the basin water pipes burst,hogan rebel, causing water to flow out of the door into the hallway.<br> <br>The next two days, the property management company had to find an elevator maintenance company to repair the elevator. Maintenance costs 67,tiffany italia,000 yuan spent a property management company. "Out of consideration for the owners, the company paid the money in advance." Last year in June, due to unsuccessful negotiations with the owners,http://www.hnyxbg.com/news/html/?83531.html,moncler outlet, the property company hired a lawyer, the owners of the 4th report on the court,http://www.valdrespaintball.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi, to the owners of the money to pay .<br> <br>First Instance dismissed: property management not qualified to appeal<br> <br>In February, Qingyang Court conducted a hearing,barbour france, the court held that the case should be filed by the industry committee or litigation of all owners, property companies are not subject to prosecute.<br> <br>Does that mean that the 67,000 yuan by the property management company to bear it? The judge said that if property companies continue to appeal, there are two options. First, the property company can sue all the owners,louboutin pas cher, requiring all owners to repay 67,000 yuan,http://www.tm-sports.co.jp, then sue all the owners by the owners on the 4th. Second, property management companies can not because of the ground (that are not a statutory obligation or agreement,http://verdamilio.info/org/spip.php?article906, the interests of others in order to avoid losses, behavior management services for others),http://0551mdn.com/news/html/?285281.html, sued the owners on the 4th.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
J5E9vPIvOS
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.