<br>When the Nanfang Daily (Reporter / Liu Guannan correspondent Zhaoqi Yu / Liu Hongguo) driver's license road test,http://japan.renesas.com,scarpe louboutin outlet, no auxiliary equipment recorded the examination process, the results are determined by the on-site examiners one person. Guangzhou citizens Chen because of dissatisfaction with the examiner's judgment, the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau to court, Guangzhou Yuexiu District Court yesterday for a public hearing on the case. According to reports, this is the first case in Guangzhou is not due to test drive and sued by traffic police cases.<br> <br>2 o'clock yesterday afternoon, reporters participate as observers in Guangzhou Yuexiu court hearing in the case. The defendant Guangzhou City Public Security Bureau sent two legal officers responding.<br> <br>30-year-old Guangzhou residents sued Chen said that he began to apply in July 2010 a driver's license, passed a written subjects and subjects two inverted pile examination after July 8 this year, took part in the road test three subjects.<br> <br>After the road test, Chen received the test failed Vehicle Administration issued a notice, the examiner did not tell her any reason. And as she recalled, it may be when to pull away from the roadbed from some lost points. "I think parking off road remote entry point is a deduction, but it gave me the opportunity to re-operation, it should not be directly sentenced me to fail, and does not give the opportunity to make-up."<br> <br>Because of dissatisfaction with the examiner's practice, Chen on July 15 this year for administrative reconsideration to the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau, called for the repeal "unqualified notice." Police accepted, on September 15 to make a decision to extend the review. The receipt of administrative reconsideration on October 13 after nearly three months, police believe the plaintiff to apply for administrative reconsideration does not belong to the scope of accepting cases of administrative reconsideration, dismissed the application for administrative reconsideration.<br> <br>Chen said, the examiner later make up a reason, and told she could make-up, she was lying because I think the examiner, so it to court, asked the court to dismiss the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau application for administrative reconsideration illegal.<br> <br>■ focus of the trial<br> <br>After the court investigation,canada goose pas cher, the presiding judge summed up the case there are two focal issues: The first is Vehicle Administration made "unqualified notice" whether administrative action; secondly, the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau rejected the administrative reconsideration of behavior is legal.<br> <br>For these two issues, the defendant believes that the behavior of a driver's license issued by an administrative behavior, but the driving test is divided into three different subjects, Vehicle performance test subjects for three of the plaintiffs made "unqualified notice" is one of only one part is not independent of foreign produce legal effects, and therefore does not belong to the administrative act, it is not within the scope of administrative reconsideration.<br> <br>The plaintiff argued that the three subjects do not pass, driver's license exam is bound not by the defendant to the issue split apart and dismissed the reconsideration belong omission. The plaintiff said that the examiner in violation of examination standards, the situation has a direct assessment only points of failure, abuse of discretion,http://98.131.129.31/ss/?action-viewcomment-itemid-4136, and did not press the Ministry of Public Security, "motor vehicle driver's license to apply for and use the term" Article 31 the plaintiff shall be given the opportunity to make-up time. At the same time there is no reason to inform her exam failed.<br> <br>For the plaintiff accused the defendant not recognized, and the burden of proof that the examiner in the transcript successful plaintiff failed to understand the reason was "wavering inside lane obvious," "poor control of the vehicle."<br> <br>For the two sides argued for their own, the presiding judge asked the police agents focused, assess the nature of the subject and how the test scores.<br> <br>The defendant replied, assessment test scores of the three main subjects is a qualified examiner, on behalf of the Vehicle Administration. The driver's license issued by a body that police detachment,http://www.idyllarbor.com/research/search.cgi, the two are not the same thing.<br> <br>"The plaintiff said the examiner abuse of discretion, we did not examine the contents of these entities." By the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau, said, "the results notice" only to the plaintiff failed to inform the accomplishments and explain the reasons, is not independent of external legal effect, does not affect the plaintiff equity obligations. Application for administrative reconsideration does not belong to the plaintiff by the scope of administrative reconsideration,spaccio peuterey, directly from the form thus dismissed.<br> <br>In this regard,moncler outlet online,http://www.girodivite.it/spip.php?article706, the plaintiff side expressed strong dissatisfaction that not only should the administrative review, and should review the entity content.<br> <br>■ expert analysis<br> <br>After nearly two hours of the trial, the court did not in court for sentencing.<br> <br>Chen told reporters after the hearing the plaintiff,http://www.chlib.org/Review.asp?NewsID=374, if the application make-up, she must then pay 300 yuan, she believes there are many opaque driving test,doudoune canada goose, we need to be perfect from the system.<br> <br>"Why prolong the review period for administrative reconsideration? Review of nearly three months without touching solid content, whether administrative review department too mechanical?" After the trial,http://www.xmarks.com/s/site/www.tadayumi.sakura.ne.jp/apeboard_plus.cgi/, reporters asked about the work on these issues to participate in the trial of the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau Legal Department personnel. The other said,http://www.scriptsearch.com, according to the law,http://www.gftcy.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=207407, the plaintiff Chen can always apply make-up within two years, dismissed the review does not affect her rights. For other problems, the other did not respond.<br> <br>"This is actually a widespread problem, the examination process itself can not be excluded bribes to pass the exam the examiner, or the examiner determines the possibility of deliberately failing." Will be a legal expert analysis Guangdong Province law, if the driver's license exam three subjects with subjective conduct determination, but the lack of auxiliary recording supervision, there is bound to score not objective debate. Once litigation, should actually take burden of proof methods, the results issued by the party to be demonstrated in the form of evidence. Can not prove, shall bear the burden of proof is not the responsibility. In other words, it should be recorded and retained the examination process, or complete make-up examination and appeal rules within a certain time limit.<br> <br>Reporters from the traffic police department learned that at present, Guangzhou driving test subjects go through a (written), two subjects (inverted pile, nine selected three) and three subjects (road test). Among them, the subjects written one computer, two subjects from April 1 this year to achieve the "unmanned road test", while three subjects or to judge by the examiner.<br> <br>According to traffic police official said, by the end of July this year, a three-way test subjects also began installation of a portable test recorder, recording the examination process.<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
For the plaintiff accused the defendant not recognized
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.