DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

beyond the loss of these two cross-strong insurance limits

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by lpajv693406

  1. <br>Xinhua Guangzhou February 18 (reporter a bamboo hair) two o'clock,louboutin femme, a man lying on the viaduct was run over by two cars of death. 17, reporters from Dongguan City,http://www.menqiu.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Guangdong Province, the third People's Court learned that the deceased mother of the insurance company and one of the perpetrators of their companies to court, sue for compensation for 63 million yuan. By the court to determine the compensation of the deceased 310,000 yuan, the loss shared by two driver, because one of them is the courier company freight drivers, losses from the accident to pay high insurance payment; another run driver, the insurance company in advance compensation,http://yuanmengyi.com/read.php?tid=71708&ds=1, escape party and then separately identified claims.<br> <br>The Court found that, at 2:00 on April 29,moncler outlet italia,http://tom-baessler.de/spip.php?article1, 2013,http://www.tsyhmm.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3907019, the driver Mou driving a courier company in Dongguan Zhangmutou branch of the truck after submittal Dongguan City Zhenmou viaduct, on the occasion of the oncoming vehicle bridge the glaring beam Light forcing Limou Shaopian point direction, after the car will move Limou back to the positive direction. Until noon the next day, Mou was summoned to the police department, before we know it in the middle of the road viaduct recline on a middle-aged man to a, Mou vehicle after leaving another vehicle rolling over to a, to certain death on the spot.<br> <br>After the transfer of the traffic police department to the scene of video found in ten minutes before the accident in the middle-aged man walked unsteadily from a distance range of video surveillance,http://www.foss.lk/comment/profile.php?uid=82, then slowly pour in the trouble-prone sections. Section of the incident relatively dim lights, one after another, there are many vehicles pass, only Li Mou and another car through the rolling to a middle-aged man. After extensive investigation, the traffic police to the accident found that the driver identified Mou and another co-driver of the vehicle can not identify the primary responsibility for the accident, to a negative secondary responsibility for the accident.<br> <br>After the incident, the driver caused a traffic accident Mou was sentenced to three months imprisonment for two years. The mother of a paper petition to the driver Mou, the owner of a courier company and the insurance company to court to require compensation for all of the above three accident losses 63 million yuan.<br> <br>Case in the trial process,air max 90 pas cher, Li Mou where a courier company in Dongguan Zhangmutou branch and I have said Mou,woolrich outlet, Li Mou incident is engaged in work duties,http://www.1pageanswer.com/?qa=81850/but-in-the-name-of-ms-shao-took-away-the-money-in-addition,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, although proceedings,http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4018, Zhangmutou branch business registration has been canceled, but the Courier companies expressed their willingness to be held accountable.<br> <br>Insurance companies and courier companies for a deceased mother to urban per capita disposable income in accordance with the request to pay compensation for death objection, the burden of proof cross-examination by the parties, the court finds in accordance with urban per capita disposable income of less than the amount of compensation calculated evidence, rural per capita net income in accordance with standards calculated as 21 million yuan, the two sides should pay moral damages solatium 50,000 yuan, plus travel expenses, funeral expenses, dependents living expenses and other costs, the amount of compensation totaling 31 million yuan.<br> <br>Dongguan Third People's Court that the purpose of the establishment of cross-strong insurance to protect accident victims is timely access to basic economic aid,http://bbs.uoosong.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3957232, according to "People's Republic of China on Road Traffic Safety Law" and relevant judicial interpretations, the loss should have been a thorough investigation accident vehicle accident The cross-strong insurance Xianxingpeifu then be borne by Anonymous one vehicle in a pay high insurance limit; beyond the loss of these two cross-strong insurance limits, due to the traffic police department investigation found the driver Limou Hears a total bear the main responsibility for the accident, Li Mou and Anonymous rolling behavior common cause harm to a result of death, can not determine the size of responsibility between Mou and anonymous, so in addition to pay high insurance compensation limit and then to a deduction of 20 percent to bear, Mou Hears a loss for the average liability. After the verdict, the two sides were not appealed.<br> (Edit: SN095)<br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.