DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

Mr. Han was again struck his head

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by slvkdoip0p

Tags:


  1. <br>12 minutes suffered two vehicles hit head is difficult to judge which car to cause death<br> <br>Text / correspondent correspondent Cao Yan charter<br> <br>A man was small truck struck his head, after 12 minutes will again hit another car head coach, died. Two driver,louboutin soldes femme, how to take responsibility? Yesterday, reporters learned that the case after Xingning court sentenced two drivers average liability.<br> <br>Knocked again pick up parts<br> <br>Last year at 14:33 on February 19,http://chenxiaozheng.com/news/html/?77628.html, Mr. Han riding a small motorcycle crossing into the Township of Xingning City, North Long road, was hit Danmou driving a small truck, Han immediately head face bleeding injured, motorcycles were damaged.<br> <br>Mr. Han from the ground up, pulled over a small truck, and with Danmou representations. Danmou the small truck parked on the roadside, he went to the middle of the road to pick up Mr. Han motorcycle scattered parts.<br> <br>2 day 45 minutes or so, Mr. Han saw two vehicles coming in opposite directions, then gesturing to allow drivers to bypass. Bypassing the first car,http://www.xinkeji.com.cn/news/html/?9013.html, but followed by a second vehicle driven by the Lee coach,doudoune moncler pas cher, since their view is obstructed and hit Mr. Han, Mr. Han was again struck his head, down the road.<br> <br>8 days later, Mr. Han death, reason for the special severe brain injury diagnosis, hernia.<br> <br>Police found two vehicles of different responsibilities<br> <br>In the first traffic accident, police believe the driver Han did not conduct regular safety and technical inspection of two motorcycles on the road, via the passage,nike tn pas cher, did not allow normal passage of vehicles priority,woolrich outlet, should bear the main responsibility; Danmou driving brake trucks do not meet the technical standards on the road, should bear secondary responsibility.<br> <br>Second the accident,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/mamapan/70020018.html, the traffic police is that Lee did not get a driving license, driver's brake does not comply with the technical standards of ordinary medium-sized passenger cars on the road, negligence, dangerous situations should be found not in time,http://www.szsgjq.com/news/html/?17567.html, it is caused by an accident The main reason, should bear the main responsibility; Han to stay in the roadway,louboutin femme, shall bear secondary responsibility.<br> <br>Two drivers sharing over 860,http://juan.linkko.com/node/add/article,000 indemnity<br> <br>After the incident, Mr. Han wife and children will Danmou, Lee and small trucks compulsory insurance underwriting and insurance company A third party liability insurance underwriting insurance company B together to court seeking compensation for medical expenses, funeral expenses and other total more than 860,000 yuan.<br> <br>After the court hearing that the two vehicles were hit by parts of the head, in particular the consequences of death is difficult to determine which vehicles.<br> <br>According to "Tort Law" states: "If two or more separately tort cause the same damage, it is possible to determine the magnitude of the responsibility, to assume their respective responsibilities; the responsibility is difficult to determine the size of the average liability." Thus,http://wsg120451654.w617.en.tm/home.php?mod=space&uid=4038&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=122716, according to the law should Danmou, Lee lethal injuries to Mr. Han average liability.<br> <br>Determine responsibility is crucial trial<br> <br>Attn judge noted that the victim is subjected to twice or more times hit lethal traffic accident damages cases, depending on the specific circumstances of each case,http://kaito1412.com/kid/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=801162/, the verdict different. However, the legal basis for the decision is nothing more than a "Tort Liability Act," the relevant provisions of Article 11 and Article 12. In other words, "no - intention communication majority infringement" case, can determine the size of the liability, shall bear their respective responsibilities; it is difficult to determine the size of the liability, the average liability; everyone infringement are sufficient to cause all the damage , the perpetrator jointly and severally liable.<br> <br>In practice, the trial of such cases, to determine the responsibility is the key, especially in the case of responsibility is difficult to determine, should reasonably be applied average liability or joint liability. On the one hand, to the actual analysis of the degree of harm is sufficient to produce a single infringement all the consequences of the damage; on the other hand,http://www.tenipa.net/16/cgi-bin/memo/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=60/, pay attention to protect the interests of victims, as much as possible to achieve the goal of victim compensation benefits.<br><br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.