and it does not already exist « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

and it does not already exist

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by slkiIh0p2

Tags:

slkiIh0p2
Member

 Years ago, American movie "Entrapment", the male and female, two thieves, when the use of the banking system inventory 10 seconds of the time difference, the $ 8 billion secretly to his own account. Ningbo has a cottage version of "Entrapment", twelve minutes of time a few young people, the use of POS machines, UnionPay banking system and the transmission of information is poor, set away 180,000 yuan. The day before yesterday afternoon, Haishu People's Court heard the case. Three defendants charged with theft (financial institutions) sin. As the guilty, and the amount involved is especially huge, they could face life imprisonment. However,http://www.mapfan.com/routemap/routeset.cgi, the defendant and the defense lawyer, said this conduct did not constitute a crime. POS machine credit card transactions have twelve minutes "loophole" Participate in the "bureau", a total of five people, this was indicted three people were Zhao Sichuan, Jiangsu, Zhang and Wang, all of them are only 20 years old,louboutin pas cher, and both handled separately. In March 14th 4:30 pm, Zhang, Wang and Chen (handled separately) went to the Bank of China branch in Danfeng Xiangshan branch to transact business. Zhang presented a credit card account, out of 50,000 yuan in cash, no deposit accounts. After money in counter staff, he asked Zhang to sign to confirm. Zhang Xu secretly given in different places (handled separately) a call. After more than a minute, Zhang suddenly counter staff said, the money in the wrong account, and asked the counter staff put money into another account. Counter staff because his request,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001084013.html,doudoune moncler femme, the money transferred to another account Zhang. The minute there, so what happened? In fact, when Zhang first put 50,000 yuan deposit, are in different places Xu, immediately through POS machines, the money brushed away 49,980 yuan. However, this credit card transaction information POS machines,http://www.tenipa.net/16/cgi-bin/memo/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=85/\"/, have twelve minutes later to feedback from the CUP system to the bank. Counter staff also kept in the dark,moncler outlet milano, do not know the Zhang 50,000 yuan deposit accounts just really has not, and it does not already exist, "50,000 yuan," Zhang again dump another account, this 50,000 yuan then they are taken now. As a result, the group will earn $ 50,000. March 19th, the 20th, they use the same means they did three times, set away from a bank 13 million yuan. March 24, when they again see through Haishu District, a branch of Guangdong Development Bank crime. Zhang, Zhao, Wang has been arrested. Three people accused of the crime of theft of financial institutions August 18, Haishu court heard the case publicly. Procuratorate charged three people on charges of theft (financial institutions) sin. On court, three defendants all plausibly: They just found a loophole in the banking system, and then use this vulnerability to do credit card cash proxy only,http://periscopewebvideo.com/user/65389/fbconnect, credit card cash illegal not illegal. "We were wrong in knowing the amount of cash deposited in Cary has also lied to the wrong memory requirements deposited into another card ......" "We publish news on the Internet, which provides credit card cash, and charge a fee. Is the customer automatically find the door to our help." The defendant said the commission of 42%. Cash $ 10,000 they received 4,200 yuan. No illegal encroachment on their subjective wishes,http://www.postyournipples.com, but on behalf of all people to do things, fee collection points only. 3 people said, the banking system itself, there are technical flaws, also has its own responsibility. Zhang vowed: "cardholder to make a written guarantee, money in the bank they will go further,http://bjdygroup.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=5176195&fromuid=28793, we have to do their business in the repayment of the cardholder.." Lawyers suddenly changed into innocence A defense attorney began to do is Zuiqing defense,http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3441, when there is evidence that the cardholder has after the repayment, lawyers suddenly changed pleaded not guilty in court. Lawyers believe that this case, on the POS machine credit card spending,scarpe hogan online, temporary changes sign at the counter deposit accounts, these acts are legitimate and to be recognized bank, lawful behavior causes unreasonable consequences,http://115.29.109.79/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2399465, the vulnerability is caused by the bank. Counsel argues that three acts and illegal possession of subjective will not, because already in the repayment of the cardholder. "The 180,000 yuan in cash, 100,000 yuan by the cardholder to pay off the remaining 80,000 yuan, the defendant indicated that they would go to work, trying to put up the money returned to the bank before the three of them do not have any criminal record." Counsel pointed out that this is a new type of credit card cash, "nullum crimen sine conviction", "it is a significant misunderstanding revocable civil behavior." Charges possible And "Xu Ting Case" as Controversial For various reasons, the defendants and lawyers, the prosecution played an analogy: a family man of the house is not locked, someone take advantage looted, this behavior is still to be regarded as theft. The prosecutor that the defendant grabbed POS machine feedback to the bank's twelve minutes time difference, 10 days crime five times, set to go the bank 18 million yuan, a huge amount of theft should set up. After the trial ended yesterday, the judge did not in court for sentencing. The judge said the case belongs to the new types of cases, the first case in the Ningbo range, and once the "Xu Ting Case" Similarly,doudoune moncler soldes, on charges of qualitative highly controversial. Because the defendant requested to provide new evidence that the cardholder issued guarantee, does not require the defendant to assume responsibility for repayment, it will be another day Haishu court hearing. Reporters learned that, after the incident, some of the banks have to take appropriate measures to stop the deposit Reversal revoke business. If the deposit to a customer account, before the signature confirmation want dump another account, you have to first sign to confirm, and then remove the money dump. □ correspondent Chen Ying Li Yishan Chen Xiang told reporters in Ningbo 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.