DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

moncler donna

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by txk48uqpll

Tags:


  1. <p> the aircraft carrier fleet allocation might have a special advantage. Aircraft carrier battle groups in determining the direction of development at the same time, China needs to solve a huge number of very complex and technical issues. You first need to face is the power system. "Liaoning ship" Soviet steam turbine equipment is used by most large ships,nike air jordan pas cher, China's new aircraft carrier built in the future may choose nuclear power plant - China has had to experience in submarine design reactors with nuclear-powered aircraft carrier will promote Development of the system. In any case,peuterey prezzi, the development of nuclear power for the aircraft systems will cost China a lot of time. Therefore,http://shop.luzirq.com/news/html/?143490.html, China will continue to build the first new aircraft carrier will be used as a steam turbine power plant. In fact,abercrombie paris, the current national plan all the equipment carrier have experienced development path from the steam turbine transition to a nuclear power plant. For example.</p>

    <p> the US Navy at the same time until the beginning of this century still equipped with two power units using two types of aircraft carrier "Kitty Hawk" aircraft carrier ship equipped with a steam turbine which last until 2009 before retiring. France from the mid-1990s began to build the first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier - "Charles de Gaulle". Prior to this,barbour pas cher, the Soviet Union also plans to build its first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier - "Ulyanovsk" sign. However,http://eye.catfood.jp/kousin5/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=40//鈥?/,moncler outlet, due to economic, political and other aspects of the ship's construction work is full of twists and turns from the outset,abercrombie fitch, in the post-Soviet, its construction plan was eventually canceled. As we all know,http://ww.baochunsteel.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=43411,barbours, China in the process of "Varyag" was converted into "Liaoning ship" in completely abandoned the anti-ship missile system. This way,barbour international, "Liaoning ship" has the sole means of attack would only carrier-based fighter - the F-15. In the last 10 years,http://bbs.jbgdg.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=43133&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=103957, China has been actively promoting the J-15 carrier-based fighter heavy development program. Previously, the Chinese unauthorized imitation Sukhoi Su-27 events,moncler outlet, leading ultimately rejected Russia's exports to China Su-33 carrier-based aircraft. It is reported that China has been seeking to buy two Su -33 for the "Assessment", while the Russian side raised the minimum purchase amount is 48. Unable to reach an agreement,louboutin paris, China finally had to purchase a Ukrainian Su-33 prototype - a legacy of the Soviet era T-10K,hogan online,http://tspwind.com/FORUM/home.php?mod=space&uid=115223, and eventually to the machine as a blueprint developed the F-15. According to Chinese media propaganda, a major advantage of the J-15 is its ability to attack ground targets. Su-33 weapons in the configuration table, also includes non-guided bombs 500 kg class and various types of rockets. Russia had tried during the test machine is equipped with X-41 "Sandfly child" anti-ship missiles.</p>

    <p> Chinese people is not technically beyond today's Russia,tn, but in the late eighties of the last century,louboutin femme pas cher, the Soviet Union. In fact, if compared to the US F -15 new and improved F / A-18 carrier-based aircraft,nike tn pas cher, the former may not account for any advantage after. This needs to be noted that the J-15 time official armed forces will no earlier than 2014, in the coming years, China will not be able to fight against the developed countries have the new aircraft carrier-based fighter. Even China has successfully solved all the problems in the construction of new aircraft carriers and modern aircraft carrier aspect,abercrombie roma, which still have to face a series of problems.</p>

    <p> but mass production of the Su-33 but does not have the ability to carry such weapons. The objective,http://bbs.97lab.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=41854,air max mujer, the Su-33 is the first to be used as an air defense fighter, whose main task is to provide protection for the fleet of air-to-ground attack capability is only an added. As for China's J-15, although not yet released information about its precise weapons configuration, there is reason to believe that its ground attack capability is very limited. If China wants to build a standard in accordance with the American aircraft carrier fleet,veste barbour, then it must be supporting the development of guided weapons as the F-15. For information on the F -15 airborne electronic equipment is also very limited. Chinese experts claim that computing power with the J-15 Su-33 several times higher. However, if the lack of other performance equivalent equipment, performance onboard computer may not be able to give full play. For example, the poor performance of the radar would limit the release of computer potential. Interestingly, still no information about the publication of the J-15 radar. Although there are media said aircraft is equipped with active phased array radar,http://bbs.e0858.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=217095, but the news is very doubtful. In any case,tn pas cher, the performance of various mechanisms of electronic equipment only to maintain balance in order to maximize performance. We have to admit that the performance of the F-15 airborne electronic equipment and computer systems are likely to be better than the Su-33. The reason behind the Russian-made fighter happen is obvious. T-10K first flight was on 25 years ago, and the J-15 is in the first flight two years ago,http://www.kankan369.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=147239&fromuid=65109, 20 years time could not affect the performance of the airborne equipment. In fact, even the J-15 is indeed on the parameters are superior to the Su-33.</p>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.