DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

1 year after the incident

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by rekviIn4i1

  1. <br>Court: the company did not have the security obligations<br> <br>Guangzhou Daily (Reporter correspondent charter Dunblane) brawl occurred in the staff quarters, where the company should not bear the "security obligations"? Early morning dormitory colleagues came to play drinking games, but also open the audio music, for which triggered a dispute between co-workers, resulting in one death. Family of the deceased that the unit related personnel at the scene did not discourage, alarm management loopholes, claim 310,000 yuan compensation unit. Yesterday, the Guangzhou City Luogang District Court rejected the demands of the families, that the company did not have the security obligations, without liability.<br> <br>A strong Archie and with a company working in Luogang District. September 6, 2012 at 1 pm, when Archie relax in the company security officer quarters, live in the hostel with a few beers A strong security captain with drink and chat together, still in the dorm room playing computer games and music. Archie was then awakened to require A strong decrease volume,http://www.china-bygc.com:8071/news/html/?215735.html, but A strong disagree, the two sides quarrel and then fighting each other to this end. In the meantime,hogan outlet online, Archie took out a fruit knife to A strong chest,moncler pas cher, arms, legs stabbed several knives,http://www.keishicho.metro.tokyo.jp, causing him died on the spot.<br> <br>After the incident, Archie A strong family to the family 50,000 yuan compensation for mental solatium, the families of Archie A strong showing some degree of understanding. Meanwhile,http://pleappl.tumblr.com, the company also paid 83,000 yuan grants to A strong families, and indicate that the fee includes funeral subsidies, to support immediate family members a one-time relief payment.<br> <br>Found guilty of intentional assault, Archie was sentenced to 11 years, but was sentenced to compensate the families A strong RMB 2.8 million yuan loss.<br> <br>Families sued the company was rejected by the court<br> <br>1 year after the incident, once again A strong father Archie and companies to court, that the company officials at the scene did not discourage, alarm, rescue, management loopholes, resulting in Archie successfully fled the scene, and finally led to bloodshed A strong excess deaths.<br> <br>A strong father that the company failed to fulfill its security obligations, there is no fault, should bear tort liability, Archie requirements associated with the company 31 million yuan in compensation payments.<br> <br>In this regard, the company that its not bear tort liability, the Company is not the operator, NA "security obligations" "Tort Liability Act,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/frogberry/rfa030.html," the provisions of the victims were employees of the company, and the company's labor relations rather than the existence of consumer contract relationship. To say the least, even if the company should bear the "security obligations" compensation compensation obligation is assumed within the scope of fault, and the company has done to the security obligations within reasonable limits, there is no fault.<br> <br>A strong Luogang Court dismissed the father's appeal. The court held that Archie has assumed obligation to compensate them in the criminal with the civil judgment, but the company and there is no security obligations.<br> <br>Judges say: the company does not have a fault<br> <br>Attn judge noted,louboutin femme, according to the organizers, "Tort Liability Act," the relevant provisions, hotels, shopping malls, banks, railway stations, entertainment venues and other public places or mass activities,http://www.geosociety.jp, failed to fulfill its security obligations, causing damage to others, We shall assume the tort liability. Due to the behavior of a third party causes harm to another, shall be borne by the third party tort liability; managers or organizers failed to fulfill its security obligations, and assume the corresponding supplementary liability.<br> <br>According to this provision, which bears the main security obligations is the organizer of various public places or mass activities. In the present case, where Archie and A strong company is engaged in production and business activities of enterprises,http://www.jinmeidsf.com/news/html/?68453.html, companies with between Archie and A strong labor relations are established,air max 90 pas cher, it provides dormitory for employees not engaged in public places or mass site-specific activities, according to the law did not have the security obligations that the company does not assume the main security obligations.<br> <br>Moreover, the company is equipped with a security incident on duty that day, strongly compromised in Afghanistan after the company timely alarm calls, the implementation of rescue behavior,http://webshop.tafcue.com, have the greatest possible to avoid the harmful consequences of further expansion,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/idealtime/doomed.html,tn reuqin pas cher, for which strong in Afghanistan nor in personal injury It has a fault.<br> <br>(Original title: staff quarters fighting company was sentenced to death without pay)<br><br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.