<p> Baoding City to do the demolition is still not satisfied that the verdict violated the law, factual errors, improper verdict, appeal to the Court of Baoding. This time, the Baoding City Intermediate People's Court issued an administrative ruling, revoked the south downtown People's Court ruling, sent back South of the People's Court for retrial. In December 2004, the South of the court again ruled that the decision to do the demolition of Baoding indeed problematic: "Because Baoding road network does not have a functional headquarters award, and in determining the signature stamp, the Department of improper exercise acts of executive power, "and finds that the demolition of the ruling" compensation for Chen Xiaodong did not make. " Accordingly, the court made the ruling Nanshiqu with the first sentence identical. Baoding City to do the demolition once again, appeal to the Court of Baoding, Baoding City Intermediate People's Court in March 2005 ruling that: "the trial verdict facts are clear, applicable laws and regulations is correct, the appellant's grounds of appeal court does not support." Therefore, once again, "rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict." "They just go through the judicial process to drag me, tossing me." Chen Xiaodong said, after hearing so many times, every time he actively preparing for, responding seriously, but in the meantime, the demolition of Baoding do not appear in court to be repeated v.</p>
<p> "I bought the price, with the market price is almost.</p>
<p> "Sometimes the court hearing notice this day, we went to, the results to the court, did not even come to the city to do the demolition, said the judge had to postpone the hearing." Chen Xiaodong even more disappointing is that after the final judgment, to do the demolition of Baoding simply became a "walk away dispensers", how supervision, in accordance with the court's decision is not issued by the award. He sued the city government waited 10 years finally hearing Baoding government to initiate prosecution also has twists and turns,hogan online, originally did not expect to be able to initiate Chen Xiaodong. However, on the way home after his filing, he received a phone call to his staff handle the filing of Baoding in the hospital, so he hurried back.</p>
<p> and the "notice filing" and charge the bill back to the court costs, "say can not stand, give the money back to me." Chen Xiaodong certainly did not go back, but the case has been no hearing, to this year, is already the first 10 years. During this period, the even themselves consider themselves "too honest" man, suddenly found, became the object of local maintenance of stability, "Whenever there is an important meeting or a major holiday, I received a phone call or will be staring, not Let me go out petition. " How he did not add to the local government through chaos. Because of the long lead time than the trial, along with his lawyer to re-write this with an "administrative complaint" to the Baoding City Intermediate People's Court, "requesting an order the defendant to compensate the illegal demolition of its administrative acts caused to the plaintiff loss of 6 million yuan. " Baoding hospital when faced with a President "asking too much" of the question.</p>
<p> he said, "I told the President that this is just my demands it, you can discuss how you judge on how the sentence." July 19, China Youth Daily reporter in the hospital after contact with Baoding interview, Chen Xiaodong quickly called and said Baoding hospital just contact him, let him not look for reporters, agreed to mediation, the mediation fails then the hearing. 23, China Youth newspaper reports issued the same day, Baoding hospital finally hearing the case. Hope for 10 years, always wanted to stand in this case the plaintiff gallery Chen Xiaodong did not appear in court, "After all, people suing government officials, my heart is still a little worried," his two lawyers attended the hearing. The trial has been open from 9:00 to 14:00 more. Baoding City People's Government in the pleadings, said Chen Xiaodong demolished home dressing room belonging to municipal public building requires the demolition of houses, and in favor of urban renewal. "In view of this, by the respondent (Chen Xiaodong) should actively fulfill their obligations under the law.</p>
<p> do you own modest and should not interfere with the legitimate government of planning and construction work." Pleadings also said that in 2012, Chen Xiaodong, under the coordination of the city to do the demolition, signed the "relocation compensation agreement" to more substantial below-market prices, the placement of commercial dressing room of about 300 square meters, in addition, the two sides agreed 500,000 yuan resettlement compensation costs. "Chen Xiaodong was respondent wrote guarantee, after signing the relocation agreement, guaranteed friends, relatives, and friends no longer petition, appeal." Respondent requests Baoding Court dismissed Chen Xiaodong of. Chen Xiaodong admitted that he did, in coordination with the city to do the demolition, bought a commercial dressing room, but he denied that price "substantially less than the market price".</p>
相关的主题文章：
- http://www.tianyakeji.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
- http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=860/
- http://mapledeal.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=10681244&fromuid=77135
- http://bd.034000.gov.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=553520&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=271066
- http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
- http://gold.cfcassl.com/bbs/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=202453&uid=21618
- http://218.75.78.74:1108/zhsj/viewthread.php?tid=179240&extra=
- http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=620/