<br>After (Reporter Pei Xiaolan) Mr. Zhang picked up a diamond ring, claiming thought it was fake and throw it away, Wang said the results of the seeker diamond ring worth 4.6 million yuan, and the prosecution to the court. Reporters learned yesterday, the Second City Court found Mr. Zhang deliberately violated the legal obligation of safekeeping lost property, the final judgment of their compensation Wang 4.6 million yuan loss.<br> <br>Last July 9 morning,canada goose pas cher,http://www.xn--eck4dzdy45lfpwgk8azsw.net, Fengtai District, Ann Wang to market stop,http://xljhz.cn/news/html/?1662.html, get off accidentally diamond ring worth 4.6 million yuan loss. Wang found that immediately after the alarm,http://www.www68068.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=83372, police retrieved surveillance video of the site of the incident, Mr. Zhang and his girlfriend found Picking a diamond ring, and soon they found. Wang said at the time, Mr. Zhang acknowledged picked up the ring,air max 90,http://www.xljkzz.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=758700, but said they think the ring is fake,moncler outlet online, they readily throw away, and therefore refused to return. Wang then hold purchase invoices ring prosecution to the court to require Mr. Zhang 4.6 million yuan compensation for the loss of a diamond ring.<br> <br>The hearing, Mr. Zhang argues that he did that day picked up white ring, and hand over to his girlfriend, his girlfriend at first will ring on the bag, go to the bank for business After they looked at the ring, I thought it was fake, did not expect that someone else is lost, will readily throw. He said that if there was no throwing, he will return Wang.<br> <br>Late last year, Mr. Zhang Shunyi court verdict Wang compensation for the loss of 46,000 yuan diamond ring. Mr. Zhang refused to accept that Wang did not provide sufficient evidence to prove who has lost a diamond ring and a diamond on the facts,http://www.jjxqjs.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=3304,hogan outlet sito ufficiale,http://suzuki-afili-school.seesaa.net, even if Wang lost the ring can not prove that the missing ring and the ring he picked the same one, and it has no evidence that the ring value, he did not damage, loss ring intentional and should not be compensated.<br> <br>Second City Court held that, under the "Property Law", Lost Property,http://discuz.xuqiouwang.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=29833, shall be returned to the right holder. Keepers shall promptly notify the right holder to receive, or deliver public security departments. Prior to this, we shall keep the lost property finders, due to intentional misconduct or gross negligence resulting in lost property is damaged or lost, shall bear civil liability.<br> <br>Case, based on available evidence, can be identified Mr. Zhang Wang picked up the ring is worth 4.6 million yuan to buy a diamond ring. After Mr. Zhang picked up the ring, not the ring sent to public security departments, nor does it keep its claim to throw away the ring, so that the loss can not be returned to the ring, the violation of legal obligations safekeeping lost property,moncler outlet online, and has subjective intent,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000000940731.html, the civil liability of infringement of the economic losses caused by the response thus bear to Wang. Accordingly, the above verdict.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
did not expect that someone else is lost
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.