3gWqeJVDNp « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

3gWqeJVDNp

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by sdgbh4p1d

Tags:

sdgbh4p1d
Member

 □ intern reporter Han Jingwei Wang Star & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; careless father parked the car stalled after,W0zw6TWr22, did not pull the car keys, did not pull the handbrake to get off work, the 3-year-old lost half the children alone in the car. I did not expect a child trying to shift the car to start the car, just off inadvertently act in another driver hit by a car carrying the man live. After the issue of compensation can not be reconciled because the injured driver will be the children's parents and insurance companies taken to court. July 23, Zhengzhou Erqi court concluded the case, ordered the insurance company to take responsibility and compensate the victims of fees 2.27 million yuan. [Subject] 3-year-old baby and a half to start the car, the man hit Last May 8 afternoon, Zhengzhou public Liu dad with a 3-year-old son and a half by car errands, to step aside when he lines Longhai Road and industrious Street intersection north 100 meters west of the park go to work. Because impatient hurry, Liu will turn off after the car,1K3D4E3oS8, forgetting to unplug the car keys, he did not pull the handbrake,nike tn pas cher, but the child alone in the car play that he hurried to get off work. People did not expect is that 3-year-old baby and a half out of curiosity without actually starting the car, the vehicle moved south along. Unfortunately,hogan outlet online, just hit his car just down the work of Mr. Choi and the vehicle when the car moving. Mr. Choi did not expect to be hit by a 3-year-old driver and a half kids! Liu father arrived,LmqnrufQgG,doudoune moncler pas cher, Mr. Choi sent to hospital for treatment, the hospital diagnosis: Mr. Choi's injury left fibula head fracture, left tibia plateau fracture, left knee joint and soft tissue injury. The police found that Liu father bear full responsibility for the accident, Cui no responsibility. [litigation] Because compensation can not agree, appeals court After the event, Liu father whose son was in trouble, in addition to apologize to the victim, but also take the initiative to pay 18,137.87 yuan for medical expenses. But because Mr. Cui and Liu father was unable to reach an agreement because the issue of compensation, Cui Liu father and ordered the insurance company to court, requesting an order the defendant to compensate the plaintiff nursing care, hospital food subsidies, payments, lost income, fees totaling 35,138.60 yuan. Courtroom, the defendant Liu father argued that the plaintiff demands too high. Plaintiff seeks to recover 35,138.60 yuan no basis, because the vehicle has the insurance,, the insurance company should compensate the loss. For Liu has been advanced by 18,137.87 yuan, but also the insurance company for compensation. The defendant insurance company claimed that the case of tort liability man child, Liu father as legal guardian shall be liable. According to the relevant provisions of the Insurance Law, because the baby is not a legal driver,, the defendant shall be liable Liu father,louboutin soldes pas cher, the insurance company is not liable for damages. Even if the insurance company liable to pay compulsory insurance within the limit, but also reserves the right to recourse against the defendant Liu father. [judgment] Liu father bear full responsibility for the accident, the insurance company responsible for payment Erqi court hearing that infringes upon causing bodily harm, should compensation for medical expenses, care, treatment and transportation expenses for the reasonable costs of rehabilitation expenditures. Case involving investment vehicles have to pay high insurance and liability insurance, the insurance company should be compensated first by in cross-strong insurance liability limit. According to police departments responsible for the accident found that Liu father bear full responsibility for the accident, to go beyond cross-strong insurance and liability insurance compensation limit section, be compensated by the defendant Liu father. According to the plaintiff's injuries, treatment needs and the doctor's advice,3sBtCFRgy9, the loss of the plaintiff a total of 22,758.99 yuan, are within the insurance limits,, the insurance company for compensation by the defendant. The persons responsible for the accident insurance company argued that child, not a legal driver is not compensable. But the court that the case of traffic accidents are caused because Liu did not take good care of the vehicle, so the defendant insurance company argued that should not be supported. The defendant Liu father has advance medical expenses, you can claim the rights to the insurance company separately. Final court verdict: defendant insurance company to compensate the plaintiff for medical expenses totaling 22,758.99 yuan Cui. Parents please do not leave young children alone in the car Driving accident problem for children, the trial judge considered the case, the children does not have to drive a motor vehicle qualifications and ability,doudoune moncler soldes, if their guardians traffic safety consciousness, once the incident or accident, physical and psychological harm to the child and the whole family and harm to society are enormous. Therefore, to remind parents who have a vehicle Important: Car headlights flameout must pick block, after the flame pulled the handbrake to avoid the child alone in the car, leaving the cab must take the car keys unplugged and safekeeping,4rdEJw0NrC, to prevent Children just start the car. So as to avoid the occurrence of similar incidents. (Original title: careless father age children get off work three car accident) 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.