DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

speak incoherently. After repeated inquiries

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by bkadsgap7092

  1. <br>WASHINGTON IOU, fabricated out of 200,000 yuan of debt, so the plaintiff and the defendant Zhang Chen,moncler outlet, "hand in hand" to the cloud and court litigation in an attempt to borrow the judgment debt in the form of fixed fictional.<br> <br>Unexpectedly wisdom wrong, both acts were carefully judges eye to see through, two people have been sentenced to 15 days detention.<br> <br>Chen is a toy business owner,louboutin outlet, in January 2009, he was cash flow, however, borrowed 40,000 yuan to Mr. Hong. Thereafter,http://www.seozhanzhang.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=481802, poor business, losses, creditors have come to court,peuterey spaccio, Chen's workshop has also been sealed by the court,http://radio-gresivaudan.org/spip.php?article1435,hogan rebel,http://www.917wc.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=82424, about to enter the auction process.<br> <br>Mr. Hong is a disabled person, life is actually quite hard, this 40,000 yuan of money is his 10 years of savings. Thus,http://www.yfgw111.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=240451&extra=, in order to recover some losses,http://www.nudistgallerie.com, Mr. Hong to find Chen,http://www.777a.cc/plus/feedback.php?aid=1837, allowed a fictional 20 million promissory note to his brother Zhang, and let Zhang holding fake IOU to the court.<br> <br>Out of sympathy, the legal consciousness of Zhang, Chen, according to Mr. Hong's meant to do, and did not realize that their behavior has been illegal.<br> <br>In the course of hearing the case,moncler sito ufficiale,http://100mm.cc/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=598388, the judge at the time of Zhang income, money sources and delivery methods, such as survey and found that Zhang flustered, speak incoherently. After repeated inquiries, Zhang finally acknowledged their fictional IOU to the court of the facts.<br> <br>The court found that Zhang, Chen making a false lawsuit behavior has seriously hampered the normal order of the court hearing, but given the two mistaken attitude good, and no serious consequences, it is not criminally prosecuted two and make justice 15 days detention decision.<br> <br>The judge reminded: forged important evidence, obstruct people's court hearing the case, the court shall impose a fine based on the circumstances of detention; constitutes a crime,http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3522, be held criminally responsible.<br> <br>He Yueyan newspaper correspondent Zhong Genqing<br> <br>Our reporter Shengwei<br> (Edit: SN009)<br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.