Putuo District COSCO two Bay City. Weixuweishe<br>[Xinmin? Exclusive coverage Recently, a number of owners,doudoune moncler pas cher, who lives in Putuo District COSCO two Bay City to Xinmin reflect, property officer Zamen consecutive nights of violence, serious harassment of the daily life of residents. COSCO Property August 20 said that these practices because some owners of long-outstanding property charges, in fact,494GhloSRS,louboutin soldes femme, quite upset.<br> <br>Midnight Cry Dunning property charges<br> <br>COSCO two Bay City,eh3nFT8xOR, who lives three Chow told reporters recalled that, since five consecutive days from July 30, a group claiming to be staff of the property,eSJIkxWe5F, with Dunning property charges,dUMe6XuD0G,moncler pas cher,kC5z8v9GeW, citing midnight Bash the door of his house. "August 5 to go home,gXWD8PQmYt, see their own house to be demolished to throw the door in the corridor door, and how to open locks, door locks core has been discovered that the infusion of glue. But in hindsight, the property does not recognize glue seal lock behavior. "<br> <br>Owner Gary also told reporters that the Xinmin, August 5 at 1 pm, he and his family are in their sleep, suddenly was a hasty and violent Zamen doorbell woke to the sound. "We are very afraid, not knowing what was happening outside,piumini woolrich sito ufficiale, only to call 110. Police rushed to the scene after dare to go out, I saw the corridor and stood five or six Han, have to wear the uniform of the property, also has casual and the other said to Dunning arrears of property charges. "<br> <br>Exhaust pipe exhaust pipe and the ground floor of the hotel district residents, and together,32n3pS603Q,moncler Outlet, there is a serious fire safety hazards; unauthorized public area zoned Parking Rental; service standards are not standards. Owners told Xinmin reporter, residents had multi reaction on these issues, and even to the courts,epAIv0ykqO, but so far to no avail, but unfortunately we can only holdover property costs in the form of protest.<br> <br>Owners angrily said, "the property is by Dunning property charges on the grounds that the owners retaliation."<br> <br>Staff concerned has been criticized education<br> <br>COSCO Property Doo responsible person stressed that the reason why the time will come after the election in 22 points, because the majority of the owners are not at home during the day, according to the owners of the property schedule, adjust their working hours. He also said that indeed received a knock on the situation of violence and glue reflect blockade, but when no employees surveyed admitted. "The company has never been mentioned to staff so requested, may be employees because the property does not meet the prescribed fee collection rate index (result), but no matter what the facts, has been on the staff concerned were criticized."<br> <br>"We had also through court proceedings, but even so, just back to the front, back and owe on. We do not want because of repeated court will put the owners of the property opposite." According to Du, currently about 100 cells I households of long-term tenants in arrears of property charges, which have been outstanding the longest time over 20 months.<br> <br>"We understand that the owners want to protect their legitimate rights and interests, but some problems can not be solved unilaterally property, the grievances sent to the property company's head, only to refuse to pay property charges brought difficulties to our work, it also undermines the other contributions the interests of the owners. "Mr. Du Xinmin reporters, such as payment of a debt is not still seek a judicial solution.<br> <br>Lawyers point of view: property practice alleged willful infringement<br> <br>Adjustment of working hours and rest according to the owners? Shanghai big state law firm Zhangqian Lin lawyers believe that this interpretation is beyond the scope of the average person can understand, "midnight knock on the door," is entirely a malicious infringement. "Property can be informed by telephone, door posted article, put-mail reminders and other practices to recover property charges, even by judicial proceedings claim subject to late fees."<br> <br>But Zhangqian Lin also pointed out that perception of service quality often varies property owners can exercise their right to replace the property, but refused to pay property charges are not desirable. In addition, if the public interest and personal interests conflict with all the owners, the owners should perhaps be appropriate compromises. "Because of dissatisfaction with property services and other reasons refused to pay property charges, now universal. Whether or property owners, should distinguish between the right border, to avoid excessive rights." (Xinmin reporter intern Wei Xu Wei Chen Wenlin Li)<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
NhA44aeh1N
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.