<br>Nanfang Daily (Reporter / Rongming Chang correspondent / slightly Xu Jun) Fengshun Meizhou City, a pair of young men and women living together nearly eight years later because of emotional discord and break up,scrape hogan,http://www.realcity.jp, women (a pseudonym) sued to court for custody when the parties live together born child, saying the child was not his and cohabitant Afghan army (a pseudonym) born. On the court, the Arab army statement denied the red and raise their children themselves. When the two sides deadlocked, red raised their children to do paternity testing requests, since the Arab army flatly refused, the truth could not be identified. SACP's Court according to the law of the red request support, the Afghan army first instance verdict appeal. Recently, Meizhou City Intermediate People make rejected the appeal and upheld the final judgment.<br> <br>Cohabiting unmarried first sterile 6 years<br> <br>According to reports, the plaintiff and the defendant Argentine red recognize in early 2002 after cohabitation, the same year in December held a wedding ceremony in accordance with the customs of his hometown, but has not yet reached the Civil Affairs Bureau for marriage registration. The summer of 2008, red discovered she was pregnant, and gave birth to a boy in early 2009. While two people are immersed in the joy,http://www.seo-association.com, the couple was often due to old habits and fight. August 2010, the two had a heated altercation,http://kaschguitar.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=32985, the Afghan army beat red, so red left alone back to her parents live, the child is living life with the Afghan army.<br> <br>Surprisingly yes, by the end of December 2010, the red court asked the prosecution to raise a child born out of wedlock, and said in the complaint, the child and the defendant Afghan army no blood, she was the third person is born, so children should by her upbringing.<br> <br>A military insists the child is born with its red, there is child's birth certificate and booklet can be proved, therefore, on child custody issues, the two sides deadlocked.<br> <br>Refused to do to identify the man lost<br> <br>Red to prove his point of view,http://associationflainoise.fr/spip.php?article81/, put forward for the children to do DNA paternity testing requirements,hogan rebel, the Afghan army disagreed. In order to confirm the child's father, red also proposed a third party with kids to do paternity testing, the Afghan army does not agree. Since the Afghan army refused to identify, whether the Afghan army is not the child's biological father, it is difficult to identify through scientific means.<br> <br>Court of First Instance,http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi, the plaintiff and defendant both sides did not apply for marriage registration formalities as husband and wife cohabitation department violations. About illegitimate child custody issues, on both sides of the child who is the biological father of a dispute, the Afghan army by the defendant or a third person with kids and kids do a paternity test is absolutely necessary. A military think they are the child's biological father, have the responsibility to provide evidence to prove that, but he did not agree to do a paternity test, does not agree with the third man and child to do a paternity test.<br> <br>According to "Supreme People's Court several provisions of the civil evidence" second "party submitted their own claims on the basis of facts or rebut the other claims are based on the fact that there is a responsibility to provide evidence to prove it. There is no evidence or insufficient evidence proof of the fact that the parties argued,http://www.xn--uisr00ceul.com/news/html/?165435.html, the burden of proof borne by the party adverse consequences "requirement,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/topism/denim-38.html, the case in the defendant's responsibility to provide the Afghan army without providing evidence, should bear the adverse consequences of their own.<br> <br>Meanwhile, in view of the plaintiff to prosecute child under two years of age, it is conducive to the healthy growth of children by raising more appropriate red, so the decision to raise the child by the plaintiff. After the verdicts, the defendant refused to accept the Afghan army and appealed to Meizhou City Intermediate People's Court.<br> <br>Meizhou in the hospital after hearing that the plaintiff and defendant did not do marriage registration and cohabitation as husband and wife, cohabitation between the two sides without legal protection. For child custody issues when both cohabiting fertility, since the first trial to prosecute a child under two years of age, and to whom is the child's biological father of a dispute, the defendant does not agree Ajun do paternity testing, it is conducive to child health from the first trial the growth point of view,barbour pas cher, the child custody judgment by the plaintiff appropriate. Finally, the second instance to dismiss the appeal and upheld the final judgment.<br> <br>■ Law Links<br> <br>According to "Supreme People's Court on the confirmation of illegitimate paternity man refused to reply in paternity how to deal with," explained in the confirmation illegitimate cases, the burden of proof should be borne by the plaintiff,tn requin pas cher, the defendant (the man) If you deny the plaintiff to prove conclusion,http://66.154.116.54, should provide the appropriate evidence, if it can not prove that he is not the father of an illegitimate child,Veste barbour, the court deems necessary, may request a paternity test.<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN001)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
born. On the court
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.