"prop Yang June 24 « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

"prop Yang June 24

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by sdvjic2f2

Tags:

sdvjic2f2
Member

 Shanghai Baoshan Detention Center Not long ago, democracy and the rule of law society,nike tn, said the reporter received a tip lines: in June 2013, Shanghai Baoshan District detention centers, there was a man full of text green underpants,Guangdong college entrance exam arts explosion "take the test door, its content and "public relations", "commutation" relevant. Baoliao who also said that underwear is someone from outside and handed a suspect in custody, the recipient Mingjiao Ding Qiang (pseudonym). June 30, 2011, Ding was Shanghai Baoshan District People's Court (hereinafter referred to Baoshan District Court) sentenced to 18 years in prison. In December 19, 2013 This underwear after the Baoshan District Court judgment in the case again Ding Qiang, six years into a sentence. Meanwhile, the reporter also found that many Internet forums on domestic, but also filled with a lot of "behind the incident Baoshan District Detention Center underwear judicial corruption," the report note. This underwear behind, hidden in the end what? Underwear in the "code word" Reporters asked to remain anonymous persons in underwear picture to see, first trousers position reads: "I dream of two brothers targets 'Quintiles' scheme 1000 m3 2 units, all arranged, waiting for you, There are good things together to discuss, will be honored. " And "'Quintiles' program 1000 m3 2" accused is code word. Second trousers reads: "Brother, do everything according to our consultation, the road now in full swing, I come back to steel hit the phone several times, until 10 June (2013, reporters note) steel the material distributed I, I received the material begins to operate. " Further, the display on which underwear white belt: "prop Yang June 24 (2013, reporters note) letter I received, I assure you I have arranged, steel, the husband does not fit does not matter,"false leader" arrest., they do not give me a call,but also to see more implicat, I will take the initiative to fight them, I promise you things will do it. " "My goal is to come out early brothers, now take care of all take care of, and so you come out again thank the people, honor your commitment, you quickly see the sun, and hope to meet as soon as possible." Content on the belt also he said. When the March 19, 2015, reporter interview requests on the matter to the Baoshan District Detention Center, the other said: "No to the media respond only to their superiors unit to respond." In addition, the reporter learned from the Shanghai official, detained in the Baoshan District Detention Center Ding Qiang, formerly general manager of Jiangsu Taizhou Zhenchang Steel Co., Ltd. (Taizhou Zhenchang), April 28,hogan rebel, 2009 criminal detention, the same year on June 2 He was arrested. Taizhou Taizhou Zhenchang formerly Shanghai Yu company, began in 2006, Shanghai Zhenchang Metal Resources Group Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Zhenchang) successively inject 700 million yuan, the acquisition of Taizhou and Shanghai Yu equity firm, after the company changed its name to Taizhou Zhenchang former Shanghai Yu spawned strong corporate control has been appointed general manager of Taizhou Zhenchang. A person familiar with the case, said Ding Qiang reason was detained in 2009: "The reason is during his tenure, suspected of using the company's facilities management contract fraud, job occupation, misappropriation of funds and other criminal means against Shanghai Zhen Chang and Taizhou Zhenchang legitimate rights and interests. " Reporter in "(2010) Bao Criminal First No. 906," Baoshan District Court criminal verdict also see: the defendant guilty of contract fraud Ding Qiang sentenced to two years and fined five hundred thousand yuan; guilty of duties embezzlement, sentenced to eight years, decided to implement eighteen years imprisonment and fined five hundred thousand yuan. Dante strong and refused to accept this verdict, and soon to the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court (hereinafter referred to the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court or two in the hospital) appeal. Until 4 February 2013 after almost two years, the Shanghai Second Intermediate Court was issued to lack of evidence, the facts are unclear, citing the case back to Shanghai Baoshan District People's Court retrial, while revocation "( 2010) No. 906 Po Criminal First word "criminal verdict. Shortly thereafter, someone happened to custody in the detention center of the small strong hands to "Text underwear" thing, and the content is full of "dot" "Thanks," and other sensitive words from the outside world. Unexpected call recording It is worth mentioning that in the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court revoked Baoshan District court verdict, five well-known domestic criminal law expert prof, Zhang Mingkai, LiuMingXiang, Zhou right, Lin Wei on the case conducted a demonstration of collective behavior considered Ding Qiang indeed constitute a contract fraud, embezzlement and the like. To December 19, 2013, Baoshan District Court again on Ding strong case to make "(2013) re-word sentence treasure No. 1" criminal verdict shows that: the defendant guilty of embezzlement Ding Qiang, sentenced to six years. Prior to the "guilty of contract fraud" is removed. Democracy and the rule of law society reporter investigation that, just after "(2013) re-word sentence treasure No. 1" criminal judgments issued, Shanghai, Taizhou Zhenchang Zhenchang presence of the Minister of Finance Chen Moulan, who respect the results of the phone consultation Cases presiding judge Zhang Jun (a pseudonym). Reporters with Zhang in call recording obtained heard, Chen expressed doubts on this decision, but Zhang responded: "Our views are not the views of the verdict, can only say that is certainly not the views of Baoshan Court judgment opinion." Zhang also mentioned recording: "We are top of the live thing, all things can not control, do not say, my little judge, this case has a mix of too many other things." Zhang and admitted: "As part of our grassroots courts, it is also no way." The last call, Zhang told Chen Moulan: "We certainly nothing to Baoshan Court, had told so." Recently, the reporter saw Chen Moulan. According to Chen Jieshao, she had also served the judicial system, after retirement, was hired as chief financial officer Zhenchang Shanghai. confirmed to reporters the authenticity of the call: "I started recording Zhang did not think the tone, just like the case to ask the case, but he said, 'grassroots courts are above the nose of time' I think this case is tricky,according to the meeting The requirement to do, just let me apprentice brought the recorder. " Chenmou Lan said that this call recording after the Shanghai Zhenchang sent to the discipline inspection departments,after 110 alarm,scrape hogan, in 2014 the central second inspection teams during inspections in Shanghai, she also specialized tour group who were called to inquire about recording things. "Baoshan District Prosecutor's Office also know this recording." Chenmou Lan said. Another person aware of the case described: "Zhang because recording things, wrote several checks, was very passive." In addition, shortly after "(2013) re-word sentence treasure No. 1" verdict issued, Baoshan District Prosecutor's Office in relation to the judgment, the Shanghai Second Intermediate Court to lodge a protest. Democracy and the rule of law society reporter also got this "Shanghai Bao anti-seizure punishment [2014] No. 1" criminal protest in writing. Baoshan Procuratorate, said: "The Court finds that the facts and evidence in the case, Shanghai Baoshan District People's Court (2013), No. 1 treasure Criminal heavy word first instance criminal verdict against the defendant guilty of embezzlement Ding Qiang, sentenced sentence of six years, are facts wrong, resulting in the sentencing obviously wrong ...... the interests of justice and fairness, accuracy punish crime, in accordance with the provisions of Article 217 of the "People's Republic of China Criminal Procedure Law," the law to lodge a protest. " Who are concerned over the case, the original thought that the protest would turn for the better case, but in December 9, 2014, the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court issued a "(2014) Shanghai Second Criminal No. 81 final word" criminal ruling Book: "dismissed the protest, appeal and upheld the original verdict." Together with an indication "This is the final verdict." Multiple "mystery man" Democracy and the rule of law society reporter in the survey found, Ding Qiang's case also appeared in several "mystery man", the first is the aforementioned underwear information providers. "The underwear picture is someone with a flat letter sent to us, which is also attached to some other content, probably means that someone is manipulating the case." Shanghai Zhenchang chairman Cuimou Rong said, "still do not know who sent it." In addition to underwear data, but Cui Mourong claiming to have received another e-flat letter, although the postmark stamped on the envelope the letter to this level, but the writing has been blurred, "Shanghai Commission for Discipline Inspection investigated this letter, they check very fine . "Cuimou Rong said. And writing this letter,every time she very generousl, is also the "mystery man", inscribed self-proclaimed "Shanghai court system a judge." The letter said: "Ding Qiang, a cause of action Second City Court sent back to court for a retrial after Baoshan, Baoshan court under pressure." "Upheld it, not accountable to their superiors, commuted it, victimization units clash, thus Baoshan Court's internal disagreements great disagreement, hearing the case had dragged down." The letter said. In addition, the letter also revealed that Shanghai court system leadership "instruction Baoshan Court held a party committee to discuss, as a political task, which requires members to Ding Qiang case judgment unify thinking, party committee held in the morning, afternoon, immediately convene the CRIC consideration, participating members are well above the set a good tone, what advice can say. " This letter of authenticity may be, there is no more information sources confirmed. There is also a "mystery man" is "friends", in the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court "(2014) Shanghai Second Criminal final word No. 81," issued, there has been strong for the small number of well-known domestic grievances Internet forum Posts: "shocked Beijing Ding strong case his family after five years and six months of unremitting hard petition, eventually after a complaint to get redress." The net posts also directed: "Shanghai Baoshan judiciary (public security) joint law enforcement corruption, so this is a pile evolution of civil and economic disputes as complex, confusing, long delay to no avail,scrape hogan, shocked the criminal injustice of society." Unfortunately, Reporters through a variety of ways, also failed to find the actual person posting the net posts. In addition,It turned out after two youth, the net posts also accused of manipulating the judiciary is Zhenchang Shanghai Baoshan District. In response, the company chairman said: "On this matter, I can stand any investigation department and personnel, if there is no activity Ding family, panties events explain how I understand it, underpants above '1000 m3 2? Taiwan 'means' two 10 million'. " "There is one detail, the case for retrial shortly before we've even heard rumors of the small sentence only six years, if the procuratorate protest, plus two years on an appropriate, the decision really is six years later." Cuimou Rong said. Another unnamed Shanghai seized parties who responded: "In any case, the Second Intermediate Court and the judiciary in Baoshan District, certainly one has a problem, or else how could such a big difference, I believe, one day of truth . " It is worth mentioning that the "small case" after being commuted, Shanghai Zhenchang appealed his conviction to the Shanghai Procuratorate Second Branch of appeal, on March 17, the reporter learned from the hospital: "After review of the case has been accepted. " Who is manipulating? According to Shanghai Zhenchang chairman Cui Mourong say, he has experienced the process of Ding strong case, we found Shanghai court system have led intervention "small case" and repeatedly to the discipline inspection departments real name. But in the May 20, 2013, Cui Mourong has suffered a Shanghai High Court discipline inspection group of people interviewed, interviewed him, a former Shanghai Higher People's Court, deputy head of the discipline inspection group Ni Jung. Ni is a member of occurred in August 2013, "Shanghai High Court Judge collective prostitution" incident. "He would not let me talk too much, he does not listen to what I say, then he wrote a record of inquiry, asked me to sign." Cuimou Rong told reporters, "It was obviously feel Ni Jung struggling to shield this case." Cui did not expect to make a few months later, Ni Jung fell into prostitution scandal, after being expelled from the party, dismissed from their posts,hogan rebel, expelled from office. The front office Ni to the Shanghai High Court, in two people in the hospital any branch deputy secretary of the Second Chamber. In addition, Cui Mourong been reported to the discipline inspection departments, as well as Shanghai court system a D leadership. According , after "small case" the first trial results down, he heard someone in the active case, the person concerned after the match, he and the former Shanghai High Court D leaders met a face during the dinner. "My purpose is to hope that the High Court concerned only concerned with this case, the requirements of a fair law enforcement, other do not want nothing." said, "during the dinner, D leadership after read my material, immediately said that such Criminals do not blow, there justice? " Subsequently, this meal Cuimou Rong spent more than 13,000 yuan. In addition, there are D leadership to participate in the dinner his wife and others. Cui told reporters, D leadership repeatedly accepting his gifts, the total value of over 10 million. After the Spring Festival in 2012, shortly after the court who told Cuimou Rong, D Ding strong leadership actually work. Since then, began reporting D leadership, "he finally made a deal within the Court." In fact, the reporter found that in September 2012,if you do, the leaders also dismissed. But there are also claims that "D led to the retirement age." Reporters want to "small case" interview Ni Jung and D leadership, but the two are not currently work Shanghai Higher People's Court, and the contact is unknown, it is unable to complete the interview. In addition, the reporter through various efforts, did not find Ding Qiang family contact. But the reporter contacted Ding strong defense on Hass surname meaning legal firm lawyer, the other party to the "inconvenient to talk about the criminal case on the phone," he refused the interview. According to the accountants involved in auditing case Ding Qiang said, the case when they audit did find Ding suspected contract fraud, the Baoshan District Court of First Instance Shihai subject to the audit report, but the two in the hospital is not recognized . "We have no problem with the audit, based on all financial documents and other evidence." Wumou Xia said. Reporters learned that the Shanghai center Wu Mouxia where forensic accounting, audit institutions specializing in the administration of justice, relations with Ding Qiang and Shanghai Zhenchang no. Wumou Xia told reporters, audit their "small case" conducted Baoshan Public Security Bureau to hire, "but the audit report, and finally into a piece of paper." This move has made her puzzled. Source: Democracy and Legal Times & Nbsp; 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.