DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

a middle-aged man on the photo is very annoying

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by bg8tS5sA5S

  1. bg8tS5sA5S
    Member

    The thief's photo posted in the cell gate. Residential security posted video shots.<br>Nanjing Jianye District Ashanti Elysees district thieves frequently have lost the multiple sets of electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles. Community security through video surveillance within the district to determine several theft is the same as for the men. To remind area residents to strengthen prevention, with the catch name of habitual theft, residential security thief put photos posted on the cell gate publicity. This practice area residents generally agreed, but was considered a violation of civil rights thief. Yangzi Evening News reporter then interviewed on the matter of the two lawyers, two lawyers agree that this practice is not improper, in the case of video evidence,scrape hogan, not fabricated facts, nor man stealing defamation insult, just a small area within the jurisdiction of autonomy a self behavior, would not constitute infringement. The purpose is to protect the security community to do community residents and property safety, while allowing residents to provide valuable clues, good catch thieves soon as possible. & Nbsp; & nbsp;<br> <br>Yangzi Evening News reporter Cao Luger<br> <br>Car thieves repeatedly transvestites,http://bbs.tt919.com/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/post.php?fid=108?fid=108,moncler outlet, security stickers photo hunt clues<br> <br>Yesterday morning, after the Yangtze Evening News reporter received a public rebellion, arrived Ashanti Elysees district west gate, she saw posted on the door of a piece of A4 paper copy photos. Photo, a middle-aged man riding an electric car out of the cell door. In the bottom of the image, there is a line handwriting, reads: "This man electric car theft recidivist,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/idealtime/bcnwlt.html, please be vigilant, if we find this person as soon as possible and call 110 security personnel or direct contact." Residential security that their photos are posted, the main purpose is to catch the thief stole the electric car as soon as possible.<br> <br>Residential security to reporters, a middle-aged man on the photo is very annoying, in the district have been stolen several times. During the National Day holiday, one of the owners prepared to work out, and found that the electric car was gone,http://2500.my0514.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=165587, to find residential security to help find, in the entire district could not find a few laps to find the electric car. At this time, we realized that the electric car is stolen, and immediately play back the last few days of surveillance video and found a middle-aged man walking secretly sneak into quarters, then stole the electric car. We also saw the previous video and found that middle-aged man recently stole the personal appearance cell electric car battery, "he fairly sophisticated, each entry into the cell is not the same dress, and even installed over the lame, sneaking into the cell. "<br> <br>Residential security also introduced after the incident, the first time they reported the matter to the public security organs, public security organs but sometimes can not break the case, even if not necessarily solve the case of the stolen recovered back to electric cars and that several groups of electric car battery. So in order to improve security awareness area residents, but also to catch the thief soon, residential security only in the cell door the thief posted photos. Photos posted a video shot entirely printed out, the screen man electric car ride away is residential property owners lost the car, posting photos mainly to district residents to see, so do entirely for the protection of community property safety of residents, but also In order to find more clues about the thief, well assist the public security organs to solve the case as soon as possible.<br> <br>Post pictures catch the thief, thief structure does not constitute "infringement"<br> <br>Photos posted after the thief, often residents gathered around together in the cell door,piumini woolrich outlet, pointing toward the photo. Reporters interviewed more than 10 area residents, the majority of residents agreed with the thief posted photos, the deterrent effect of a certain good thief. Some residents expressed hateful thief, after the alarm had not been caught, they should face photograph released to facilitate thief and attention. Some of the residents believe that the thief should be arrested, but as a non-public security organs district security personnel,http://www.adinm.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, unauthorized posting photos of suspects suspected infringement.<br> <br>Residents very fact that the thief photos are posted October 4, although not catch him, but then they see the residents at least, vigilance would be increased, for strangers to enter the community will pay attention to it and see is not that The thief again! And since the thief photo stickers, also played a certain deterrent effect, the cell for several days did not happen theft case. This is often used to steal the man photographs published good, both for the convenience we know the thief, but also to prevent thieves start, once residents saw the man and then to steal the district, but also timely warning to let the police arrest people.<br> <br>Residents say many residents of Wong holding different views, he said, public thief photos inappropriate, standing residents theft point of view, he agreed to this district security practice, but standing legal point of view, he opposed, because Photos posted thief apparently violated the right of portrait thief.<br> <br>Lawyers say<br> <br>Post was not inappropriate in the autonomous area<br> <br>Residential security in the cell door properly posted inappropriate pictures of the thief, thief would constitute infringement? Reporters interviewed on the matter, Jiangsu Hua law firm of Lang Rao Fenbin lawyer, Jiangsu Cui Cui Wu martial law firm lawyers. The two lawyers said, to the fact that as a basis, and the thief posted photos in the autonomous area,http://www.cysa.cc/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=166802, belong to the self-service behavior of district management side, posting photos Fangzei thief thief is not inappropriate, to steal the man does not constitute infringement.<br> <br>Evidence - does not constitute libel framed<br> <br>The two lawyers said that China's current Constitution stipulates:. ". Personal dignity of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable prohibition against citizens by any means is an insult, slander and false accusation" visible human dignity is a fundamental constitutional rights, and human dignity specifically includes the reputation, name, portrait rights, privacy and other content. Residential security posted in the area of cell autonomy steal man's photos, and video as a factual basis, did not fabricate facts,http://www.jspe.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=6020404&fromuid=203146, nor to steal men were falsely accused of defamation, but did not disclose the identity of the man steal information,piumini woolrich, not for man's personal dignity presence violated one said.<br> <br>Not for profit - not <br> <br>Posting photos simply because the public security organs have not yet solve the case,http://genealogyregister.com, a self-service behavior in the area of autonomy. The purpose of this is mainly a warning to area residents in a particular area, raise awareness of district residents, but also to protect the safety of the residents within the district property, assist the public security organs to solve the case as soon as possible.<br> <br>Residents believe that the right of portrait thief affected, portrait rights are clearly defined, that is, without his consent shall be for commercial purposes citizen portrait. requirements "for profit" and cell photos posted thief thief is completely out Fangzei, not based on "commercial purposes" should not be classified as a violation of the right of the portrait.<br> <br>Community Post - not a "wanted"<br> <br>The two lawyers also said that under the relevant provisions of the "Criminal Procedure", should be arrested the suspect, if at large, the public security authorities may issue an arrest warrant. Noting that the thief photo area in the district autonomy is not the same as "wanted",woolrich outlet, but to guard against thieves steal re-enter the cell. But there is no conclusive evidence that the man is stealing himself on the photo, and photos of people without a court ruling that he was guilty, would conclude that he was a thief made public,http://www.cclchinese.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-8601, it would be against the alleged defamation, it is an offense.<br><br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.