at the following five days detention. « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

at the following five days detention.

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by gdflkoiv9k6

Tags:

gdflkoiv9k6
Member

 Not fly off the phone and do not listen to discourage, Beijing Nanyuan Airport Public Security Bureau to make administrative detention punishment decision Fan 3 May, Mr. Fan refused to accept the decision, the Beijing Nanyuan Airport Public Security Bureau to court to require revocation of administrative penalties decision. This morning, the case in Fengtai court trial. The plaintiff said that some parties do not police Jing Guanzheng, there are serious violations of the law. The defendant said that numerous witnesses prove that the plaintiff was not dissuaded not turn off the phone. No shutdown man on trial detainees reported police aircraft 59-year-old Fan, deputy director of a legal services center. Morning he appear in person. Fan said that at 21:20 on January 6, 2015 Xu, he was riding Hohhot Beijing Nanyuan flights, the aircraft still, he left side of the seat a man claiming to be security officer asked him to turn off the phone. He had had a drink,http://onigdesign.com/error.html, then had an argument with the man. After the man called flight attendants,http://old.sis-statistica.org/magazine/spip.php?article163,moncler sito ufficiale, he had an argument with a flight attendant, and then he would phone to flight attendants, flight attendants will phone off. After the plane landed, Mr. Fan to the police station for questioning survey, Beijing Nanyuan Airport Public Security Bureau in its takeoff taxiing off the phone and do not listen to discourage refused on the grounds of their administrative detention for three days to make a decision on punishment. Fan said that he and the flight attendants dispute, the aircraft is not in the taxi stage. Later,Veste barbour,http://www.provalterbi.ch/spip/spip.php?article15, he would phone to flight attendants, flight attendants are not not listen to discourage. "It was a dispute because a man claiming to be security officers failed to produce proof of identity." The defendant said the plaintiff in the taxiing phase illegal, "At that time the aircraft has been in the taxi phase,http://www.shakyo-sendaiaoba.com, have been played off the phone prompts content passengers, flight attendants and security staff and other witness testimony to prove. We give administrative punishment plaintiff is correct, there is no illegal. " Heated debate whether the police certificate can no enforcement? In court, the defendant issued the administrative penalty decision, the testimony of witnesses and other 40 groups of evidence that there is no proper punishment illegal. Fan this is not recognized, he said the police, Lee, Liu and three people did not get the people's police permit, according to regulations can not enforce the law, "three police make record of inquiry that is not valid, should be excluded." The defendant argued,http://xia.mods.jp/cgi-bin/ph/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=784/, it has provided evidence that the police did not get three people police certificate reasons, but does not affect its enforcement actions,hogan rebel, procedures and other aspects of the law does not exist. The aircraft is stationary or taxiing? The plaintiffs believe that the aircraft was at a standstill, although I have to take off, but the plane has not been fixed, so he did not turn off the phone. The defendant is not recognized, it represents more than demonstrate the aircraft had begun taxiing, and on television reminded to turn off the phone. Can transcripts as evidence when drunk? The defendant presented plaintiff Notes Show: Plaintiff admit that dispute, and did not shut the phone, saying very sorry for his actions. The plaintiff objected "to the police station when I was in a drunken state, police do alcohol testing seems to value is more than 100, indicating that I was in a drunken state. According to regulations, when a drunken state should make notes invalid." "If the plaintiff in a drunken state, the record is invalid, then his own description of the scene on the plane also is not true?" The defendant countered. The defendant issued more than the testimony of witnesses proved that the plaintiff was not closed because of people such as mobile phones and flight attendants dispute, the phone is forced to close the flight attendants. Related Links "Security Administration Punishment Law" stipulates that the use of the navigation system may affect the normal function of the appliances and tools on board an aircraft, dissuasion, at the following five days detention. "Civil aviation standards regulations" provisions,tiffany milano,http://diendan.tinmoitruong.vn/entry.php?b=270898, illegal use of computers and mobile phones and other portable electronic devices in an aircraft may be fined 2,000 yuan. "China Civil Aviation Administration of Public Security Decree 174" provides for violation of the provisions to use the remote control electronic devices such as mobile phones,http://www.thiefmissions.com,moncler outlet online, discouraged by the crew members, warning,http://zzw.tuizx.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=570, do not change who still insist on its equipment to be seized temporarily stored. Not be uniform in stopping the listener, the transfer of airport public security process, and give administrative detention punishment; cause flight delays, according to the law requires that the perpetrator for damages. 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.