<br>Southern News reporter Wu Wei Lu Siying Guangjun correspondent Marco Italian network message need to be cautious! Huidong Two women published in the microblogging inappropriate remarks,louboutin homme, evaluate a local wedding photo studio, he was sentenced against defamation establishment of enterprises, need to compensate 21,000 yuan court. According to informed the Court,http://web.wjdl.cn/news/html/?29805.html, the case plaintiff Jeong is a wedding photo studio owner,http://usr.cc/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Huidong County, Huang port. The defendant is a local woman Shen, his friend and because forwarding comments as defendants.<br> <br>Wedding photographs of studio discontent Internet tucao<br> <br>Cases the cause is March 21, 2013, the defendant Shen Ping to Huidong County, Huang port to buy a wedding photo studio wedding photography package,moncler outlet,http://0511mk.cn/read.php?tid=179697&ds=1, and ultimately buy a "happy wedding dress" package, and a one-time payment of 11,888 yuan. After the shooting, Shen Ping expressed dissatisfaction to the studio,http://cand.qee.jp/link_p/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target/;/, the same year on September 25 through the phone's remarks detrimental to the studio in Weibo, the defendant Kwak (Shen Ping friend) reproduced the remarks by mobile phone, and speech.<br> <br>Studio guests prosecution against defamation<br> <br>October 21 the same year, after the plaintiff Jeong found two defendants damage to its reputation by studio sued Huidong court. During the case hearing, the two sides reached in the same year on December 19, "reconciliation agreement", agreed to four points: two defendants in two days from the date of signing of the agreement inherent Weibo issued a statement to clarify the facts, eliminate the effects and an apology; two The defendant from the date of agreement within four days of one-time compensation for economic loss the plaintiff 21,000 yuan; defendant the plaintiff in the court within three days after the obligation to withdraw charges; if the defendant did not fulfill the agreement then pay another fine of $ 30,000, if the plaintiff is voluntary breach pay a fine of 50,000 yuan. Fine the defaulting party shall be delivered to the other party before December 28 of the same year. After the agreement is signed,http://mizu-masa.sakura.ne.jp/yokkaichi/movie/sunbbs2/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=2028&page=%22%22;, the two defendants fulfilled in Sina microblogging issued a statement to clarify the facts, eliminate the effects and obligations of apology, the plaintiff Jeong then withdraw the prosecution.<br> <br>The settlement agreement is not executed studio sued again<br> <br>But the two defendants failed to fulfill obligations in accordance with the agreement compensation 21,000 yuan, the plaintiff sued again, the request immediately order the defendants to pay compensation payments and $ 21,000 each to pay a fine of 15,http://ohh.sisos.co.jp/cgi-bin/openhh/search.cgi,000 yuan, a total of 51,000 yuan.<br> <br>From this verdict network infringement, Huidong the court held that the plaintiff requested the defendant Shen Ping, the defendant Kwak each pay a fine of 15,000 yuan, more than the two sides agreed to a 30% loss of 21,000 yuan, the plaintiff petitioned this extremely high , violation of the law,moncler pas cher, not support. According to "reconciliation agreement" signed by both parties and the principle of fairness, the two sides agreed liquidated damages according to 6000 yuan count, then the judgment from the date of the legal validity of the two defendants to 10 days of a one-time occurrence judgment jointly and severally to compensate the plaintiff 21,000 yuan,http://forum.longquanzs.org/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=259&mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,woolrich sito ufficiale, respectively, to the plaintiff 3000 yuan to pay liquidated damages and the burden of litigation costs 915 yuan,louboutin donna, dismissed the plaintiff's other claims Jeong.<br> <br>& Nbsp,http://www.postyournipples.com;<br> <br>Edit: SN146<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
Studio guests prosecution against defamation
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.