<br>Chongqing BEIJING, April 21 (by Cui Wei Xian) Buy others illegal self-built housing, had not the user how to do? Chongqing City, three in court on the 21st to the media that concluded together with its contract dispute,hogan outlet, for example,qOCTxN2VRw, the court found that because the Department of Housing Litigation illegal self-built housing, so the two sides signed a housing contract for the sale invalid, the verdict returned by the seller paying back 120,9q27kIcX5v,000 yuan and pay interest on funds used.<br> <br>March 22,tn reuqin pas cher,4F6Nf3p7xu, 2013, Liu and Li Shi Funv (they were all a pseudonym), the two signed a "house sale and purchase agreement", agreed: Li Shi Funv voluntarily Nanchuan located upstairs from a district in Building 1, 2003 a set of top-level houses built 120,000 yuan sold to Liu; Li Shi Funv must be water,oWyM5A5e9Y, electricity and fiber optic single transfer in the name of Liu, Liu's expense.<br> <br>After half a month, Liu Li paid the purchase money to the parent 120,000. But because the house did not apply for housing ownership certificates and approved the construction procedures, so water and electricity home housing problem has not been resolved, Liu could not live a normal result.<br> <br>Liu and Li Shi Funv after several unsuccessful negotiations, the prosecution request to the court judgment confirmed the two sides signed the "housing sale and purchase agreement" is invalid and demanded the return of his daughter Liu 120,000 yuan mortgage interest and capital occupation.<br> <br>When the first instance,L1Y461jUKn, Li Shi Funv argued in court: When "housing sale and purchase agreement" signed, Liu Guangming ownership certificate house is not known even to buy,okdk0p71f1, so you can not claim the contract is invalid.<br> <br>The Court of First Instance that,hogan outlet online, since the two sides were to present complaints fight housing ownership certificates, and father Lee also admitted that his self-built housing department, fails to "Town and Country Planning Act," the provisions of Article 40 to apply for construction project planning permit, in violation of mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, according to the "Contract Law" Article 52 shall be invalid contract.<br> <br>Court decision, since the two sides signed the contract void ab initio,2qL65yIdzf, therefore Liu Li Shi Funv shall return the funds to buy a house and occupied 120,000 interest.<br> <br>Li Shi Funv first instance verdict, appeal said,P8lU55vHnP, according to the Supreme Court "on the trial contract dispute case law applicable to the issue of" the provisions of Article III, the party to the seller of the subject matter by no ownership and disposition advocates contract null and void, the court not support it.<br> <br>Chongqing City, the court upheld the view that,piumini woolrich sito ufficiale, the Supreme Court "on the trial contract dispute case law applicable to the issue of" the provisions of Article III, are not entitled to dispose of the legal interpretation of the issue,moncler Outlet, and its premise is that the subject matter is a national allowing free circulation of goods. The case has violated the provisions of the Housing v dispute "Town and Country Planning Act," and not as a contract for the sale of the subject matter, so the case can not apply. First Instance found the facts are clear, the applicable law is correct, it is the judgment rejected the appeal and upheld the conviction.<br> <br>(Original title: illegal self-built housing had not returned to the court household mortgage and interest)<br> <br>Edit: SN117<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
Q5Vdaw3Hvt
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.