most of them already back home." « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

most of them already back home."

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by sdvshj6a

Tags:

sdvshj6a
Member

 July 9, Zhang Ailing 12-year-old son with a train back home - Datong, Shanxi Tianzhen County. This is the life of her family of three in Beijing ten years, the first separation. Earlier, after months of efforts, Beijing opened to public high schools failed to door,http://forum.wp-persian.com/profile/338847, Eileen Chang had to give up work in Beijing, he returned to his home town to rent, to become a full-time read along with her mother, while her husband continued to operate a steam in Beijing repair plant. Before this summer, Zhang Ailing child reading the sixth grade at a private school in Beijing's Chaoyang District Cuigezhuang. Divided by the school district, had children after graduating from secondary school should enter the breast room. Beijing this year, "Young liter small" "small rise early" to define the new rules of enrollment management, part of the county also proposed new requirements to pay social security, Zhang Ailing before junior high school enrollment in their hometowns Trustee go through formalities, but because of non-payment social security, and ultimately failed to get breast room school Jie Du card. Her experience is not the case, Zhang said, "The children in a class of 54 students, most of them already back home." Since the beginning of May, in Tongzhou,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/red-one/ik-0010.html, Chaoyang, Haidian District,http://237.newfine.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Beijing Ji non-parents for their children to go to school and have been everywhere. May 19, nearly 200 parents of non-nationals in Beijing Tongzhou District of Beijing Municipal Government and to the appeals office, called for the harmonization arrange child in elementary school. June 16 to Cuigezhuang and Shibalidian Township, Chaoyang District, more than 120 mainly non-Beijing Ji District Board of Education for school parents go right, during the clashes. June 18, Haidian District,woolrich sito ufficiale, Evergreen Township,http://marandy.foyer.be/spip.php?article235, more than 60 non-Beijing Ji parents dissatisfied with children are assigned to private schools nearby - still Renaissance Beijing Foreign Language School, collective petition to the Haidian District Board of Education. June 21, Zhang Ailing and more than 300 non-Beijing Ji parents take their children to the petition office in Beijing in front of the government and the petitioners. Ranks the forefront of children holding a "children go to school," a small card, and adults slogan shouting together, some of the mothers could not help but burst into tears on the spot. In the afternoon, a Beijing Municipal Education Commission official in the city of Letters and Visits Office met with 18 representatives of parents,air max 90 pas cher, who were from Chaoyang District,scarpe hogan outlet, 18 villages and towns. But the night, Cuigezhuang parents' representatives and representatives of other towns but have been warned concerned. And non-Beijing Ji "Young liter small" encounter similar difficulties, there are some like "small rise early," Zhang Ailing such non-Beijing Ji parents, their children had enrolled in not having paid enrollment eligibility private primary schools, while in junior high school, No need to go through the school and submitted for review material. Just a month ago, because the problem can not apply for household registration in Beijing nine junior high school students and their parents to Beijing Education Examination Yuan court. June 12, the case in the Haidian District Court, July 11, the case was the first instance verdict against the parents. Five Tongzhou District, "Young liter small" non-Beijing Ji parents, also on July 7 to Tongzhou district court filed a suit, prosecution and Tongzhou District, Beijing Municipal Education Commission. Parents were told to go to July 16, will know whether the lawsuit was accepted. In addition, the Township of Chaoyang District Cui, Shibalidian Township "Young liter small" non-Beijing Ji parents brewing prosecution. On the surface, opaque and wavering policy decision-making process, leading to Beijing this summer, "Battle of the right to education," the outbreak. However, in-depth analysis can be found, existing educational resources investment and management mechanisms to flow, as well as tough foreign ideas of population control, it is the result of the underlying causes of conflicts. Admission threshold increased April 18, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission issued a document relating to compulsory school attendance in 2014, requiring Beijing to accept non-nationals in Beijing compulsory school-age children, and their parents are required to provide "Five Card", ie proof of employment at the Beijing Workers living real residence in Beijing proof, the family booklet, a temporary residence permit in Beijing, and no guard condition to prove residence. In fact, Beijing the introduction of the documents is not new. Since 2012, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission already proposed for non-Beijing students to review the membership "Five Card" requirements. But in this year's document, Beijing Municipal Education Commission specifically authorized the county "with the actual details of implementation." Thereafter, the plurality of regions have announced strict "Five Card" provisions. For example, Dongcheng District requires both parents and workers living in the area; Fengtai District requires at least one parent workers in the area; Haidian District requires both parents of a temporary residence permit shall be March 1, 2014 in the area to handle; the Changping District It requires both parents held before December 31, 2013 issued temporary residence permits, and can not be interrupted. In addition, there are some added proof of social security conditions for approval in the "Five Card" basis. Such as Tongzhou District requires both parents between January 2013 to March 2014 in the region paid 12 months of social security; Chaoyang District also requires that both parents have to pay social security in this area, this one has become the area of non-nationals in Beijing Children can not be the main reason for the audit was adopted. "2014 May and June, for all school-age children of non-nationals in Beijing the parents concerned, is a black, humiliation, anger season." Chaoyang District Cuigezhuang of some non-Beijing Ji parents in a "road On where "the petition materials described. After more than a month without any feedback after a long wait, June 13, Chaoyang District Cuigezhuang government responded that only 25 people enrolled under review by the material, and another 13 people were sent to a secondary review. This township has submitted "Young liter small" material 500 nationals of non-Beijing students, it is inadequate. When the parents questioned, Chaoyang District, Beijing Municipal Education Commission answer the parents of non-nationals in Beijing on May 26 said: "The details of implementation are to undergo a county district government consent, City Board of Education can not interfere because of basic education in the county. City Board of Education does not directly pipe any one school. In this compulsory school attendance, district and county governments bear the primary responsibility is that we are operational guidance department. " Make parents more confused and difficult to accept, is rocking and fuzzy admission policies. Chaoyang District Cuigezhuang on May 5, "Young liter small" when enrollment began,louboutin pas cher, did not mention the condition relating to social security audits. A few days later when the parents went to submit "Five Card", only that "both parents must have social security,http://head.as.wakwak.ne.jp," this requirement, and the "social security must be paid in this area" is only heard after. After May 9, Chaoyang District Board of Education received reflect the situation of parents, afternoon Cuigezhuang government said it would relax the conditions for approval. "But on June 13, the township government was told we could pay half a year in the area before May 25, why do not you tell us a little earlier it?" One of the parents in the offing. Thereafter,Doudoune Parajumpers, on May 26th, the 27th, the township government announced 69 people in two batches approval list. When these parents to receive Jie Du certificate,http://www.hongyijdq.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=14066, dramatic scene took place: on the 27th this morning to parents received a certificate Jie Du afternoon to the parents were told "to stop issuing permits Jie Du." A parent surnamed Fu empty-handed, "the township government told me that record wrong." A parent Shibalidian Township complained: "policy that they please, no social security card Jie Du also made before May 23, June 17 and from the village and the school issued a number." June 21, 18 parent representatives in Chaoyang District Board of Education officials met with the petition to do, ask: "Why the first, second, third review by school material and now demands a policy is not the same Why? month and three transformers, without prior notice and public? "" Officials responded that this is the policy, he can not answer, they finish at. "A Question of parents relayed the scene. In the meeting,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, the parents receive from the Board of Education officials there a less precise information, a list of the last batch of the audit will be announced by July 10, with the proviso that both parents can provide proof of six months of paid into Social Security. But until July 10 when, the parents interviewed did not see this list. With parents increasingly strong voice questioning, May 29th Beijing Municipal Education Commission has issued a statement, stressing the non-Beijing Ji Children "Five Card" incomplete will not be enrolled in Beijing. The statement also said, according to the Ministry of Education without school liquidity management requirements of students in substandard schools, the school can not be established; not attending school back to the domicile,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, residence to the school must receive the law and the establishment of school. In other words, the government has the responsibility to receive residence for students attending their hometowns and solve school problems. While the policies were accused of publicity is not timely, some of the counties of temporary residence permits and social security demands are unreasonable, and if you do not meet the requirements if there is content remedial measures, the statement did not relate. Previous 12 Next 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.