So send money Legal Daily<br>Recharge can be repeated a hundred prepaid card, let Chen should, Rao Jin-tao couple suffered a "pie in the sky", but also they both brought to court. Public concern in the case, the legal profession has been called Kunming pirated "Xu Ting" case. Court of First Instance sentenced the couple to 13 years imprisonment, they refused to accept the appeal, the Kunming Intermediate Court finally ruled that "cassation, remand." Panlong Court re-trial, verdict yesterday: Chen should Couple guilty of theft, both jailed for 10 years. Whether Chen should couple will appeal again, it is unclear.<br> <br>Event Playback<br> <br>January 2007 to March, Chen should, Rao Jin Kim Jin Tao in Panlong District Office of the streets three lucky bamboo village for its business communications shop,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/1pia/papi-paha-ah307-02.html, take advantage of China Telecom Corporation Limited Yunnan Branch intelligent public phone system upgrade recharge platform error of the machine, repeatedly recharge illegal public telephone,woolrich outlet italia, and using the same modus operandi, fraudulent use of the name of China Telecom, lied at discounted price for the public telephone operators to provide prepaid recharge service, distributed around the card by Chen should solicit business outside, responsible for money, Rao Jin-tao responsible recharge, prepaid card if they hold it for the telecommunications public telephone recharge illegal,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/billy-k/groovya1a1.html, illicit money totaling 447,750 yuan recharge.<br> <br>February 4,http://www.haircare-style.jp, 2008, Chen couples should be prosecuted on suspicion of theft. In the same year on April 3, Panlong court verdict that found the couple in the telecommunications recharge cards can be repeated after a public telephone recharge, to seek benefits, the use of public telephone omissions Telecom recharge system, the repeated use of the telecommunications recharge cards illegal public telephone recharge, constituted theft, a huge amount, the two were sentenced to 13 years imprisonment, a fine of around $ 50,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000000764431.html,000, and ordered restitution of stolen money 414,700 yuan, the confiscation of their tools of crime.<br> <br>Key cases<br> <br>Theft or unjust enrichment<br> <br>From the time of filing, the case on the dispute continued. Whether it is theft or unjust enrichment, or other legal relationship? On the court, both couples Chen should shout "injustice", said the card is legally purchased, and is completely in accordance with the standard operation, every aspect of the telecommunications sector computer systems have been confirmed, one can expect the money prepaid phone cards after no less than on the account. Their defense lawyers insist, this is a bona fide first malicious unjust enrichment, a civil legal relationship.<br> <br>How much recharge amount<br> <br>From the first hearing of the case, Chen insisted that he should couple it to others charge calls, received only 30,000 yuan in cash. When the retrial, again argued that Chen should telecom prepaid card is bought, not a forgery, recharge amount just over 30,000 yuan, its conduct did not constitute a crime. He believes that more than 40 million in the case of alleged non-existent. How much money? To obtain an accurate proof, March 31, 2009, it commissioned the Yunnan Panlong Procuratorate impartial judicial identification center, 2007 Chen should use the telephone recharge cards couple thousand public telephones repeatedly recharge amount of illegal conduct forensic accounting test. After logging disc for all recharge censorship Kunming telecommunications intelligent public a platform to test, locking the top 27 was repeated twice more phone recharge worth a total of 457,850 yuan.<br> <br>The telecommunications system is faulty<br> <br>"Telecommunications System Fault" is also a concern in this case the key word. Kunming Telecom Co., Ltd. commissioned the Yunnan Kunming Branch Communications Products Quality Supervision, Inspection Station, the company's intelligent switching tandem office and billing systems (the province converged charging and billing system) for testing, the conclusion is: the system all qualified .<br> <br>Proceedings<br> <br>The case has retired Detective 4 times<br> <br>After the verdicts,http://marvelous21.sakura.ne.jp/enkaijoh/light.cgi?res=83", Chen should, Rao Jin Tao refused to accept the Kunming Intermediate People's Court of Appeal. Kunming Intermediate People's Court on October 28, 2008 ruling in the case facts are unclear and insufficient evidence cassation, remand. The case investigation back four times, from the first trial case to retrial has been almost two years time.<br> <br>June 15 this year, after a number of supplementary investigation and post-trial, Chen should, Rao Jin-tao couple standing on the judgment seat third Panlong Court. Panlong Court ruling yesterday after re-trial.<br> <br>Hear opinions<br> <br>Indeed acts constituted theft<br> <br>Panlong District Court that: Chen should, Rao Jin-tao ignore national laws, illegal possession for the purpose of the secret theft of property of others,louboutin pas cher,http://tuonela.s138.xrea.com/lightbbs/light.cgi?res=7150, his behavior constituted theft. Case,woolrich outlet, the two defendants knew their actions would infringe on the interests of the telecommunications companies, however, want such a result, with the objective to jointly implement mutual repeated use prepaid card recharging behavior,doudoune moncler soldes, subjective common crime, and the two defendants are specifically involved in the recharge prepaid card use illegal behavior, is simple common crime, should bear responsibility for their criminal acts are involved. Chen should,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/spark-inc/kit-55wu-h11-183.html, Rao Jin-tao huge amount of theft, according to law shall be sentenced to ten years in prison. Given Chen should, Rao Jin-tao was found to produce mens rea telecommunications recharge after a system malfunction, or deliberate behavior and the use of criminal damage to a computer system is different, the occurrence of cases have a certain chance. Accordingly, the court appropriate sentences for two defendants. Chen should Couple guilty of theft and sentenced, jailed for 10 years,http://www.sustainabilitystore.com, divided fined 20,000 yuan, continue to pursue suspects and the confiscation of proceeds of crime tool.<br> <br>Chen should know the results of sentencing, he still insists he is innocent,louboutin soldes pas cher, but whether it will appeal, was not immediately clear. Reporter Bai Licheng body Lei Xia (Spring City Evening News)<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
the conclusion is
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.