DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

for Jin Zhang Xia fine of $ 100

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by olape993792

  1. olape993792
    Member

    <br>Legal Evening News (Reporter correspondent Wang Wei Qiao Zeng Yi Wang Lingfang) a traffic accident,louboutin soldes femme, the injured as a claim for lost income 110,piumini woolrich,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/t2n363.html,000 fake income evidence, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the new "Civil Procedure Law" in a briefing this morning in the hospital, for Jin Zhang Xia fine of $ 100,http://www.uic-highspeed2008.com/historic/spip.php?page=forum&id_breve=5/,000. This is the city court since 2012 the new "Civil Procedure Law" after the implementation of the individual acts of bad faith litigation out of the highest "ticket."<br> <br>September 2012, injured in a road accident sued the driver Zhou,woolrich outlet italia, Zhou unit and insurance company claims 11 million yuan lost income and other damages.<br> <br>Jinchang Xia is a life insurance salesman Beijing branch agency. First instance trial, Jinchang Xia submitted proof of income wages, but failed to provide evidence of reduced income after the injury. Therefore, the Court of First Instance did not support the claims of their lost income,http://www.middleeast.org, the verdict the insurance company to compensate Jinchang Xia 1886 yuan. After the first trial, Jinchang Xia appealed.<br> <br>In the second trial process, is proven to reduce their income, submitted a life insurance cover has a seal of the Beijing branch of Human Resources' income decreased proof ",woolrich outlet italia," salary monthly income proof,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/idealtime/sr107.html, "but refused to submit to the Court of wage bank water single, personal income tax clearance certificate.<br> <br>The court summoned to appear in court for a Life Insurance Beijing branch, show that the company has not issued through the two above-mentioned certificate. After court than right,http://coordisnap.com, not a seal on the two proof of the company's chapter. In one hospital in the transfer of water payroll bank slips, personal income tax clearance certificates showed injured during the corresponding wage income and has tax.<br> <br>After the court found that the above-mentioned facts,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, the evidence submitted forged Jinchang Xia readme.<br> <br>In a court hearing that its claim Jinchang Xia refused to submit evidence against forged evidence in its favor, a serious impediment to the trial court's order, contrary to the principle of good faith litigation, while in violation of the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, should I discipline. In accordance with the new "Civil Procedure Law,http://bbs.pinggu.org/?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=," the provisions of Jinchang Xia fined 100,000 yuan.<br> <br>At 9:30 on October 20, an Intermediate People's Court announced: Pets Jinchang Xia withdraw the appeal, also announced its decision to forge evidence of punishment.<br> <br>Jinchang Xia did not mention in court for reconsideration, and said that it has recognized the illegality of their actions and harmful.<br> <br>The judge told reporters the decision on punishment to achieve the "Civil Procedure" for the maximum amount of individual fines for several reasons: the plaintiff Sike company seal, refused to submit to the already unfavorable forging evidence and other legal action a serious impediment the trial court's order and the people; contrary to the principle of good faith litigation, deceive the court; the most important is that our country has violated the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law.<br> <br> Related Links<br> <br>August 31, 2012 announcement and implementation of the "People's Republic of China Civil Procedure Law" of the individual amount of fines has been modified.<br> <br>According to "Civil Procedure Law" provisions before the amendment,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/furaha/innerwear.html, fines for individuals should be less than $ 10,http://www.webloop.info,000.<br> <br>Revised "Civil Procedure" this limit will increase to 10 million, can be said to greatly increase the penalties for individuals.<br> <br>(Original title: court falsifying evidence Woman fined 100,000 after crash claims against lost income 110,000 fake proof of income in a court of appeal open its new "Civil Procedure Law," the implementation of the highest individual "tickets")<br><br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.