<br>(Reporter Jiang Yue in) cells and the property industry,louboutin pas cher, the Commission signed the realty service contract, allowed to raise property management fees,http://www.sakanatsuri.net/advert/light.cgi?res=15, are the owners to court,http://www.menqiu.com/bbs/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, asked to confirm the contract null and void. This morning, Baoshan District Court found that this practice undermines the rights of property owners verdict realty service contract signed by the two defendants in Article VII provisions on commercial buildings property management fee of 2.50 yuan per square meter is not valid.<br> <br>The plaintiff alleged that Mr. Chen, he is the owner of Gu Tai Road 11,http://buntyn.stamina.jp, 13 shops,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, 19 February 2011, the District Court Yi River Po Park Property Owners' Committee and Management Co., Ltd. under the plaintiffs unknowingly signed property services contract, without the property management fee to 2.5 yuan per square meter per month,Chaussure louboutin pas cher ,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/spark-inc/kit-35w-h3c-10.html, the plaintiff in October this year due to other proceedings before that matter, that the behavior of the two defendants undermined the legitimate rights and interests of the plaintiff, so the prosecution to the court for sentence realty service contract entered into in order the two defendants Article invalid.<br> <br>The court found that the plaintiff Department Store owners Gu Tai Road No. 11,Chaussures louboutin,http://serenitius.com, 13, the district originally Po Park Property property management company. January 2011 the establishment of the owners of the district committee, February 19 the same year,http://bbs.xbkfw.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3902530, the two defendants signed a property services contracts, Article conventions,louboutin soldes,https://fis.encs.concordia.ca/helpdesk-cgi/quota.cgi, townhouses monthly property management fee 1.70 yuan per square meter per month per square commercial buildings m 2.50 yuan.<br> <br>The court noted that the two defendants before signing the realty service contract, only sent to the owners of townhouses had sought a single, not to business owners,louboutin pas cher, including the plaintiff sent a single consultation, did not explain to the shop owners to improve property management fees 2.50 yuan, so the realty service contract signed two defendants in terms of Article VII per square meter of commercial space on the property management fee of 2.50 yuan per month is void.<br> <br>(Original title: court decision price clause is invalid)<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
are the owners to court
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.