YA00beWpfE « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

YA00beWpfE

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by 8g1eS6Aj1Sa

Tags:

8g1eS6Aj1Sa
Member

Before the results of the review soon Liang look melancholy. After reviewing the results came out sounded Liang sunlight. National media containment Liang attorney interviews,47P2DfyXLb,louboutin soldes femme. Text / reporter Liu Dan, Wang Na, Gao Jing, Wang Wanli, Ke Xuedong map / reporter Xuan Hui (Reporter correspondent Liu Dan Zhu Xiangshan, JJ) Bao'an District of Shenzhen City Procuratorate said yesterday, Liang on suspicion of theft case,WMyC5BTN45, because of insufficient evidence, Bao'an District Prosecutor's Office decided to revoke their bail measures. Video: Shenzhen prosecution finds that workers "pick up" does not constitute a theft of gold Source: Shenzhen Satellite TV "Noon 30" Bao'an District Prosecutor's Office on April 3, 2009 Liang accepted the prosecution's case on suspicion of theft,piumini woolrich sito ufficiale, to check to verify the circumstances, the hospital has twice returned to the public security organ for supplementary investigation, the public security organs on August 13 the second check up restated. Because of difficult and complicated case, the hospital on September 13 to extend the period for examination and prosecution, is now the end of the review. Bao'an District Prosecutor's Office in the prosecution phase of discovery, based on current facts and evidence,6gkS8MwYhD, the factual evidence of the whole case review study that Liang's behavior although theft features, but lack of evidence constitute a theft, and more in line with embezzlement the constituent features. According to the principle of "criminal suspect but light" from the point of view in favor of Liang, Liang found the hospital does not constitute theft. The prosecution explained that since the case of embezzlement of public prosecution is not under the jurisdiction of the prosecution, which belongs to private prosecution case, in accordance with relevant provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law" and "People's Procuratorate Rules of Criminal Procedure," the Bao'an District Prosecutor's Office decided to lift the bail Liang, returned the case to the public security organs and public security organs will recommend relevant evidence material to the private prosecutor,air max 90 pas cher, private prosecutor and inform the relevant rights and obligations. Liang asked whether the behavior is determined by the private prosecutor private prosecution (the victim), would constitute an offense by a court verdict. Judiciary says Why the police investigation? Police officers must act immediately in order to establish the facts. Although the case ultimately found Liang's behavior constituted embezzlement, is "do not sue to ignore," the case of private prosecution, but the public security organs of the case on file for investigation both necessary and do not violate the jurisdiction of the filing requirements. First, the public security authorities received a warning after the victim, according to the law must be accepted and the necessary preliminary investigation. The fact that the public security organs at the time of the situation and identify evidence-based, Liang suspected of stealing its investigation does not violate the relevant provisions of the filing jurisdiction. If the public security organ does not immediately initiate an investigation and take prompt action, it is impossible to ascertain the facts and recovered back to the related items. Why seized homes to arrest Liang? There was evidence to suggest that there is evidence of a crime and Liang huge amount involved,11ffUR76L0. First, the arrest and prosecution of the certification requirements and conditions are different. According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, the arrest of certification requirements is the fact that there is evidence of criminal prosecution requires proof of facts is clear, there is ample evidence. It does not require that there is ample evidence to arrest, only to have evidence to prove facts of a crime can, obviously better than the prosecution requested a qualitative difference. Therefore, it does not prove the prosecution request to apply part of the arrest. Public security organs for approval Liang arrest, prosecution was based on evidence and facts of the case situation, there is evidence that the Liang facts of a crime, and a huge amount of crime, may be sentenced to imprisonment or more severe punishment, it is necessary to arrest, which approved the arrest Liang, compliance with the statutory conditions of arrest. Key facts from the beginning to see Liang claimed to "pick up" video seems to "take" 1. The cartons are not involved in the trash bin, but in the front luggage trolleys 19 1 beige line at the counter was removed Liang. Bao'an District Prosecutor's Office specifically on the case of a few key facts Liang explained to the media: According to victims' statements, witness testimony and related site surveillance video showed the incident was, involved in cartons placed baggage trolleys are parked in a separate victim Wang the yellow line at the front desk 19 1 m, the nearest trash there are about 11 m distance. Liang himself next to the trash can on the "pick up" to justify cartons involved with the facts,sESf2wE9y9. He argued that there were witnesses in the video showed no one 2. Before Liang involved cartons move luggage trolleys on the next trolley did not find the presence of other officers,Finding Success With Digital . I argued that the incident was Liang, saw a 50-year-old woman with a child, the child sitting on a luggage trolley basket, the two and another young woman in a hurry to enter the checkpoint to leave. At that time, in the luggage trolley basket stood a small cardboard box (ie involved carton), after three or four minutes to see no one to take, that the passengers do not ask anyone coming after a small cardboard box to move their cleaning cart. According to victims' statements, witness testimony related to site monitoring and video display, the above situation does not exist. Look in the end is half a carton greedy or stupid? 3. From the left to the victim involved Liang took a carton for about 1 minute. According to victims' statements, witness testimony related to site monitoring and video display,moncler outlet milano, leaving the victim 19 times with counter Liang reach 19 cartons involved in counter was placed baggage trolleys time distance of about half a minute. Thereafter, the view from Liang involved carton to carton from the counter 19, lasted about half a minute. Police door cover in the end is still hiding or worry? 4. stolen goods is not involved in the initiative on Liang to the police,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, but was forced to admit and surrender after police found. After investigation, the incident that day 16 am, find a colleague Jo Liang, told the airport terminal passengers lost gold,vvtmFy5lDF, and has an alarm. After 18 pm,JAQ73Sey3G, three police investigators to Liang home, work documents show that the identity, Liang husband opened the door, the police according to law Liang whether the property back from the airport for questioning, Liang denied. The police then its lasted more than 20 minutes of advice, in the process, police found Liang home in the living room under the bed storage boxes, cartons Liang then forced to admit that the airport is missing cartons. Liang was afraid I argued with fake police turned over the stolen goods in a timely manner without saying the truth. It should be understood to artificially real police, the purpose is to find the suspects to the carton. Shenzhen prosecution finds that workers "pick up" does not constitute a theft of gold Source: Shenzhen Satellite TV "Noon 30" Play Video It has _COUNT_ reviews I want to comment > Related reading: When workers "pick up" does not constitute a theft signature gold excitement tremor > Progress of the case: September 10 cleaners "pick up" golden case, the parties were released on bail (Photos) July 13 airport cleaners picking up gold again returned the case for supplementary investigation police May 19 workers "pick up" the case of gold continued: owner said they had not investigated the responsibility of the parties May 14 workers "pick up" three million gold continued: Prosecutors sent back for supplementary investigation police May 14 workers "pick up" three million gold continued: Police found guilty of stealing secrets May 12 workers "pick up" three million gold continued: Procuratorate responded yet qualitative March 12 workers "pick up" by 3 million yuan gold may respondent Theft (FIG) > The parties to the dispute: Cleaners pick up three million gold case continued: Lawyers debate how to sentence on sin Workers "pick up" the case of gold continued: Experts say not comparable with Xu Ting Guangdong High Court president to talk about workers "pick up" three million gold suspected theft Liang counsel: I have always believed Liang innocence Expert Interpretation cleaners "pick up" Golden Case: Details determine guilt or innocence > Depth investigation: Workers "pick up" 3 million yuan of crime or gold Liang pick up gold case visit: 10 hours from the cleaners to prisoners (FIG) Zuiyufeizui controversy workers "pick up" the case of gold behind > Related cases: Man malicious withdrawals Pipanwuqi (Xu Ting) 17 fishermen were sentenced to salvage the sunken ship at sea jailed for theft 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.