<br>Express reporter Liu Qian<br> <br>Marriage signed the "agreement the couple" may then demand compensation for divorce. Because repeatedly been domestic violence, Ms. closing desperation to divorce her husband, Mr. Zhang, with this "marital agreement", to her husband claims 400,000 yuan. After the first instance the case for retrial,peuterey spaccio outlet, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court ordered Mr. Zhang compensation for closing Ms. 400,000 yuan. The judge reminded, as long as the agreement is the couple's true intention, according to the principle "agreement is greater than the statutory" the case should be given priority under the general agreement between the parties apply.<br> <br>Married sign the agreement stipulated compensation<br> <br>In 2005, Mr. Zhang and Ms. closing the registration of marriage, both are married, have children after marriage did not.<br> <br>In 2006, the two signed the "Agreement husband and wife" for personal property, common property, debts were agreed upon, including special agreement, "according to" Marriage Law "Article 46 stipulates that there is bigamy, who has a spouse and others cohabitation,http://reverse-seo.net, domestic violence, and one case of abuse and abandonment of family members,http://sukibara.seesaa.net,orecchini tiffany, leading to divorce, there are the innocent party must pay compensation to the innocent party, the amount of a payment of 400,woolrich sito ufficiale,000 yuan. "<br> <br>Marriage, Mr. Zhang and Ms. frequently closed because of financial problems of conflict, Zhang also move several hand beats his wife. In December 2007, Mr. Zhang will play off Ms. caused minor injuries,hogan outlet,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/gx-56-1a.html, so he was sentenced to the Court of intentional assault control six months.<br> <br>Subsequently, due to unbearable domestic violence, closing Ms. filed for divorce, according to Mr. Zhang and asked "the couple agreement," agreed compensation for 400,000 yuan.<br> <br>Court of First Instance ordered Mr. Zhang compensation for damages closing Ms. 50,000, granted the couple divorced. However, both sides appeal,woolrich sito ufficiale, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court upheld the original verdict. Ms. closed to protest after the Guangdong Provincial Procuratorate,http://repository.musashi.ac.jp, the case for retrial.<br> <br>Sentence "the couple released" effective<br> <br>Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court retrial think, Mr. Zhang and Ms. close to April 16, 2006 signed the "marital agreement" is both true intention of the parties, there is no violation of the mandatory provisions of national laws and regulations, it should be recognized as legitimate effective.<br> <br>From the parts of "marital agreement" reflects the content of the two sides agreed to 40 yuan compensation, including compensation for material damage and mental damages. The trial verdict will be 400,000 yuan compensation are recognized as compensation for moral damage, and then finds that the amount is too high, it is biased.<br> <br>Mr. Zhang and Ms. closing times of domestic violence, has reached the level of a criminal offense, give closing Ms. physical and mental health have caused serious damage,http://www.fishinfo.com, even though a considerable loss in accordance with the principles of personal injury, agreed 40 yuan compensation not too obvious. Thus, in a retrial, Mr. Zhang 400,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/wide/63142-.html,000 yuan to pay damages to Ms. closed.<br> <br>×× "marital agreement"<br> <br>"According to the" Marriage Law "Article 46 stipulates that there is bigamy, who has a spouse living together with others,http://www.51yam.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, domestic violence, and one case of abuse and abandonment of family members, leading to divorce, there is no fault to be at fault party to pay compensation in the amount of a payment of 400,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/topism/denim-21-topism.html,000 yuan. "<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
it should be recognized as legitimate effective.
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.