Criminal psychology expert Li Meijin (piece of information)<br>Due to "forced murder piano Law" have been accused of criminal psychology expert Li Meijin:<br> <br>I can not say kill drug Xin<br> <br>Not enough to appease the resentment<br> <br>□ He Weifang: Do not hesitate to approach the masses revelers killed a man<br> <br>□ Meager: the public will accept the views similar to their own<br> <br>He took the knife to tie this girl, I think his action is in his heart has wronged, if he has pain, he had resigned, when he was pressed on the piano playing in front of one and the same action. - Review of Li Meijin Xin drug house<br> <br>Killings Majiajue nothing to do with poverty, nothing to do with discrimination, should be responsible for this murder, not social but Majiajue himself. The existing law, there is no provision, after committing such crimes, simply because of poverty can be mitigated punishment.<br> <br>- Li Meijin Review Majiajue<br> <br>The perpetrator does not necessarily need to make a great injustice, not necessarily reasonable grounds, a lot of crime is very stupid.<br> <br>- Review of Patrick Li Meijin<br> <br>Old miner's pneumoconiosis by 86 yuan pension rule<br> <br>Zibo: an industrial city "rule asthma dilemma"<br> <br>Wikipedia, the criminal psychology expert, professor of criminal psychology Chinese People's Public Security University Meijin personal profile, once modified to "well-known crime family bleaching, bleaching for crime has considerable experience." Disaster from March 23, Xi'an Conservatory of Music student drug house Xin murder trial that night, Li Meijin reviews said the CCTV, the reason why the drug will be completed even tie 6 knife action in an instant, and his long-standing training in piano. Soon, Lee's statement was friends known as "murder forced the piano method" is to justify drug offenses. He also caught Lee saliva into the sky.<br> <br>Recently, Li Meijin exclusive interview.<br> <br>Super intern reporter Chen Jiang Xue<br> <br>On the "net curse"<br> <br>"They wear colored glasses and emotional attack me."<br> <br>Reporter (hereinafter referred to as "mind"): Online now condemning many of you, how to treat?<br> <br>Li Meijin (hereinafter referred to as "Lee"): indeed particularly beyond my accident, because I think it is a normal hotel. But I personally would also reflect on how we create this illusion.<br> <br>Reporter: Do you think the cause?<br> <br>Lee: I feel there is a reprint of the earliest online a lot, named "Professor, do not doubly dead" Bowen precisely this blog to summarize what I called "murder forced the piano method." This argument was brought up, many have not seen the video, users do not even know before and after the procedure, they think he is a generalization, so I began to curse.<br> <br>If we look at the video directly, there will be all kinds of stories, but now we are unified with the "murder forced the piano method."<br> <br>Note: If there is not a drug house Xin transferred military background,S5KiAd8b1Q, will not have the situation now?<br> <br>Lee: Criminal Case, Qiu Xinghua case and the Yang Jia case, the public tend to crime, because the first few people in the public eye are all weak, with the exception of family medicine Xin is not. But in fact look at the drug material, he did a complex background, China has tens of thousands of such families.<br> <br>On the bottom line<br> <br>"I can never say no to kill drug Xin insufficient to appease the resentment."<br> <br>Reporter: Some media think your reviews do not take into account the "appropriate technical and legal context of the discourse," is one of the reasons leading to the storm. You blog, an endorsement of that view.<br> <br>Lee: Context is very important, I did not analyze that day "drug house Xin sentenced to what the punishment," but the direct analysis of his "action origin" inflict "for him to find a reason," the illusion - expert perspectives with the public differences in perspective led to this illusion.<br> <br>Reporter: Do you think that most Internet users to express what you want to view in the show?<br> <br>Lee: I understand now, they let me talk about is drug Xin heinous crime, not to kill not enough to appease the resentment. They want this sentence, but as an expert I absolutely can not say this.<br> <br>Reporter: how to explain?<br> <br>Lee: I have reason. He is not got to be the decision of the Court. I did not review the case, you can not make that judgment. If you do that kind of judgment can find criminal law experts. I'm a criminal psychologist. I can not say that is not got to where he got to. Called public trial, I, as an expert, I can not do public trial.<br> <br>CCTV another column, we have an expert commented that "do not kill not enough to appease the resentment," How many of us down after the crusade against him ah. How can you say something like that, you're still a law professor in that place. We ourselves in this crusade against the professor, how can I say that on that occasion in that case, so I did not answer in the CCTV is not even medicine from the capital. Because I did not review, we can not make a judgment.<br> <br>On the mind<br> <br>"I focus on the psychological analysis of his scratchy background"<br> <br>Reporter: Do you think CCTV What do you want to interpret?<br> <br>Lee: I have to say it motive for the crime? He himself said, "I injured as good as killed, I was trouble." I got there (CCTV) told the audience that this was a deliberate murder, and that my reviews are too funny.<br> <br>I think CCTV is concerned,moncler Outlet, this is a well-educated person, why in the case of no premeditation, and instantly pierced so many victims knife, make such a terrible thing. We want to see cases of behavior in his background, what is more important is prevention. I think it needs is the answer, of course I want to explain that this is a problem.<br> <br>Reporter: But the public does not seem to understand this momentary action reviews and to seek answers have any contact.<br> <br>Lee: usually in the background have multiple action anger behavior, even when you call me angry, often a word can not be Jiehen. So, drugs in the incident that night, in his first time up sword to kill, he is fear or anger it more and more? My conclusion: he should fear more, he should tie a twice wanted to run, and may even appear by accident and fear can not be controlled trembling.<br> <br>But he did not even so much in an instant bar knife, why he did not worry about,i4H8su58ie, why did he keep? This is the crux of the problem. So, I analyzed the operation of his scratchy psychological background: Long-term mechanical movement, the long-term isolation with people, forced long-term psychological problems practicing and the like - artistic and lack of humanity. So I think it's about playing the piano with him, what is wrong?<br> <br>Q: Your goal is that by analyzing the reasons for abnormal behavior, and to avoid more "medicine."<br> <br>Lee: I want to reflect on his question in the origin of which - is the only skill, no emotion. I asked what he liked musician, he replied Chopin, romantic. But we all know that if you want to practice Grading is a technical song. To be honest, shuffling back and forth ten fingers, ten to test how much he had practiced the song? Thus, he experienced what, I do not know how many people understand this process. And we now have many parents want their children to become Lang Lang, and we are repeating the road, this is my reflection. All the skills, the arts, so that the child must have a knowledge of human nature, when worthwhile. You say these words I understand how no one? These include university professors, what Peking University, Tsinghua University.<br> <br>On Expert<br> <br>"You're too conceited others professional field"<br> <br>Reporter: As you said, a lot of celebrities including Mr. Xiao Ying, Tsinghua University professor of aesthetics,PJ53weQTD4, there are different views on your point of view.<br> <br>Lee: I say "playing lead drug killings", you can not turn that he "murder is playing the piano." I said, "the ground is wet because it rained," you can not say I said, "is equivalent to a wet rain", which is a logical error. Many (my accusers) expert professional if not do this, this understanding, logical error is unwarranted. Now these are not my words, it has become what I say. Then he came to criticize you, and you can not defend themselves.<br> <br>Reporter: In addition to publishing blog to respond Xiao Ying, and what else he communicate?<br> <br>Lee: I politely find Professor Xiao Ying's blog, left a sentence: Professor Xiao biggest difference between you and I, too conceited in your area of expertise among others.<br> <br>I think these words slightly academic literate person should understand, let alone the. If you have to say when it comes to the point. Do you want to ask around psychology professionals, I say there is no reason at all. But I think he does not understand, which is later why I no longer care for him.<br> <br>On voices<br> <br>"Understanding is not eager to be able to have"<br> <br>Reporter: Do you desire to be understood?<br> <br>Lee: I do not desire, some things are not eager to have used, but not the first time I experienced this kind of thing. Criminal Case to Qiu Xinghua case, I no less scolded, including Yang Jia case. Faced with all this I am calm, I do not rush to explain.<br> <br>I think this is where the social differences. You as an expert to study the issue from a different angle, not everyone can understand you.<br> <br>I do not quarrel with them. But I think the most incredible is that some of our professors, I am so calm to reason with him he did not understand, he even attacked my personality, personality, you and I have come across it, do you understand my profession, what experts compulsive personality? I think this is our sorrow, how such a prestigious university professors, but also the nerve to accuse me again and again.<br> <br>Reporter: You are very disappointed?<br> <br>Lee: We are now Internet users impetuous and irascible university teacher,doudoune moncler pas cher, is reflected in our overall thermometer in today's Chinese society a transition period. I'm not angry, I think this is the reality, slowly face. But I hope that a few years later look back on the case, one would think, Li This analysis allows us to understand what the problem is particularly dangerous art education.<br> <br>Do professional analysis, how to avoid the next "drug house Xin" appears? Li Meijin: "The problem is not found, that is to dereliction of duty!"<br> <br>Jinan Daily news & nbsp; (Reporter Chen Chao intern Jiang Xue) & nbsp; because the CCTV "News 1 + 1" in the column, review of drug Xin case made professor of criminal psychology Chinese People's Public Security University, Li Meijin controversial, she had therefore once the public is no longer produced a review of the cases the idea. But this is only glimmer. "If there is no one to observe and analyze the drug Xin mental illness reasons, even if the kill drug Xin, still can not solve similar problems: we walk in the street, Paul missing then was hit, then was rolling again brick was crushed to death, and then tie Daozha dead. "Li Meijin, said her research should be respected, a lot of people can benefit, including more attacks her friends and their loved ones.<br> <br>"The problem is not found to be remiss warned"<br> <br>Reporter: For the drug Xin case, you most worried about?<br> <br>Lee: particularly worried about public opinion on the drug case "judgment." I guess the judges are not easy to finalized.<br> <br>Yesterday, I do shows, there is a guest lawyer said a lot, I did not have the nerve to stop him. I think a lawyer is to do this trip, he is wrong it should be,louboutin soldes pas cher, do not attack him. I do not agree with crimes of passion, because the case did not constitute a crime of passion: no words and actions of the parties to the conflict, there is no passion. But I never go because of this attack lawyer, I think his defense, his defense called things should be. He ate a bowl of rice, dry this live, they should speak on behalf of family medicine Xin. Legal punishment is a specific behavior, you have to kill to kill pay the price, but this does not mean you can insult people, to be abusive, I think it is two different things.<br> <br>Q: Will you still be the case for public review it?<br> <br>Lee: It was stained with BSE after the fall, in the case of unexplained, we will soon have a second, third down. If there is no one to observe and analyze the drug Xin mental illness reasons, even if the kill drug Xin,TSbxKa9T4e, still can not solve similar problems: we walk in the street, Paul missing then was hit, and then be compacted,woolrich outlet, and then be brick killed, and then tie Daozha dead.<br> <br>After the reviews I had caused so much controversy drug case, especially vicious verbal abuse, I really had this idea: no longer closed to the public after the review in any case. However, my research and my ethics tell me, when I discovered the reason behind the case and questions, do not tell the community, not to warn you, that is dereliction of duty. Because of this situation will soon be reproduced!<br> <br>I believe that my research can benefit a lot of people, including my friends attacked and abused and their loved ones. My research should be respected, not for me, but for our society.<br> <br>"I think I still have a bosom friend."<br> <br>Reporter: your peers to review your current certainly have concerns.<br> <br>Lee: I do not see the text, but in the Department of our university, almost all see my face peers say: online things we have seen,VTMJwY9jBp, you do not care for him, they do not understand. I said, "Thank you, in the end we are colleagues."<br> <br>Reporter: In addition to peers, there is no professional field expressed support for you?<br> <br>Lee: I received so much these days has always been little contact friends, sent a text message said: We looked at all of your video, we agree with you, you are right, do not be afraid. I was really touched to see these, I feel there are a lot of them do not need to live to please you, I recognized you. I still have a bosom friend.<br> <br>In fact, many reporters, including Mr. Chang Ling, I have not met, but the telephone connection - Huang Yong case she even told me over the line. These reporters do we really belong to the turn of the voice, not seen, but they are among the comments encouraged me, saying that Lee teacher you have to be strong, I say you worry.<br> <br>Today China is our most conscientious group of reporters. Gratitude is very light sentence, these things I have in mind. I think we have a common feeling is that we have a responsibility to society.<br> <br>Why users will ridicule expert? Meager: Select only public position and had similar views<br> <br>Xin drug house case raised a number of concerns, including the Peking University Law School professor He Weifang, Nankai University associate professor, a famous young scholar Xiongpei Yun,W9fuWv1CD4, a sociology professor at Shandong University Zhongwu including through micro-Bo, interview and other forms of expressing their views. Text / reporter intern Chen Chao Jiang Xue He Weifang: "the whole clan." I was shocked remarks<br> <br>Column for the latest issue of "Southern Weekly," published in the "public should take the form of carnival killed a man? "Professor He Weifang in individual micro-Bo said:" I argue has made it clear that if the information disclosed is true, according to today's criminal law and judicial practice medicine if sentenced to death, is hard to say a fair judgment. "<br> <br>He Weifang, also showed that the main criticism column for Professor Kong Qingdong, "his 'whole clan' kind words shocked me."<br> <br>"If you have the interest, can be retrieved online video, take a look at my colleague all reviews. Although full of indignation for all murderers, but I have to say, his words not often full of self-contradictions, and itself filled with air and harsh. thread users are mostly applauded joy. of course, we can make a decision according to the law a person to death, but do not take it to the masses the way carnival killed our fellow? "He Weifang said.<br> <br>Xiongpei Yun: Potential revenge is worse than<br> <br>In the "rediscovery of society", "Freedom in the high" and other works, many young scholars Xiongpei Yun stands for the abolition of the death penalty. Xin drug house case Xiongpei Yun again addressed Abolition of Death Penalty in microblogging. Published 10 this micro-Bo, Xiongpei Yun said:. "You (who advocates killing drugs) that since Patrick can kill, then kill drug Xin also be killed and I think the same can not save medicine Xin Yang was next court killed. this potential retaliation is in fact worse than that. "<br> <br>Bear seems more responsible approach is to facilitate the reconciliation of two drug Zhang, Zhang not to live in pain hatred inside. "You kill drug is also said Zhang justice, I say this is justice 'bloodthirsty justice'. When a mother loses a child, another son lost mother, day two never reconciliation. And you want to meet to the sense of justice, not to lose anything. "<br> <br>Meager: why the public would taunt expert<br> <br>Professor of sociology at Shandong University Zhongwu an interview with reporters, analyzes the public ridicule why experts become common practice.<br> <br>This requires two ways to look. First, the public is not demanding expert, it refers to the so-called experts in a particular field of expertise people. "Yao Ming can only play basketball, chess Nie only. You can not ask and get as good as Yao Ming Nie Weiping Go, the same can not ask Nie Weiping played basketball like Yao stick." The public needs to establish a scientific concept of experts.<br> <br>Meanwhile, Meager pointed out that the community does have some experts herd too kitsch, too strong a sense of social participation, independent of their own areas of expertise and have also required to participate, the results exposed the limitations of their knowledge, once the public received similar expert the harm, loss eaten experts, there will be great distrust of experts. "There is no reason to hate." Meager said.<br> <br>Specific to Public Security University, Professor Li Meijin was "hit" Meager analysis, the public only selectively accept their class, similar to the position of point of view, once the expert opinion and does not match the above conditions will naturally stand to the opposite side this can easily lead to violence network. In addition, the properties of the network determines the spread of Internet users do not need to participate on their own network responsible for causing violence,moncler outlet milano, which exacerbated a similar situation.<br> <br>Han Honggang:<br> <br>Multi-Context dislocation<br> <br>"Die Zeit" commentator noted in a review article in the context of dislocation between the expression Li Meijin, family medicine Xin murder, public understanding, resulting in the Meijin was "hit" phenomenon.<br> <br>Article, Li Meijin of drug killings in doctrinal interpretation is not nonsense, but do not yet meet the academic research system specifications before, with only a television station to provide video, they made impromptu analysis, apparently lost in rigor. In addition, Li Meijin not take into account the technical and legal discourse context suitability. Li Meijin public explanation considered as drug acquittal, the same as the loss of too. This misunderstanding mainly from a long-standing mental set that the judicial power is due to the loss of about a just, experts often do injustice to justice, "rationalization" excuse. In addition, this interpretative concept of "compulsive behavior" Lee used with drug defense counsel "passion killings" defended this concept,WYw9O9Uf5A, it is easy to be confused in the literal sense, in people's minds "and home "become all do to defend drug Xin crimes.<br> <br>The public explanation Li Meijin seen in "for the drug Xin acquittal", but also a bit lost in too when. In fact, Li Meijin explanation points to the killings of criminal suspects "comprehensibility." Her analysis is valuable, as pointed out by Li Meijin,YDyYAw0r27, nowadays lack of family education "psychological dependency" light to cultivate children's ability is not enough, we must cultivate humanity, in order to avoid the next Xin drug house. But the public yet this "understandability" understanding became a "defensible nature."<br> (Edit: SN021)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
vkntTY4eSA
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.