<br>Justice Net Beijing July 30 (Reporter Shi Yanyan) Recently, many media exposed, "after the man picked up a diamond ring 'throw away' Pipan Pei 46000," the text of a public triggered a heated debate,doudoune moncler soldes, since become the "Nanjing Peng Yu Fu after the "case," Shenzhen Liang pick up gold case "the third piece of a judgment is deviated from the general perception of the public questioned the boom triggered by the network case. In this regard, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court judge handling the case had to respond, the court's decision represents a fair and impartial,xqCAVNK0V1, no problem. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Justice Net: how the Court finds that Ms. Wang lost her ring invoice is provided in the alleged ring? & Nbsp;<br> <br>Zeng Judge: In legal terms, the burden of proof who advocate who, in this case the plaintiff claims she lost her ring is worth the purchase invoice of tens of thousands of rings, she submitted an invoice of purchase, the jewelry company also issued a proof Ms. Wang bought a diamond ring. Then she accidentally lost the ring, and the public security organs reported to the police, there is a report recording, from the chain of evidence is complete, and the court can identify the bird Wang lost her ring is provided in the invoice purchase ring. & Nbsp;<br> <br>From the opposite side, Zhang picked up a diamond ring will certainly be questioned, it is reasonable, but rise to the level of law and fact, questioned the need for the defendant to adduce evidence to prove themselves. For example, Zhang put forward their case picked up the ring is fake, or whereby guess ring invoice referred to himself picked up the ring and not a, which require the defendant to provide their own evidence. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Justice Net: There are friends questioned,LHJcksIDHA, to monitor definition video, the ability to image the rocket missing "ring" and Ms. Wang called rocket 4.6 million yuan in the same ring were identified? & Nbsp;<br> <br>The judge had: from surveillance video can be seen in Zhang Wang get off really picked up the ring, but did not clearly see the details of the ring. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Wang described the plaintiff, rubbed her hand in the car when the oil ring will come off on your lap, get off to forget,NCdAs6sF5l, so ring out in the parking place. The video shows that the defendant Zhang and Ms. Wang girlfriend after the car and saw the ring and picked up. Public security organs to find Zhang, he admitted. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Justice Net: Lost how to do the assessment of the price of the ring to judge it,VHvzOmnQPK? & Nbsp;<br> <br>Zeng Judge: Ms. Wang provided proof mainly invoices and jewelry company issued basis. Of course, the premise is to identify Ms. Wang lost ring invoice is proof of the ring, if the premise is not set up, the price evaluation judgment is untenable. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Justice Net: Judgment mentions that "Zhang Lost Property not properly kept, and has caused the loss of subjective intent", "subjective intent" is how to identify it? & Nbsp;<br> <br>Zeng Judge: judgment based on the case are the "Property Law", Article 109 of the Act provides that "Lost Property,louboutin soldes femme, shall be returned to the right people." That is,piumini woolrich, no matter how long the Lost Property,zUIA8ThscS, Lost Property the change of ownership is not going to happen, people should pick up the return of the missing person, a principle which is the legislation. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Keepers at a legal obligation to return from this obligation and extend the two obligations, one is notified and the transfer of obligations, that is, "Property Law" stipulated "Finders shall promptly notify the right holder to receive, or send the public security and other relevant departments "; there is a duty of custody, that is,k9PNouC3Mw, before the return or transfer of the lost property should keep the Lost Property Lost, if not properly kept, it may have to bear the corresponding legal consequences. & Nbsp;<br> <br>That case, Zhang said he picked up after a ring to his girlfriend in the bag,louboutin femme, and later went to other places, in fact,iPad 2 Prices – How Much is E, has been out of the scope of monitoring. Since Zhang picked up things away, it should be an obligation safekeeping, and later Zhang said he thinks the ring is fake it tossed, in fact, it is extremely irresponsible for the property of others. While this loss of expensive diamond ring missing people is not fair. & Nbsp;<br> <br>In addition, Zhang said he picked up the ring throw,piumini woolrich, this fact because he could not provide evidence, the court shall not be accepted. Zhang of the lost property held this laissez-faire attitude can be identified from Legally indirect intent, he had not done its due safekeeping, causing significant property damage lost people, should bear the responsibility. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Justice Net: The idea that Ms. Wang lost diamond ring should bear the primary responsibility for their own, others picked up the discards is a secondary responsibility, you agree with this view? Do not miss the major legally responsible? & Nbsp;<br> <br>Zeng Judge: There is no emphasis on this issue from the spirit of the law, it lost because people do not want to lose something subjective and may be due to negligence caused this and other infringement dispute is not quite the same. Currently from a legal perspective, is not liable for lost people, lost people have claimed Keepers returned. Also, if people have a reasonable finders fee when the custody of the lost property, this cost should be borne by the owners. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Background of the case: & nbsp,RM16NeI7HX;<br> <br>Wang lost in a parking lot a diamond ring, claiming the value of 4.6 million yuan. Site of the incident police retrieved video data and found that Zhang is Lost diamond ring. Zhang also admitted that he did pick up a ring, but argued that it was considered to be discarded fake diamond ring, did not care. After hearing that the court of second instance, Zhang did not take good care of the Lost Property, and has caused the loss of subjective intent, Ms. Wang should compensate 4.6 million yuan.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
K4N6tUDqXS
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.