Original in the indictment is to say « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

Original in the indictment is to say

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by 9g0i6SdA4S

Tags:

9g0i6SdA4S
Member

 A 37-year-old, a wife of Wenzhou businessmen in Hangzhou purchase process, understanding the sales lady 26 years of age. Recognize less than a month, a man that is heroic to "send" on BMW (worth over 410,http://www.codesria.org/spip.php?article2487,000 yuan). Three months later, the two broke up. Thereafter, the man on the court requires the woman to return cars. The lawsuit we have reported, it was last year when the Court of First Instance in Gongshu. Man was based on "unjust enrichment" to sue, the losing. Man, appeal, and was dismissed. The dispute has made a comeback this year repayment. This time, the plaintiff is a man's wife, counsel appearing for the last time a man or a lawyer. His wife told her husband,scarpe mbt, as well as the sales lady, meaning her husband to the girl's car models is jointly owned property, such disposal she does not agree,babyliss pro perfect curl,http://cdurable.info/spip.php?article4774, so the gift is invalid. Recent case finally closed in mediation, the sales lady also 30 million, the money from her to mortgage a BMW. This time Is a man's wife to sue the In fact, the discerning eye can see, the two lawsuits are the same purpose, requires repay the sales lady. Men and sales ladies get along very short time, but three months. Get a BMW for the issue, saying the two are not the same. The man said the girl asked him to borrow, as to why he borrowed, as in the purchase process, the girl out of the force to help him fight off. The woman said she just bought a Roewe less than a year, her economic strength will not buy a BMW, it is the man pursuing her before they take her. From the court, the man filed a loan dispute, but no evidence IOU not only irrelevant called "unjust enrichment." A second trial, men are lost. Unexpectedly, this matter went to court Gongsu. This time, the plaintiff is a man's wife, the demands of the gift contract dispute. BMW sales lady mortgage Also 30 million Original in the indictment is to say, she told her husband married in May 2000, the parties have not agreed in writing to be marital property, marital property as joint tenants. In 2012, the sales lady acquaintance with a man, "knowing he has a family, still associate with." This word, which means the sales lady is a small three. But whether this is true, worthy of scrutiny. According to the sales lady to say, when men hide their married thing, the two broke up three months to live, because the girl later learned the man was married, breaking up is the girl put forward. However, it still does not hinder the establishment of complaint by the wife of. Wife said that men take to conceal the way in January 2013, without first obtaining her consent, without permission will be jointly owned property 413,000 yuan gift girl for the purchase of a BMW sedan. Its gift behavior "should be invalid." From the legal perspective, the lawsuit makes sense to play from this point. As long as a man and wife during marriage is still subsisting, but they also have not been made to the marital property agreement, then the man took out more than 40 million car models really is jointly owned property, the large amount of unauthorized disposition, really damaged the property who is co-ownership interests wife. Original entitled to mention this proposition. It was also during this legal basis, the two sides agreed to mediation, and finally reached the sales lady to return $ 300,000. Why not pay off the full amount,babyliss curl secret, but 300,http://narcissu.doorblog.jp/archives/20584954.html,000 yuan, because the girls are also taking into account the losses. BMW had to send her man,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/furaha/bc2bishuta.html,karen millen sale, she gave her less than a year to open sale of Roewe. Girl privately with lawyers say, do not want to dwell on this matter,http://aclej.mshparisnord.org/spip.php?article39, and he has been very hurt, wanted to start a new life. In fact, all of a sudden she could get no so much money, and we have the BMW mortgage Couchu to 300,http://recit.cadre.qc.ca/~cmi/spip.php?article34,000 yuan. In this case, it is reasonable wife claims 400,000 yuan Since this 400,000 yuan car models is jointly owned property, in fact, it is only half of his wife, then her claim in this case is 400,000 yuan in full,scarpe mbt, make sense? Zhe Jiang Fengguo lawyer Probolinggo say,http://www.xq0757.com/read.php?tid=396849, in practice, there are indeed two kinds of precedents. For example, a few years ago she did a case,http://www.cosmologyathome.org/missing_arg_thread.html, the small juniors son, wife later sued for the return of a small three men in a few years to give her 200 yuan. Final court decision is the return of 100 million, it is the first wife of the then legal right to dispose of only half. But there are many precedents, is sentenced to refund the full amount, including legal like "two-step." Confirmed that this is a jointly owned property, either party can not be allowed to deal with, any unauthorized party grants a third party (such as a small three) are null and void, since invalid, it should be abolished. As for the grant to come back husband wife how points, this is another layer of legal relationship is between husband and wife or divorce of the analysis of production. (Original title: a report of three managed to send two BMW sales Miss "to" come back) (Edit: SN010) 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.