<br>After a director in the restaurant, the LV (famous French luxury brand Louis? Vuitton) bag left lying on the chair for the temporary custody of the clerk, it was found unexpectedly been someone else impersonator. The restaurant is not responsible for thought, is the director of court. Yesterday, the East's Court Restaurant assume custodial responsibility, the director compensation 4,000 yuan.<br> <br>Direct losses 47,886 yuan?<br> <br>For loss process, the parties are not greatly different. Director in the trial, said cash, clothes, glasses, dozens of bank cards and consumer cards, wallet, a plurality of U disk, memory cards, bracelets, prepaid card and a large number of film and television shooting material and other items within the package,louboutin soldes pas cher, direct loss of 47,886 yuan. Because the loss of material related to breach the plaintiff with a number of customers, indirect losses immeasurable.<br> <br>The restaurant side believes after leaving the restaurant more than an hour before I came back to receive the property, there is no fault in itself. And when the waiter handed the bag impersonator who verified the color package and other features. Jiang Xinxin is no evidence that the value of the package they lost, can not prove its genuine article real presence within the package and items. Restaurant as unpaid custodian, no obligation to open the package to verify the situation,http://www.adinm.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,piumini moncler, and within a reasonable range of the duty of care has been fulfilled, and therefore not liable.<br> <br>The court found both wrong<br> <br>The court held that the plaintiff will lose the briefcase in a restaurant after restaurant staff accused of Lost, should safekeeping. But others falsely claimed the package, failed to fulfill the corresponding duty of care of a good administrator, the identity of the impersonator, Lost article contents verified and gross negligence is the direct cause of the plaintiff property damage. However,http://www.zhuzhou.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the plaintiff did not fulfill the corresponding duty of care on the matter also occurred corresponding fault.<br> <br>For package goods, the plaintiff presented proof of purchase can not prove that the relevant circumstances package goods, it is for the plaintiff in the package goods loss,http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the amount of compensation to be determined by the court as appropriate. Final court judgment restaurants Leader Jiang Xinxin loss compensation losses 4,000 yuan.<br> <br>After the verdict, Jiang Xinxin expressed verdict restaurant liable to be recognized, "the amount of compensation would not be able to care about the loss of video is not easy to rumor, I have lost people money." The restaurant's agent said it would back to communicate with the person in charge. Morning News chief reporter Wang Bin<br> <br>■ News survey<br> <br>Users no longer worry about the future restaurant tube was missing<br> <br>For this verdict, the reporter to consult a number of restaurants, the restaurant's mixed reaction.<br> <br>A larger restaurant, said the restaurant has a set of generally more stringent procedures, custody, assist guests claim lost items, such as package allows guests to say some feature articles, in the case of the presence of the person responsible for the store to open package check to Some anti-impersonator, if guests do not agree with the police for help to resolve, so never had a similar dispute,http://bbs.weilanhaian.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, "because of improper storage compensation for the loss of the guests, it should be."<br> <br>Reporters had twice lost in the articles of the restaurant experience, claimed process is very simple, find the front desk after what is left behind to explain their article, the waiter immediately took to the reporter. One was in a fast food restaurant, the glass fell on the table, when the reporter returned to find the front desk staff said glass is not found, then found that the table has been cleaned, glass was placed next to the pot seasoning,http://kehuelga.org/diario/spip.php?article1060,moncler pas cher, staff did not care . Restaurant staff of such SMEs, said the store did not specify how to deal with the items left behind,http://www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article213, "I did not expect things to help keep the guests, have lost count of his own." The staff said, it seems that the future needs to be strengthened in this regard management.<br> <br>However, there are some restaurant owners said that while they are willing to take good care of the customer's belongings, but afraid of encounter "Pengci" in. If criminals falsely in a restaurant lost property, lost 100 yuan or $ 10,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595,moncler pas cher,000 claiming lost, if unable to provide sufficient evidence to refute, is not it also have to be forced to compensate ah? "In that case, we would rather lose customers was pretending not to. Kindly helped custody, it inadvertently while eating a lawsuit, really worth."<br> <br>When a reporter referred to "ignore the customers may have lost was responsible", the restaurant owner said: "I said, did not see, who can prove that you throw in my bag here?"<br> <br>Many users also believe that decision in that case may have some negative effects, may be a bit similar to the "Peng Yu case" are well-intentioned, but all sentenced to compensation. "After really worry about their own lost something, restaurants insisted not seen. The expense of those of us ordinary people ah!" There are friends that the restaurant should not be one hundred percent accurate demanding audit obligation, or risk the restaurant also pick up packages too big.<br> <br>Morning News chief reporter Wang Bin<br> <br>■ lawyers say<br> <br>Whether intentionally Lost Property legally responsible<br> <br>Beijing lawyer Li Hao Sheng Hongxing expressed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the "Property Law" Article 111, the restaurant in front of the lost property will be sent to the relevant departments should keep the lost property. The restaurant after the discovery of the lost property,moncler outlet italia, intentional or whether it is discarded should bear the corresponding legal responsibility. In addition, if you choose directly to the restaurant owner, you should check all the information in the relevant information about the owner of the package are the same, there is no corresponding information should leave the restaurant owner's identity card and contact information, so impersonator after Restaurants innocent bear responsibility for the situation.<br> <br>"In the present case, if the court during the investigation it was confirmed that the loss of place and pick up the package for the same place, or in the presence of discovery can be confirmed in the restaurant during the storage bag after departing controlled, you can be sure that the basic responsibility for the presence of the restaurant. On the contrary,http://www.zhuzhou.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, If you pick up the package and lost places in different locations, package goods taken away then there may be other customers, the restaurant should be basically exempted from liability. "Li Hongxing lawyer said. He suggested the restaurant the best treatment approach is to notify the police after the discovery of the lost property first time, and missing items to the police custody, to accept the police investigation of the scene. As long as the police can not determine the restaurant staff theft package of financial behavior, the existence of the financial package are nothing to do with the restaurant, no need to be responsible.<br> <br>Morning News reporter Xun Mi<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today (edit: SN034)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
is not it also have to be forced to compensate ah
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.