<br>Nanfang Daily (Reporter / correspondent Sheng very positive / Luzhu Ping Tan Zhihua) 14 years Xiaoming (a pseudonym) to a friend Ezhao loan 2 million,Vv1Ejjs9M9, the borrower may fail to repay, A Zhao Xiaoming ordered their parents to court,moncler Outlet, required to repay the loan together 20,Jr28byi7Qc,000 yuan and interest payments and travel expenses totaling $ 1,000. Recently,doudoune moncler soldes,waljvpM494, the South China Sea,woolrich outlet, the Court of First Instance found,JnjOeT8N0X, and Xiaoming private lending relationship between the void,PV7nMeHUPU, but Xiaoming parents are required to return the money 20,000 yuan.<br> <br>○ case<br> <br>○ posing as 18-year-old loan 20,000 yuan<br> <br>Two years ago,louboutin femme, just two days Xiaoming hooked on online games. Tube with parents,M94iVJ99Uc, can not play at home, so he secretly went to Internet cafes to play, and met together to play online games, than his 13-year-old . One to two to go, the two gradually conversational after usually play online games, often late night together.<br> <br>Met more than a year later, in June 2011, one night, A Zhao Xiaoming told that he lost money gambling,uRMP6603Vd, to borrow 20,000 yuan debt. Out of loyalty to friends, Ezhao scrape together the money to a few friends, lend Xiaoming. Xiaoming to write IOUs, to confirm the borrower $ 20,000 a month period, and wrote his own ID number in the signature area. A Zhao Xiaoming saw only 14 years old, they will not agree to borrow money, Xiaoming explained that his father helped him piecemeal age, he is already 18 years old, Azhao eventually agreed.<br> <br>However, a month passed quickly,tn reuqin pas cher, Xiaoming has no money to repay. He began dodging Ezhao later, simply do not even pick up the phone Azhao. A Zhao had the door to debt, Xiaoming this to the parents tell the truth; but with prior knowledge of their parents refused to repay. A Zhao claims failed, ordered Xiaoming be taken to court and their parents.<br> <br>○ judges say<br> <br>○ minors borrow large sums of money invalid<br> <br>South China Sea Court held that, when the case borrowings, the defendant Xiaoming only 14 years old, is a limited civil capacity or civil activities which must be conducted his age, intelligence to adapt. Relative Xiaoming cognitive ability, the amount of funds involved in this case is not a small number of the tens of dollars to several hundred dollars, but $ 20,000 large sums of money, and therefore loans have Xiaoming's age,, intelligence and incompatible . Further consideration should be given to the plaintiff circumstances Xiaoming as a minor, that he is not economic ability to repay, so shall inform the parents or claim Xiaoming Xiaoming go home and discuss with their parents, with the consent of parents before deciding whether to agree to the borrower. But in this case, the did not do so, it should be recognized private lending relationship between and Xiaoming invalid.<br> <br>But Xiaoming did payments charged $ 20,000 for causing actual damage to property, it should return the money to the defendant . Because when lending relationship Xiaoming still minors, so the loss of property caused by its 2 million, that is, its guardian parents should bear the return of civil liability.<br> <br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
OkO0V3F6Hq
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.