<br>Nanchang's first bus lane opened into the motor vehicle violations fined 200 yuan,karen millen outlet<br> <br>Dajiang News reporter Yin Kun reported: Some media reported that Nanchang from January 1, 2012 start, the bus surveillance cameras, vehicle violations can occupy the bus lane to shoot, and the bus surveillance camera shooting violations down,http://repo.kyoto-wu.ac.jp, as will be punished in accordance with the traffic police department.<br> <br>The move has been questioned by many people: the buses fitted with cameras to capture illegal, whether this force of law? How to deal with their own bus illegal? Is a violation of the Public Security Ministry shall establish covert filming and must be labeled with the provisions in a prominent position? August 8, Nanchang Dajiang reporter interviewed some lawyers,scarpe mbt outlet, they both said the move was illegal.<br> <br>States: Municipal Traffic Management Bureau, said the bus can be used for punishment of violations beat<br> <br>According to media reports on the illegal occupancy vehicle management bus lane, traffic police are usually placed at the intersection of the image capturing device to shoot. But some drivers do not use the time period taken by the traffic police,scarpe mbt,http://www.jphc.ne.jp/public/jphcbbs/jphcbbs.cgi, random occupation bus lanes. In this regard, Nanchang Traffic Management Bureau issued a "Nanchang city bus lane traffic regulations" in 2011,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001117220.html, it noted that the provisions, from January 1, 2012 start, the bus surveillance cameras will be able to illegal occupation of bus lanes vehicle to shoot. The bus surveillance camera filmed the violations,http://ted.pekori.to, as will be punished in accordance with the traffic police department.<br> <br>Lawyer: Bus companies are not law enforcement agencies have no right to capture evidence<br> <br>Dajiang reporter contacted several Nanchang good lawyer accepted the case of traffic accidents, they install cameras to capture the bus pavement illegal behavior questioned, that the move was illegal. Jiangxi Hua Chen Jianping matter of law firm lawyers believe that,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/asobi/sand-glass-3g83-02.html, despite the introduction of the Traffic Management Bureau of Nanchang City, "about the bus should be set on mobile intelligent capture system to capture traffic violations" of regulations,http://www.postyourshavedpussy.com, but the bus is not the traffic police enforcement tool, from the program it is illegal. "In general, the procedure is illegal parties are not legally binding, unless expressly provided law legal move." Chen Jianping representation.<br> <br>Jiangxi Changrong law firm lawyer Zhou Ze high Dajiang told reporters,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/menscasual/denim-4-menscasual.html, Nanchang bus company is not law enforcement, traffic police have no right to engage in law enforcement in place,http://www.afirmfwc.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi, so the evidence can not be taken by bus to punishment according to law enforcement units. "Even the joint law enforcement, bus companies do not have enforcement powers, parties can be punished to the courts." Zhou Ze high that the shooting vehicle road traffic violation main responsibility is to expand the scope of monitoring can be understood,babyliss curl pas cher, but this by the installation of cameras in the bus shooting illegal road from the program is not legal.<br> <br>"Bus camera is mainly used to ensure the safe operation of the vehicle,scarpe mbt outlet, the monitoring service and the driver ordered passengers traveling and other conditions, for traffic enforcement has not heard of the relevant law clearly." Zhou Ze, Gao said.<br> <br>Public: I hope the traffic control department give a specific explanation<br> <br>"Since the bus camera can shoot illegal road, that private car to install the camera footage is not to be used as the basis of the traffic police punishment it? Buses have become a tool for law enforcement police, who will monitor the bus illegal it?" Citizen Bruin We believe that the introduction of relevant traffic regulations should be considered reasonable, rather than saw the missing provisions implemented. "As a monitor (electronic eye) violation of road facilities are generally required to be clearly marked, and the bus and whether the camera comply with this requirement?" Xiong said. Nanchang public Liu hopes the traffic control department can give a specific explanation for the relevant regulations, according to the fair and equitable treatment of traffic violation cases.<br> <br>Edit: Ying Xiong<br> Welcome comment to share: microblogging Recommended<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
from January 1
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.