do not have to lose again account numbers

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

do not have to lose again account numbers

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by mlanf8727041

Tags:

mlanf8727041
Member

 33-year-old man Du Haiyan, has recently to a $ 180,000 payment anxious to get angry. Obviously their own money, but get it back under the sun as well as more than this "injustice" thing? Komori in Haiyan opened a metal factory. In mid-May, because the business dealings, he will give a man surnamed Chen remit 180,000 yuan loan. When can operate on online banking, accidentally transferred a wrong man surnamed Yu. It had a very simple thing, Komori find Shumou, the other very readily willing to pay back the money. However,http://www.jatone.or.jp, the two went to the bank teller, they were accused of Shumou bank account was frozen Court. Komori thought, the Court is unreasonable place, the total could get their money back. However, in court, he has suffered "a blow." The judge said the money, you must first take it for Shumou debt! Komori really anxious, what is this thing ah? 180,000 yuan remit the wrong man Go to the bank to withdraw money, the account was frozen Komori do hardware business,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/wfxa-rpen-swirl.html, often hand out large sums of money, he opened for the convenience of online banking. Online banking really brought him a lot of convenience and fast, but also led to the bank queue number, operational problems, the online banking remittance transactions anytime, anywhere. Available mid-May this year, he had a $ 180,000 loan, operational errors, wrong transferred to other people. Originally, this purchase price to be paid to Chen, and Chen Dumou always had business dealings in the online banking there and Chen transaction record, just a little finger, enter the amount,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/gion/cr-27266.html, passwords, a few seconds to complete the transfer. Komori, as usual, at the midpoint of the transaction for a moment, but he is in the points with the next transaction Chen Shumou name. He was also on hand at several things to do, did not look carefully, this money so unwittingly wrong remitted to Shumou. A few days later, Chen caller asked how the money not in place, Komori wondered, "clearly has turned ah?" He immediately checked the transfer records, cold sweat - that he was wrong to put money remitted to Shumou. Fortunately Shumou also his clients, recognize. Call to explain the situation on small Duma. For this fiscal heaven, the Shumou also very candid, "Not me, I can not get, but also you." Hear things picked up, Komori also landed the hearts of stone. So, they went to the bank. The problem here - the bank staff told Shumou the bank accounts frozen by the court. This 180,000 yuan after the turn into, do not get out. Komori's heart ah, but also put up. Shumou are willing to pay back the money Why insist on keeping the court may also Thereafter, the Komori and Shumou came Haiyan court, advising how to do this thing. It turned out that someone Shumou to sue, and asked him to pay back 300,000 yuan debt, and requested the court to freeze Shumou property. Afraid Shumou know the transfer of property, the court understand the situation, leading to the Shumou accounts frozen. Which know, to notify the court when Shumou, but a thing that it exists. Shumou do hardware of raw materials and the cash flow difficulties do exist, could not repay the debt maturity schedule. However, Shumou statement, "I owe money, but $ 180,000 Komori indeed his, just do not care to my account, to be returned to the people." However,karen millen outlet, the judge has explained that the two things are not so simple thought: First, the ownership of the money is already a Shumou. Legally, the money does not have a specific property, possession of all that is, at the time of the transaction can be replaced with each other. Currency possession of monetary deemed made on ownership, once delivered to others, where all the money is transferred to someone else. Money is very special, to be replaced. For example, you dropped $ 100, to be picked up, picked up the man spent, and later he gave you another one 100 yuan, is not necessarily goes out to your original $ 100, as long as the circulation when the equivalent value in use on the line. So, Komori $ 180,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/cio/n0100102181.html,000 already Shumou, and Komori to enjoy Shumou creditor may request reimbursement Shumou same amount of money. Second, Dumou to return the money, but also can take legal action to prosecute Shumou unjust enrichment, asking him to return. However,http://www.tukipie.net/comono/index.cgi, Komori enjoyed general claims and other claims of equality, not priority for repayment. Creditors have to freeze accounts Shumou 30 million of debt has expired, Shumou outstanding, also the general debt, the court in the implementation process, the first to freeze the seizure appeal, the Court first who helped dispose of the general debt first also to be, first served cold. Dumou hear cold sweat fly,karen millen outlet, Left had also Shumou to court,http://www.postyourasian.com, asking him to return the unjust enrichment 18 million. Recently, the court mediation sea salt, and Dumou Shumou reached a settlement agreement, agreed to return Shumou Dumou 180,000 yuan. Although the two agreements are reached very smoothly, but the past two years Shumou tight money, business was doing, but outside owed some debt, Komori to get back the 18 million, I am afraid not so easy to sink out a. Lawyers say Obviously their own money, someone else has to take the matter to debt This court finds that make sense? Zhe Jiang Fengguo law firm Chen Songtao: The court did it right. As the judge said, the money is not a specific thing, once the account who will not be able to distinguish, it would Shumou property. This is not the same items,babyliss curl secret, such as a set of equipment, send the wrong delivery warehouse, the results of this warehouse also happens to be sealed by the court. But the device can distinguish, can prove original ownership, as long as the courts do not belong to examine and determine the debtor can be returned to the original owner. But money is not the same, into the account once it mixed together. The court will be very cautious when handling. Figuratively, we need to make sure this money is really wrong, wrong or false. If someone hit the money to the court accounts have been frozen, and send money to the debtor party collusion, the court said the Department of talk together wrong, take out the requirements, how to Tell it to the judge? Now this case, we can not rule out this possibility. Court in the implementation process, if the debt is generally the case, whoever demands to freeze property seizure, the court who will perform the case. Unless the creditor has a mortgage,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/red-one/ik-0042.html, repayment priority. Or in the case of bankruptcy, wages, taxes and other priority for repayment. If the debt dispute before Shumou 300,000 cases not judgment or decision has not yet entered into force, the Court has not been executed, can apply for participation in the distribution Komori, maybe could be assigned to less than half. In real life, transfer errors are not too much. Whether it is online banking or pay treasure, are asked to fill in the person's name and card number, name and card number does not match, the money will be returned, most people are less likely to mistake. However, if the transaction is through online banking, there is transaction records, do not have to lose again account numbers,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001162918.html, names,karen millen sale, too careless, then there is indeed wrong turn possible. I took a case before, is online banking transfers, because the same names of two people, more than 300 million sinks into the wrong account. So, ah, something more convenient,scarpe mbt, more easy to make mistakes, especially when it comes to money, it must be long in mind. Newspaper correspondent Huang Yanming told reporters in Jiaxing Na (Original title: 180,000 yuan exchange also wish each other the wrong account, the court said "no") Edit: SN054 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.