<br>Beijing Times (Reporter Yang Feng-Pro) 25 years ago,http://www.okrogerm.org/forum/profile/lpsnt18171, women and ex-husband "divorce is not home," the two sides continue to live together; 17 years ago, her ex-husband the purchase,babyliss curl secret, the woman pointed her ex-husband's own use of the preferential policies, and himself He has funded that have their own half of the property. The two sides at loggerheads over the ownership of the property for the final court. Reporters recently learned from the Fangshan court, the Court of First Instance that her ex-husband the purchase process despite the use of incentives such as length of service of the woman, but the exact value can not be reflected, not as a share of ownership of the house found a reasonable basis. The court ultimately dismissed the claims of the woman.<br> <br>It is understood that,http://www.uic-highspeed2008.com/historic/spip.php?page=forum&id_breve=5/\"/,babyliss curl pas cher, in 1984,karen millen outlet, Liu Cheng and got married with no children. And not because of feelings, the two sides agreed to a divorce in 1990. After the divorce, the two sides remain cohabitation. In 1998, Mr. Cheng purchased a building, Liu Cheng considers the purchase is purchased in the name of husband and wife, using her various preferential policies and myself have invested.<br> <br>"We have not separated since the day after the 1990 divorce, marriage of fact. He was ill in hospital to see a doctor to give him all my money, people do not know that we were divorced when re-purchase of housing,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595, he also used my seniority Shipping Accordingly,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000000628099.html,karen millen sale, the half of my house. "Ms Lau said in the trial.<br> <br>Mr. Cheng is said excitedly: "It's because she was having an affair before we divorced divorced,http://www.iesuliafidentia.es/spip.php?article9, she does not move, I also relented to get her home but she often does not come back, sometimes at night also brought men back.." Mr Cheng said, when her ailing Liu not take care of themselves, but to come forward to help his brother and sister,http://www.zhuque369.com/home/space.php?uid=173767&do=blog&id=813112, Sharon has also taken away his salary.<br> <br>Cheng believes that housing is to buy their own after the divorce, Sharon no money, do not agree with each other to occupy the house. "I had also sued her,karen millen sale, let her move out from my house. Court of First Instance, upheld supported my request, and finds the owner of this house is my."<br> <br>Fangshan Court held that, Sharon failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove effective it has financed the purchase situation,http://digi.nce.buttobi.net, and thus is someone's house and advocate Liu Cheng joint property shall not be accepted. According to the facts found, after Liu Cheng and divorce, when Cheng buy someone's house, indeed Liu calculated length of service, and enjoy the relevant preferential seniority. But the court held that the state preferential seniority for employees at a preferential purchase,http://zhuque369.com/home/space.php?uid=177591&do=blog&id=813172, but a policy of subsidies, specifically the value of the policy can not be reflected, not property or interests in property, not as a finding of fair share of home ownership in accordance with. Based on the above reasons, the court ultimately dismissed the claims of Ms. Liu.<br> <br>(Original title: The man alleged that his ex-wife divorced buyers have taken)<br> <br>Edit: SN098<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
It is understood that
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.