<br>Judgment document from the point of view, in September 2013, the Shenzhen Municipal Supervision Bureau in the course of the investigation related to the case,polo ralph lauren soldes , just ask Liang investigation as a result, during the investigation on account of the investigation department Liang did not grasp the fact that the aforementioned number of bribery.<br> <br>& Nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Southern News reporter Xu Chao, Longgang District,mbt online, Building Works, a chief Liang was identified use Longgang court his office, repeatedly accepting bribes,MWryd4nBHF, the first trial sentenced in July to five years. Where he received a sum of HK $ 20 million, did not help trustees get things done, but give money to the boss said, "do not get things done,wNR9q0Bq4N, had to give money, this is the line regulation."<br> <br>200,000 Hong Kong dollars packed in tea bags sent<br> <br>Longgang District Longgang District Building Works is responsible for government institutions directly under the investment project construction management. Involved Liang, 43,jMr57aeN5G, from 2007 to 2013. During the incident, he has served as the council under the department deputy chief, chief, where sections are directly responsible for the specific organization in each area within the municipal street project implementation and supervision and management. He received the largest sum of HK $ 200,000 bribe from the construction contractor Zhuang.<br> <br>Zhuang is anchored by a formal company, the Longgang District to undertake public works --- & nbsp; Cotton Tree road construction projects, and Leimou hired as head of the project department. Later, I heard that the project Zhuangmou to tender, they gave the men Leimou 200,Professionals or Students Wh,000 Hong Kong dollars into the operating matter. May 2008, Lei 20 million Hong Kong dollars packed in tea bag, gave Liang Yijun, Liang hope to give care in the project tender.<br> <br>For the "operation" means, with Lei Liang in the testimony, confessions are well aware, that allow Yijun set some performance conditions in the RFP, and then find some of the Leimou qualified firm to conduct bidding for string mark.<br> <br>However, this project last change tender, open tender approach taken by the drawing of lots, Liang will not be able to give Zhuang "Help." Liang was once called Leimou claim your money back. However, Liang said, "Lei said, whether it is line regulation do not get things done,ralph lauren pas cher, not money back." In his testimony, Zhuang boss also generously said, the money just hospitality, entertained not necessarily " operation "successful, so I do not want to go back to the money.<br> <br>As municipal engineering regulators, Liang became the eyes of the construction side, "Red", holidays should honor. According to the Court found that the contents of the display, during the 2007 Spring Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival to 2013, the construction side personnel Longgang multiple projects, in order to get the help of Liang in the construction process, the Mid-Autumn Festival, during the Spring Festival to Liang office Get commissions, 22 total 113,000 yuan.<br> <br>Initiative to explain the facts of bribery during investigation<br> <br>Liang's arrest more accidents. Judgment document from the point of view, in September 2013, the Shenzhen Municipal Supervision Bureau in the course of the investigation related to the case, just ask Liang investigation as a result,qTFNQD2Rwi, during the investigation on account of the investigation department Liang did not grasp the fact that the aforementioned number of bribery. After the incident, the main Liang also return the stolen money more than 270,Hollister France,000 yuan.<br> <br>Trial, Liang's counsel made after Liang received $ 200,000 for others not for personal gain,How to Decide On Which Rocket, can not be considered bribery. Wherein Liang also received four 1 & nbsp; .6 million,s8uuI196OI, the amount of each only 4,000 yuan, 5,000 yuan bribes failed to meet standards of prosecution, it should not be considered bribery.<br> <br>However, the Court held that, 200,uPanIKNvPU,000 Hong Kong dollars Department know others have the trust property upon payment of the matter, it shall be regarded as committed to the benefit of others, should be included in the amount of bribes. Court also held that although Liang received four 4000 red envelopes,orecchini tiffany, but many times the amount of bribes and not to be treated should be cumulative, so 1 & nbsp; .6 square should also be recognized as bribery.<br> <br>The court found Liang and active presence surrender ill-gotten gains, mitigating the punishment, and ultimately sentenced him to bribery charges and was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment, confiscation of personal property 20,000 yuan.<br> <br>(Original title: "do not get things done, had to give money, which is norm")<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
p8aYQBK0n7
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.