<br>Longhu hearing traffic signals, meaning yellow light is a warning. Traffic police department clearly defined, into the yellow light is illegal. However, since late last year, an amber light in the end that should not break, but it became a public hot topic. The reason is that, in Haiyan County of Zhejiang judicial workers because Chuang Shu Jiangrong yellow penalty, the traffic police department to court, becoming the "Chuang yellow light" administrative litigation first. The day before yesterday afternoon,f720rPHtE9, Jiaxing City Intermediate People's Court made a final decision, upheld, Shu Jiangrong lost.<br> <br>Yellow can not "break"?<br> <br>July 20, 2010 morning, Shu Jiangrong driving small cars in Haiyan certain judicial work in Wuyuan Town, Haiyan Qin thrift Road and Road intersection, the traffic technical monitoring records,4wkycl2T1E, we have not crossed the stop line when the yellow light of the vehicle, the more line continue driving. The next day, Haiyan County Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade because Chuang yellow light, made the decision a fine of $ 150.<br> <br>July 11,extension des cheveux prix, 2011, Shu Jiangrong to the traffic police brigade to accept the punishment, signature and pay a fine. But Shu Jiangrong that the law does not expressly provide, "yellow light, we have not crossed the stop line of vehicles will remain in use," so punishment traffic police department's decision has no legal basis.<br> <br>Shu Jiangrong therefore refuses to accept the punishment,YF87ffu8rB, since embarked on a long road rights. First, on July 14, 2011 to apply for administrative reconsideration to the Haiyan County Public Security Bureau, after being rejected in the same year on September 26 administrative proceedings to Haiyan court after losing, but also appeal to the Jiaxing Intermediate People's Court on January 19, 2012. February 29, the two sides heated debate in the court of second instance,Nd17Ke35gD,diradamento capelli, cause public attention.<br> <br>Final judgment Chuang yellow line illegal<br> <br>The second instance court held that the present case the appellant break the yellow light of the legality of acts, involving significant public interest. On the one hand,B1ilIx9pk7, as an individual driver, what kind of right of passage when the yellow light is related to each driver's traffic efficiency and interests. On the other hand,HI9Le8aIn2,extension capelli clip, as a public road traffic safety system, how to accept the yellow way to ensure the safe passage of priority,extension capelli veri clip, the problem must be faced.<br> <br>Chuang yellow behavior is illegal, involving on the "Road Exchange Act Ordinance," the provisions of the "yellow light, the vehicle has crossed the stop line can continue to pass" the understanding is a question of legal interpretation. The law should be interpreted with the object and purpose of the legislation,2mv6kiA4g3, while in the internal logic of the legal system and semantic basis.<br> <br>After a full release of yellow green to red transition,RCSBnLFRdn, provided the purpose should be to convert red green buffer time, so that the green light during normal vehicle entering the intersection, but has not passed quickly through security, cross empty mouth of stranded vehicles for the green light to prepare the release of conflict direction. Prevailing at this time the focus has shifted to the direction of the conflict.<br> <br>For safe driving purpose, the provisions should be based on the understanding of "prudent norms" concept. That is when the yellow light, only the vehicle has crossed the stop line can continue to pass, in addition, the vehicle shall remain in use.<br> <br>This provision effectively means that the yellow light when the driver's right of way restrictions, limits are designed to maintain the security of road traffic. Values in this legislation is very clear that in order to protect public safety, traffic rights of individuals must be limited within a reasonable range. Thus, under the existing system of Road Traffic Safety Law, Chuang yellow line violations.<br> <br>The appellant insists still losing<br> <br>The day before yesterday afternoon, Jiaxing City Intermediate People's Court made a final administrative decision, recognized that the appellant break the yellow light is an offense which shall be subject to administrative penalties. Appellee administrative punishment procedures appellant legitimate law was correctly applied, the results of appropriate penalties. The original verdict facts are clear, applicable laws and regulations is correct, the correct decision to maintain the specific administrative act appellee. Appellant penalty decision finds that the facts and punishment according to the law proposed objection can not be established. Accordingly, the court rejected the appeal and upheld the appellant Shu Jiangrong lost.<br> <br>After several rounds of intense debate and trial court explained, Shu Jiangrong final verdict after the court expressed respect for the court, but the yellow light in the end should not "break" issue, but still insist on their own ideas. "After the yellow light that traffic is not exactly the same with the red light? That its cushioning how to play. When the vehicle is very close to the stop line when the yellow light suddenly lit, how to stop, moving object has inertia . "<br> <br>Because Shu Jiangrong itself is judicial workers, he said on this issue, will be in the form of research reports to the departments concerned. "First, ban ,, yellow traffic brought in the end it is safe or dangerous. Secondly, administrative penalty is not possible by virtue of reasoning and understanding for punishment,ciocca di capelli, which involves the principle of the rule of law, is a big problem."<br> <br>Source: Modern Express<br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
WIN3x38kV2
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.