<br>Newspaper reporter & nbsp; Fang & nbsp; newspaper correspondent & nbsp; clock method<br> <br>Didi little, wonderful trip. This used to be a taxi drops slogan, but recently "Didi taxi" days very beautiful, because formerly known as "Didi taxi" got involved in a trademark infringement dispute astronomical, the other claims 80.2 million!<br> <br>Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court yesterday opened a whole day's court, which is by far the highest court has accepted the target amount of trademark infringement.<br> <br>Movies plaintiff Hangzhou Miao says, "Didi" We have already successfully registered the trademark,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001079372.html, the company asked the defendant to stop infringement Beijing small orange, published a statement on the China Intellectual Property News,karen millen outlet, Evening News, CCTV Economic Channel and other national mainstream media to eliminate the influence and compensation for loss of 80 million, 200,http://antisociality2.rssing.com/chan-1970278/all_p5.html,000 legal fees.<br> <br>Why is 80 million?<br> <br>Wonderful shadow calculation, from September 2012 Didi hit the cart software line to the May 2014 lawsuit,ralph lauren soldes, the 20-month period, small orange in the capital market gained more than 20 billion of financing, which are infringing profit 80 million but then the drizzle.<br> <br>"We can say there is no financing, taxi drops dead tomorrow, and we still have not profit or a loss." Beijing small orange that this is a malicious litigation. "Before sue us, wonderful film company has repeatedly contact us and seeks 'Didi' trademark to pay high prices, it was our refusal."<br> <br>In the end who confuse the manufacturing<br> <br>"One time there were so many taxi software, there is no 'Didi' the prominent mark, who can identify you? Even if the final renamed" bit ", it is still not relax the onomatopoeia. Suffice it to say, this Didi large energy of the word mark. "Hangzhou wonderful Movies believe they are the trademark of" Didi "master, and Beijing is a small orange unauthorized, illegal use. "As early as May 21, 2012,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001086559.html, the State Administration for Industry and Trademark Office approved the issuance of the trademark by our application 'Didi', Approved categories include computer programs (downloadable software). And six months later, Didi taxi began to apply graphics, text composition 'Didi taxi' trademark. January 13, 2014 was rejected on the State administration for Industry and trademark Office. "<br> <br>Hangzhou wonderful film that began in August 2011, they launched the "Didi travel" to download the software, then there are "Didi navigation", "Didi map", "Didi taxi", mainly to promote in Hangzhou , until now continues to use.<br> <br>Beijing small orange retorted, Hangzhou Movies wonderful product "Didi taxi" little visibility, consumers do not mistake, but later imitate small orange graphic design companies, as well as advertising language "Didi little, wonderful trip" - but these are they intended to create a company with a small orange confuse.<br> <br>What is the basis for the claims 80 million<br> <br>In fact, this case is the most eye-catching, that is 80 million yuan of price claims.<br> <br>Hangzhou wonderful film on the grounds that, Didi Beijing taxi is only a small orange product, all the company's profits depend on it. 80 million is calculated from the profit out of the infringement. They believe that this staggering number, "is not too much, or even underestimated."<br> <br>They also listed three kinds of calculation methods:<br> <br>The first is the capital market profits.<br> <br>Small orange 2014 the company received a $ 180 million financing from Tencent and where to get more than 14 million taxi subsidies, in addition to cooperation advertiser subsidies. Such a calculation small orange total of 20 million profit, five percent is a million, but it claims 80 million points.<br> <br>The second is software downloads.<br> <br>As of March 2014, the company Didi small orange users reached 100 million, that is to say infringing goods reached 100 million per infringing goods pay a dollar count, far more than 80 million.<br> <br>The third is the actual loss suffered.<br> <br>Small orange taxi's beeping has covered 178 cities, has led to wonderful film itself marks and severe fragmentation,karen millen outlet, this is because Didi taxi marketing costs put a price realization, wonderful film to open product awareness, it is necessary considerable increase in advertising investment from Tencent small orange injection of 1.4 billion, the 80 million is a small part.<br> <br>Also according to Didi taxi average turnover of 1.5 million to 2,000,karen millen outlet,000 single-day trading volume in 20 months time small orange infringing company, the data is more than 1 million.<br> <br>"It's all subjective plaintiff must have imagined!"<br> <br>Beijing small orange agent, the mobile Internet company to survive must be financing. It can be said, without foreign capital taxi drops dead tomorrow. However, access to investment,babyliss pro perfect curl, not simply because a trademark can be accomplished, and the company has no profit or loss.<br> <br>The judge concluded that, considering how the contribution of the trademark in the benefit, is a focus of controversy.<br> <br>Yesterday, the court did not in court for sentencing.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
h87H5Q5v5w
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.