Dialogue Fang Hongjin « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

Dialogue Fang Hongjin

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by ujdrm98953uj

Tags:

ujdrm98953uj
Member

Fang Hongjin Data Figure,http://insyoku.livedoor.biz/archives/26006386.html CCTV Oprah ago after a divorce dispute both parties appeal the first instance the latest developments in a court filing formal appeal to his daughter Fang Hongjin to witness innocent CCTV Oprah before Fang Hongjin couple divorces with the latest developments. Reporter was informed that morning, a Court of Appeal has accepted to start the second instance. The end of 2010, Fang Hongjin Hongwei wife in divorce proceedings to the court and requested the partition of jointly owned property. In late December 2011, the revival of the court of first instance verdict Haidian divorce. According to the Court 'nurturing small three "of the evidence submitted in Hongwei, Fang Hongjin found at fault behavior in the marriage. They marital property during the duration of temporarily split. By the mother raising her daughter, Fang Hongjin 1800 yuan per month to pay alimony to his 18 years of age. The two sides were satisfied with appeal. Fang Hongjin morning told reporters, in order to appeal to her to prove "his father is innocent." Hongwei lawyer in the morning, told reporters in Hongwei appeal for property division, alimony and demands for higher standards daughter. Dialogue Fang Hongjin Appeal for her daughter did not prove innocence from the "mini three children." FW: What is the specific demands of your appeal? Fang Hongjin: appeal primarily to make it clear two things,nike tn pas cher, one thing about the "guarantee", the second is about to Hongwei said I have a 5-year-old illegitimate son thing. FW: Can talk about the "guarantee" of the problem? Fang Hongjin: Court of First Instance finds me at fault,http://jelado.ocnk.net, the main basis is provided in Hongwei I wrote a paper "guarantee." Hongwei said I was to have an illicit relationship with another woman, and I tangled,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/cio/n0100101609.html, I simply can not work. To appease her, I wrote what she meant by the "guarantee." I did not think there would be evidence to prove an affair. FW: Since it is not the thing, you can not prove it? Fang Hongjin: because before the trial in Hongwei lawyers had negotiated settlement and I talked, I did not prepare too much evidence. In Hongwei suddenly come up in court this "guarantee",http://www.hftreview.com/pg/blog/trishagee/read/110828/cant-take-much-more, the moment I get no rebuttal evidence. FW: Appeal new evidence submitted to it? Fang Hongjin: second instance I will certainly submit new evidence. Hongwei said to me and other women in Jiudiankaifang time, I just do the Three Gorges live broadcasts on television time. I will find television personnel to testify. FW: how about the bastard is going on,doudoune moncler femme? Fang Hongjin: Weihong is to say that I have a bastard, I hope she can quickly find this child, I would like to see him in the end look like! FW: What is the purpose of the appeal is the largest? Fang Hongjin: I appeal mainly to the daughter of Fang Zhen. Fang Zhen hated two things because I feel that I abandoned her. After the divorce court, I never saw her, and she did not know how to explain. I want to make her believe that the second trial,http://pet.kikakushin.com/genre507572/ud-page1.html, the father is innocent. Text / reporter Wang Hung Wang Wei Lawyers say Hongwei lawyers in Beijing in the run law firm Wang Jie told reporters, in Hongwei's appeal is mainly v. Indisputable dividing property and daughter alimony problem of excessively low. Requirements Split v contention Property Haidian District, Beijing is the only residence on a property Hongwei, and although the house was closed, but the seizure because Fang Hongjin personal debt is not executed. The Fang Hongjin debt owed verdict has been identified as their personal debt, by Fang Hongjin own personal reimbursement. We shall unseal the court house. Court house in the seizure of state, should not be a reason for the Court not to appeal the property dispute process. According to the provisions of tenure, "Supreme People's Court on the application of & lt;; People's Republic of China Marriage Law & gt (ii) to explain a number of issues,scarpe hogan online," the court ruling should not only include home ownership: the two sides have not yet obtained ownership or have not yet obtained full ownership of the disputed houses and the negotiation fails both cases. The house does not belong to the case v. Contention both cases, the houses were closed down simply because Fang Hongjin personal debt outstanding, the debt problem does not affect the ownership of the problem of housing. Therefore,http://jibun.atmarkit.co.jp/ljibun01/rensai/genesis/046/01.html, the court should not be closed down on the grounds to house grounds. Court of First Instance has identified Fang Hongjin wrongdoing in marriage,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=60&page=2, according to relevant regulations, the innocent party is entitled to claim damages. Thus, the distribution of property in divorce cases during the court may give the party,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/uchiyama-sports/nor-nm81304-a.html,air max 90 pas cher, regardless of fault or a smaller share of property. The present case, the Court can deal with complaints if the property dispute, and the houses of all individual award in Hongwei, you can be seized to solve the housing problem. Requirements increase alimony Fang Zhen enrolled in private schools, the cost of living is much higher than ordinary high school learning. Fang Zhen year tuition plus living expenses to be about 18 million. Fang Zhen attend private schools teaching in English Department, and belong to two national high school education system, will go to high school Fang Zhen reading unrealistic. Fang Hongjin Readme January 6000 its revenue was unilateral statement, he did not submit any proof of tax payment and other evidence. According to relevant regulations, the amount of tending children, should be based on the actual needs of their children, both parents affordability, local real living standards, and in favor of children from physical and mental health,piumini moncler, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the children determined angle. Therefore, the Court of First Instance ordered 1800 yuan alimony amount significantly too low. Share: welcome to comment I want to comment Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.