DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

BIHlXXg9Dg

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by e1jjkiewbc

  1. <br>Newspaper July 20 (Reporter correspondent Zheng Cao Hongyuan shoots) & nbsp; both mother and child at home using normal electric kettle to boil water, accidental electrocution mother,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001107718.html, daughter to mother pulled shock, her daughter died on the spot. Recently, the case Leling City People's Court after the trial, kangaroo line factories compensation to the family of the deceased Wang Ming (pseudonym) 120,000.<br> <br>& Nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; 2010 Nian. 7 29 morning, Wang's wife at home, normal accidental electrocution when electric kettle to boil water, the daughter hurried to pull his mother,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/gion/sl-a251-b.html, and finally, they are due to electrocution. The investigation,roshe run pas cher, Wang Ming at home by wire from a nearby chemical plant area connection, belonging kangaroo line. Wang ordered the prosecution to the chemical plant Leling City People's Court. Wang said he has used a decade ago, the private access line and pay for electricity. Cause of the accident was entirely due to the defendant produced for transformers and transmission lines caused by poor management.<br> <br>Chemical countered that while Ming is connected from the factory line,louboutin femme, but the factory yard is already installed leakage protection. When Wang a use of the facility itself is not installed, it should be the responsibility themselves. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Court held that,http://manfla.liblo.jp/archives/26249568.html, in accordance with Article 51,woolrich sito ufficiale, "Power Supply Business Rules" states: "occurs on the power supply facilities liability caused by the accident, according to the power supply facilities to determine property ownership of property belongs to whom, who assume that occur on its own power supply facilities accident. liability arising. "arising from the use of local electricity sector is not an accident lines, maintenance, managers,http://www.lager.co.jp/blog/sb.cgi,moncler femme,http://wjproducts.seesaa.net, nor those responsible for the incident. But chemical kangaroo line electrically connected to Wang's home,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/saifu-bagya/saifu-momo1029bk.html, they have to maintain, manage the responsibility. The plaintiff home without leakage protection, the chemical should be noted that the risk and take measures to avoid,http://www.replication.jp, so the plants have been lax management of the accident. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Finally,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/gion/gdr144v-lin.html,air max 90, the court made the decision according to the law, the plaintiff Wang bear responsibility for 60% of accidents, chemical defendant to bear 40% of the responsibility, chemical plants should compensate relatives of the deceased 120,000.<br> <br>Welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today (edit: SN026)<br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.