A lawsuit filed consumers, Coca-Cola allows for packaging it? Profile picture<br>Nanfang Daily (Reporter / Maxi Sheng intern / Zhou Haibo correspondent / Huang Caihua) 4 years, Dongguan Lee maintained the habit of drinking Coca-Cola, and drink at least two cans a day. Earlier this year, he was diagnosed with eight cavities. After checking the relevant information, Lee finds dental caries and drink Coca-Cola has a direct relationship. Yesterday, he Zhuangzhi a piece of paper, the Guangdong Swire Coca-Cola Company (hereinafter referred to as "Coca-Cola") and a supermarket selling Coke to his court.<br> <br>"Corrosion is the main cause of tooth containing carbonic acid"<br> <br>Yesterday, Lee wearing sunglasses, stern sitting plaintiff gallery. A defendant accused Coca-Cola Company and two supermarkets were sent lawyers to attend the trial.<br> <br>Lee said in court, his childhood teeth in good condition. Four years ago, he liked to drink Coca-Cola a day, drink 2 cans not enjoyable. Recently, he suddenly found teeth gradually loosened, and the emergence of a breaking off on the case, the doctor advised him to re-implant, implant price of each tablet up to 10,000 yuan.<br> <br>By chance, I heard Lee Coke will corrode the teeth. He queries the Internet to collect a lot of this information, many of them well-known experts and institutions are negative comments, and even abroad have sued Coca-Cola case. Lee believes that this information shows that the main reason is the corrosion of the teeth of Coca-Cola contains carbonic acid.<br> <br>Lee found that this was not a word of warning on the packaging of Coca-Cola, for which he will be the Coca-Cola company to court to require the defendant to compensate 300 yuan medical expenses, and promised to indicate warning labels on their product packaging.<br> <br>A court Focus: Coke whether tooth loss?<br> <br>Yesterday's court session,http://narcissu.doorblog.jp/archives/20584954.html, both the original defendant for Coke launched a heated debate whether the corrosion of the teeth.<br> <br>Coca-Cola attorney during cross-examination that the People's Health Publishing House "Oral Science," a book,woolrich outlet italia, for the cause of dental caries is expressed as: a multifactorial disease, four factors together to form dental caries, namely bacteria, carbohydrates, dental health itself time and bacteria on the teeth.<br> <br>The lawyer stressed that the generation of dental caries, is a sufficiently long period of time the sugar is attached to the teeth, the bacteria can be etched,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/frogberry/rfa177.html, so that poor oral hygiene is the main cause of dental caries. The four factors of dental caries form carbohydrates, sugar is converted from, and not directly related to carbon dioxide added to the Coca-Cola. Although Lee first listed carbonate human damage theory,louboutin femme, but failed to provide evidence of damage to human carbonic acid,nike air max 90, hope the court dismissed all the plaintiff's claim.<br> <br>After hearing the remark, Mr. Li emotional, said he was willing to pull out teeth donated to the national professional organization to do the experiment.<br> <br>For the first six Coca-Cola submitted evidence that the product through the Guangdong Product Quality Supervision and Inspection and Inspection Institute, questioned the plaintiffs' lawyers, said Coca-Cola in the examination submitted only five samples do not meet national standards submitted 12 test samples regulations, so that shortage test basis, the results can not be established.<br> <br>In response, Coca-Cola attorney reply, will communicate with the company's technical staff, and the results are turned over to the court in writing.<br> <br>Court Focus II: Coke to indicate the warning?<br> <br>Lee presented himself to the court in the supermarket to buy Coke invoices, as well as the hospital diagnosed cases, and submitted their online Now the judge Coke leads to tooth decay data. In his view, the defendant as a carbonated beverage enterprises, but did not indicate the information on the product,http://vegalta7.s156.xrea.com/aska/aska.cgi/page/aska.cgi, to remind consumers to drink Coke can cause tooth decay, to mislead consumers, violation of the consumer's right to know.<br> <br>Lee's attorney said, according to "Product Quality Law" Article 27 stipulates: product or logo on the packaging it must be true, and meet the following requirements: ...... inappropriate (V) used, may cause damage to the product itself or may jeopardize the personal and property safety, there should be warning signs or warning instructions in Chinese. "Consumer Protection Law" Article VIII: product packaging or logo on it must be true, you need to know in advance so that consumers should be indicated on the packaging,http://cutyayu.sakura.ne.jp/cabbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=111&page=1payon, or provide information to consumers in advance; improper use of products likely to cause corrosion itself or may endanger the personal and property safety, there should be warning signs or warning instructions in Chinese; consumers know their purchase, use of goods or the rights of the real situation of the services they receive.<br> <br>For Lee's complaint,http://cutyayu.sakura.ne.jp/cabbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=100&page=1Noelle", Coca-Cola has done well prepared,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/menscasual/s-tops-12-menscasual.html, to the Full Court issued a production license,scarpe hogan, the State Quality Supervision, Inspection and proof, carbonated soda beverage standards,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/f-box/rothco-9867-9767.html, the Ministry of Health food standards for food additives, food labeling AQSIQ management laws and regulations, Guangdong product supervision, inspection of product inspection and certification of six parts of the evidence,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/menscasual/s-pants-11-menscasual.html, both want to prove that the products meet national standards of production, packaging and labeling are also in line with relevant laws and regulations.<br> <br>The plaintiff said the lawsuit for the public benefit<br> <br>Yesterday the trial,moncler pas cher, Lee told reporters, he sued Coca-Cola is not to obtain compensation, but to Coca-Cola on the packaging for possible damage teeth as warning signs.<br> <br>Presiding Judge prompted whether both the original defendant reconciliation due to Coca-Cola can not make concessions on the terms on product packaging marked alerts Lee proposed the two sides did not reach agreement on a settlement, the case will choose a sentencing date.<br> <br>Welcome to comment I want to comment<br> Microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today (edit: SN026)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
By chance
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.